Oversizing of the Woven EndoBridge for Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms Improves Angiographic Results (WEBINAR).

Endovascular Flow-disruption Intracranial aneurysm Intrasaccular

Journal

World neurosurgery
ISSN: 1878-8769
Titre abrégé: World Neurosurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101528275

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Sep 2023
Historique:
received: 11 08 2023
revised: 20 09 2023
accepted: 21 09 2023
pubmed: 1 10 2023
medline: 1 10 2023
entrez: 30 9 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Several studies have demonstrated a high safety and efficacy profile of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) for endovascular aneurysm treatment. However, contemporary large-scale studies of the WEB are rare. This multicenter study attempts to set a benchmark for state-of-the-art WEB treatment with consistent application of the WEB oversizing technique. This is a retrospective, multicenter study of aneurysms (dome width 2-10 mm) treated with the WEB between 2015 and 2023. Patient and aneurysm characteristics, complications, and clinical and angiographic outcomes were analyzed. The study consisted of 247 patients treated for 251 aneurysms (25.5% ruptured, 5.6% recurrent). WEB implantation was feasible in 98.8%, achieving a mean WEB/dome ratio of 1.2 ± 0.1. The thromboembolic complication rate was 7.2%, which was higher in ruptured versus unruptured aneurysms (hazard ratio: 2.8, 95%CI: 1.0-7.6, P = 0.04), but lower in cases where WEB 17 was used (hazard ratio: 4.0, 95%CI: 1.4-11.2, P = 0.01). Neurological complications occurred in 8 procedures (3.2%), including 3 (1.2%) major, and 5 (2.0%) minor events. Procedural morbidity and mortality were 0.8% and 0%, respectively. Mid-term complete and adequate occlusion rates were 66.3% and 88.4%, respectively. The retreatment rate was 5.2%. Feasibility, complication, and occlusion rates were comparable between typical and atypical aneurysm locations. Oversizing the WEB and using currently available WEB types in this series resulted in slightly better treatment outcomes compared to early WEB studies, confirming the high safety, feasibility, and efficacy of this technique.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37777172
pii: S1878-8750(23)01358-X
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.09.090
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Lukas Goertz (L)

Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. Electronic address: lukas.goertz@uk-koeln.de.

Thomas Liebig (T)

Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany.

Eberhard Siebert (E)

Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Berlin (Charité), Berlin, Germany.

David Zopfs (D)

Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Lenhard Pennig (L)

Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Marc Schlamann (M)

Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Franziska Dorn (F)

Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Christoph Kabbasch (C)

Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Classifications MeSH