Environmental surveillance for Salmonella Typhi and its association with typhoid fever incidence in India and Malawi.

India Malawi Salmonella Typhi typhoid fever typhoid-paratyphoid vaccines wastewater surveillance

Journal

The Journal of infectious diseases
ISSN: 1537-6613
Titre abrégé: J Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0413675

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 Sep 2023
Historique:
received: 07 07 2023
revised: 15 09 2023
accepted: 26 09 2023
medline: 30 9 2023
pubmed: 30 9 2023
entrez: 29 9 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Environmental surveillance (ES) for Salmonella Typhi potentially offers a low-cost tool to identify communities with a high burden of typhoid fever. We developed standardised protocols for typhoid ES, including sampling site selection, validation, characterisation; grab or trap sample collection, concentration; and quantitative PCR targeting Salmonella genes (ttr, staG and tviB) and a marker of human faecal contamination (HF183). ES was implemented over 12-months in a historically high typhoid fever incidence setting (Vellore, India) and a lower incidence setting (Blantyre, Malawi) during 2021-2022. S. Typhi prevalence in ES samples was higher in Vellore compared with Blantyre; 39/520 (7.5%, 95% Confidence Interval 4.4-12.4%) vs. 11/533 (2.1%, 1.1-4.0%) in grab and 79/517 (15.3%, 9.8-23.0%) vs. 23/594 (3.9%, 1.9-7.9%) in trap samples. Detection was clustered by ES site and correlated with site catchment population in Vellore but not Blantyre. Incidence of culture-confirmed typhoid in local hospitals was low during the study and zero some months in Vellore despite S. Typhi detection in ES. ES describes the prevalence and distribution of S. Typhi even in the absence of typhoid cases and could inform vaccine introduction. Expanded implementation and comparison with clinical and serological surveillance will further establish its public health utility.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Environmental surveillance (ES) for Salmonella Typhi potentially offers a low-cost tool to identify communities with a high burden of typhoid fever.
METHODS METHODS
We developed standardised protocols for typhoid ES, including sampling site selection, validation, characterisation; grab or trap sample collection, concentration; and quantitative PCR targeting Salmonella genes (ttr, staG and tviB) and a marker of human faecal contamination (HF183). ES was implemented over 12-months in a historically high typhoid fever incidence setting (Vellore, India) and a lower incidence setting (Blantyre, Malawi) during 2021-2022.
RESULTS RESULTS
S. Typhi prevalence in ES samples was higher in Vellore compared with Blantyre; 39/520 (7.5%, 95% Confidence Interval 4.4-12.4%) vs. 11/533 (2.1%, 1.1-4.0%) in grab and 79/517 (15.3%, 9.8-23.0%) vs. 23/594 (3.9%, 1.9-7.9%) in trap samples. Detection was clustered by ES site and correlated with site catchment population in Vellore but not Blantyre. Incidence of culture-confirmed typhoid in local hospitals was low during the study and zero some months in Vellore despite S. Typhi detection in ES.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
ES describes the prevalence and distribution of S. Typhi even in the absence of typhoid cases and could inform vaccine introduction. Expanded implementation and comparison with clinical and serological surveillance will further establish its public health utility.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37775091
pii: 7286615
doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiad427
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Auteurs

Christopher B Uzzell (CB)

Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Dilip Abraham (D)

Division of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.

Jonathan Rigby (J)

Malawi-Liverpool Wellcome Programme, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.

Catherine M Troman (CM)

Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Satheesh Nair (S)

Gastrointestinal Bacteria Reference Unit, UK Health Security Agency, Colindale, London, UK.

Nicola Elviss (N)

Science Group, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK.

Lalithambigai Kathiresan (L)

Department of Community Health, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.

Rajan Srinivasan (R)

Department of Community Health, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.

Veeraraghavan Balaji (V)

Division of Antimicrobial Resistance and Surveillance, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.

Nicolette A Zhou (NA)

Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

John Scott Meschke (JS)

Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

Jacob John (J)

Department of Community Health, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.

Gagandeep Kang (G)

Division of Gastrointestinal Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.

Nicholas Feasey (N)

Malawi-Liverpool Wellcome Programme, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.

Venkata Raghava Mohan (VR)

Department of Community Health, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.

Nicholas C Grassly (NC)

Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Classifications MeSH