RAD-Seq analysis of wild Japanese garlic (Allium macrostemon Bunge) growing in Japan revealed that this neglected crop was previously actively utilized.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 09 2023
29 09 2023
Historique:
received:
28
07
2023
accepted:
25
09
2023
medline:
5
10
2023
pubmed:
29
9
2023
entrez:
29
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Allium macrostemon Bunge, commonly referred to as "no-biru" in Japan, is a widespread wild onion species found across the country. Despite being deeply entwined in ancient Japanese culture, it remains an underutilized crop in Japan. Determining the origins of its domestic populations and understanding their genetic composition is crucial to highlighting the plant's historical significance in Japan. This study aims to bridge this knowledge gap by examining the genetic diversity of 47 A. macrostemon samples from various regions in Japan using RAD-Seq. Our analyses distinguished unique population structures, dividing the samples into three distinct groups: A, B, and C. Notably, groups A and B showed clear evidence of bulb propagation, while group C did not. Group C formed four subgroups: C1, C2, C3, and C4. Hybridization between subgroup C1 and either group A, B, or both, resulted in the emergence of subgroups C2, C3, and C4. Thus, groups A, B, and C1 are posited as the ancestral populations. Additionally, our morphological observations indicated distinct differences among these three groups. Our findings also suggest that human migration may have influenced the plant's distribution, hinting at active usage in the past that later waned, causing its current underutilized status.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37773322
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43537-5
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-43537-5
pmc: PMC10541398
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
16354Informations de copyright
© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Genet Res Int. 2015;2015:431487
pubmed: 25874132
Mol Ecol. 2019 Nov;28(21):4737-4754
pubmed: 31550391
BMC Plant Biol. 2022 May 5;22(1):231
pubmed: 35513782
Nat Prod Commun. 2015 Aug;10(8):1381-2
pubmed: 26434122
Nat Rev Genet. 2016 Feb;17(2):81-92
pubmed: 26729255
Front Nutr. 2023 Feb 01;10:996675
pubmed: 36819690
Bioinformatics. 2011 Aug 1;27(15):2156-8
pubmed: 21653522
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 30;10(1):1533
pubmed: 32001772
J Ethnopharmacol. 2010 Sep 15;131(2):386-95
pubmed: 20637276
Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Sep;81(3):559-75
pubmed: 17701901
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2014 Jan;88:225-34
pubmed: 24080525
Bioinformatics. 2012 Dec 15;28(24):3326-8
pubmed: 23060615
Plant Methods. 2016 Aug 04;12:39
pubmed: 27493679
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 19;11(1):6464
pubmed: 33742052
Eur J Pharmacol. 2008 Dec 3;599(1-3):159-65
pubmed: 18930725
Nat Prod Commun. 2017 Jan;12(1):89-91
pubmed: 30549834
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37135
pubmed: 22675423
Carbohydr Polym. 2015 Mar 6;117:980-987
pubmed: 25498725
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 23;12(1):10200
pubmed: 35739209
J Ethnopharmacol. 2021 Dec 5;281:114495
pubmed: 34364968
Front Microbiol. 2021 Dec 08;12:789596
pubmed: 34956155
Sci Rep. 2014 Apr 30;4:4853
pubmed: 24781859
Breed Sci. 2016 Dec;66(5):797-807
pubmed: 28163596
Molecules. 2009 Jun 19;14(6):2246-53
pubmed: 19553896
Genome Res. 2009 Sep;19(9):1655-64
pubmed: 19648217