Emergency and sequalae management of traumatic dental injuries: a systematic survey of clinical practice guidelines.
AGREE II
Clinical practice guidelines
Systematic review
Traumatic dental injuries
Journal
BMC oral health
ISSN: 1472-6831
Titre abrégé: BMC Oral Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088684
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 09 2023
30 09 2023
Historique:
received:
22
04
2023
accepted:
12
09
2023
medline:
2
10
2023
pubmed:
1
10
2023
entrez:
30
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The prevalence and consequences of traumatic dental injuries (TDI) make them a public health problem. Trustworthy TDI clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) assist clinicians in determining a diagnosis and guide them to the most appropriate therapy. The aim of this systematic survey was to identify and evaluate the quality of CPGs for the diagnosis, emergency management, and follow-up of TDIs. A systematic search was carried out in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Epistemonikos, Trip database, CPG websites, and dental societies to identify documents providing recommendations for the emergency and sequelae management of TDIs. Reviewers assessed the included guidelines independently and in duplicate, using the AGREE II instrument. ANOVA or Student's t-tests were used to determine the attributes of CPGs associated with the total score in AGREE II. Ten CPGs published between 2010 and 2020 were included, mostly from Europe (n = 6). The overall agreement between reviewers was very good (0.94; 95%CI 0.91-0.97). The mean scores (the higher the score, the better the domain assessment) per domain were as follows: Scope and purpose 78.0 ± 18.9%; stakeholder involvement 46.9 ± 29.6%; rigour of development 41.8 ± 26.7%; clarity of presentation 75.8 ± 17.6%; applicability 15.3 ± 18.8%; and editorial independence 41.7 ± 41.7%. The overall mean rate was 4 ± 1.3 out of a maximum score of 7. Two guidelines were recommended by the reviewers for use in practice and rated as high quality. CPGs developed by government organizations showed a significantly higher overall score. The overall quality of CPGs on TDI was suboptimal. CPG developers should synthesize the evidence and formulate recommendations using high-quality methodologies and standards in a structured, transparent, and explicit way.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The prevalence and consequences of traumatic dental injuries (TDI) make them a public health problem. Trustworthy TDI clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) assist clinicians in determining a diagnosis and guide them to the most appropriate therapy. The aim of this systematic survey was to identify and evaluate the quality of CPGs for the diagnosis, emergency management, and follow-up of TDIs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic search was carried out in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Epistemonikos, Trip database, CPG websites, and dental societies to identify documents providing recommendations for the emergency and sequelae management of TDIs. Reviewers assessed the included guidelines independently and in duplicate, using the AGREE II instrument. ANOVA or Student's t-tests were used to determine the attributes of CPGs associated with the total score in AGREE II.
RESULTS
Ten CPGs published between 2010 and 2020 were included, mostly from Europe (n = 6). The overall agreement between reviewers was very good (0.94; 95%CI 0.91-0.97). The mean scores (the higher the score, the better the domain assessment) per domain were as follows: Scope and purpose 78.0 ± 18.9%; stakeholder involvement 46.9 ± 29.6%; rigour of development 41.8 ± 26.7%; clarity of presentation 75.8 ± 17.6%; applicability 15.3 ± 18.8%; and editorial independence 41.7 ± 41.7%. The overall mean rate was 4 ± 1.3 out of a maximum score of 7. Two guidelines were recommended by the reviewers for use in practice and rated as high quality. CPGs developed by government organizations showed a significantly higher overall score.
CONCLUSIONS
The overall quality of CPGs on TDI was suboptimal. CPG developers should synthesize the evidence and formulate recommendations using high-quality methodologies and standards in a structured, transparent, and explicit way.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37777731
doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03409-w
pii: 10.1186/s12903-023-03409-w
pmc: PMC10543333
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
704Informations de copyright
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Lam R. Epidemiology and outcomes of traumatic dental injuries: a review of the literature. Australian Dent J. 2016;61:4–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12395 .
doi: 10.1111/adj.12395
Zaror C, Martínez-Zapata MJ, Abarca J, Diaz J, Pardo Y, Pont A, et al. Impact of traumatic dental injuries on quality of life in preschoolers and schoolchildren: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2018;46(1):88–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12333 .
doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12333
pubmed: 28940434
Petti S, Glendor U, Andersson L. World traumatic dental injury prevalence and incidence, a meta-analysis—one billion living people have had traumatic dental injuries. Dent Traumatol. 2018;34(2):71–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12389 .
doi: 10.1111/edt.12389
pubmed: 29455471
Levin L, Day PF, Hicks L, O’Connell A, Fouad AF, Bourguignon C, et al. International Association of Dental Traumatology guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries: General introduction. Dent Traumatol. 2020;36(4):309–13.
doi: 10.1111/edt.12574
pubmed: 32472740
Tewari N, Sultan F, Mathur VP, Rahul M, Goel S, Bansal K, et al. Global status of dental professionals’ knowledge for the prevention and emergency management of traumatic dental injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent Traumatol. 2021;37(2):161–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12621 .
doi: 10.1111/edt.12621
pubmed: 33180997
Milani AJ, Castilho T, Assaf AV, Antunes LS, Antunes LAA. Impact of traumatic dental injury treatment on the oral health-related quality of life of children, adolescents, and their family: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Dent Traumatol. 2021;37(6):735–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12697 .
doi: 10.1111/edt.12697
pubmed: 34156753
Bani-Hani TG, Olegário IC, O’Connell AC. The cost of dental trauma management: a one‐year prospective study in children. Dent Traumatol. 2020;36(5):526–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12561 .
doi: 10.1111/edt.12561
pubmed: 32330346
Borum MK, Andreasen JO. Therapeutic and economic implications of traumatic dental injuries in Denmark: an estimate based on 7549 patients treated at a major trauma centre. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2001;11(4):249–58. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-263x.2001.00277.x .
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-263x.2001.00277.x
pubmed: 11570440
Field MJ, Lohr KN. Clinical practice guidelines. Directions for a new program. 1990:1990.
Deana N, Zaror C, Seiffert A, Aravena-Rivas Y, Muñoz-Milán P, Espinoza-Espinoza G, et al. Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on dental services provision during the first months ot the Covid-19 pandemic. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2021;21(4):101633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2021.101633 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2021.101633
pubmed: 34922731
pmcid: 8402995
Madera M, Franco J, Solà I, Bonfill X, Alonso-Coello P. Screening and diagnosis of oral cancer: a critical quality appraisal of clinical guidelines. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(5):2215–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2668-7 .
doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2668-7
pubmed: 30284100
Anaya MVM, Franco JV, Merchán-Galvis ÁM, Gallardo CR, Cosp XB. Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines on treatments for oral cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2018;65:47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.03.001 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.03.001
Seiffert A, Zaror C, Atala-Acevedo C, Ormeno A, Martinez-Zapata MJ, Alonso-Coello P. Dental caries prevention in children and adolescents: a systematic quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(9):3129–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2405-2 .
doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2405-2
pubmed: 29524023
Bateman G, Saha S. A brief guide to clinical guidelines. Br Dent J. 2007;203(10):581–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2007.1044 .
doi: 10.1038/bdj.2007.1044
pubmed: 18037844
Geleris P, Boudoulas H. Problems related to the application of guidelines in clinical practice: a critical analysis. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2011;52(2):97–102.
pubmed: 21478118
Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A, Beyond PICO. The SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(10):1435–43.
doi: 10.1177/1049732312452938
pubmed: 22829486
Zaror C, Seiffert A, Espinoza-Espinoza G, Deana N, Atala C, Díaz R et al. Emergency and sequalae management of traumatic dental injuries: a quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines (Protocol). 2022 [Available from: https://osf.io/y8mzt/ .
Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, Burgers JS, Cluzeau F, Feder G, et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ. 2010;182(18):E839–42. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.090449 .
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.090449
pubmed: 20603348
pmcid: 3001530
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977:159 – 74.
Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA. Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(5):1763–8. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864 .
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864
pubmed: 29481436
British Society of Paediatric Dentistry. UK National Clinical Guidelines in Paediatric Dentistry Treatment of avulsed permanent teeth in children. Dental Practice Board; 2012.
Gregg T, Boyd D. UK National Clinical Guidelines in Paediatric Dentistry. Int J Paediatr Dent. 1997;7(4):267–72.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-263X.1997.00053.x
Cagetti MG, Marcoli PA, Berengo M, Cascone P, Cordone L, Defabianis P, et al. Italian guidelines for the prevention and management of dental trauma in children. Int J Pediatr. 2019;45(1):1–14.
Bourguignon C, Cohenca N, Lauridsen E, Flores MT, O’Connell AC, Day PF, et al. International Association of Dental Traumatology guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries: 1. Fractures and luxations. Dent Traumatol. 2020;36(4):314–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12578 .
doi: 10.1111/edt.12578
pubmed: 32475015
Fouad AF, Abbott PV, Tsilingaridis G, Cohenca N, Lauridsen E, Bourguignon C, et al. International Association of Dental Traumatology guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries: 2. Avulsion of permanent teeth. Dent Traumatol. 2020;36(4):331–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12573 .
doi: 10.1111/edt.12573
pubmed: 32460393
Day PF, Flores MT, O’Connell AC, Abbott PV, Tsilingaridis G, Fouad AF, et al. International Association of Dental Traumatology guidelines for the management of traumatic dental injuries: 3. Injuries in the primary dentition. Dent Traumatol. 2020;36(4):343–59.
doi: 10.1111/edt.12576
pubmed: 32458553
Ministry of Health Malaysia. Management of Avulsed Permanent Anterior Teeth Malaysia: Oral Health Technology Section. Oral Health Programme. Ministry of Health Malaysia. ; 2019 [Available from: http://www.moh.gov.my .
Scottish Dental Clinical Effectiveness Programme (SDCEP). Management of Acute Dental Problems. Guidance for healthcare professionals. UK: SDCEP. ; 2013 [Available from: https://www.sdcep.org.uk/media/ixlpeakb/sdcep-madp-guidance-march-2013.pdf .
Albadri S, Zaitoun H, Kinirons M. UK National Clinical Guidelines in Paediatric Dentistry: treatment of traumatically intruded permanent incisor teeth in children 2010 [e10-e3].
Mubeen S, Patel K, Cunningham Z, O’Rourke N, Pandis N, Cobourne MT, et al. Assessing the quality of dental clinical practice guidelines. J Dent. 2017;67:102–6.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.10.003
pubmed: 29031996
Alonso-Coello P, Irfan A, Solà I, Gich I, Delgado-Noguera M, Rigau D, et al. The quality of clinical practice guidelines over the last two decades: a systematic review of guideline appraisal studies. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19(6):e58–e.
pubmed: 21127089
Zaror C, Deana NF, Espinoza-Espinoza G, Aravena‐Rivas Y, Muñoz‐Millán P, Pineda P, et al. Questions and health outcomes prioritization for the development of a COVID‐19 dental clinical practice guideline: a case study. J Eval Clin Pract. 2022;28(3):404–10.
doi: 10.1111/jep.13658
pubmed: 35080284
Madadian M, Benning A, Fan K, Pandis N, Seehra J. Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines used in oral and maxillofacial surgery. InT J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;49(3):403–10.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.08.003
pubmed: 31466829
Saikia A, Patil SS, Muthu M, Divyambika C, Sabarish R, Pandian S, et al. Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for traumatic Dental Injuries. Dent Traumatol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12838 .
doi: 10.1111/edt.12838
pubmed: 36920339
Zhang Y, Coello PA, Brożek J, Wiercioch W, Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I, Akl EA, et al. Using patient values and preferences to inform the importance of health outcomes in practice guideline development following the GRADE approach. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):1–10.
doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0621-0
pubmed: 28069015
pmcid: 5220611
Roman BR, Feingold J. Patient-centered guideline development: best practices can improve the quality and impact of guidelines. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;151(4):530–2.
doi: 10.1177/0194599814544878
pubmed: 25085323
Armstrong MJ, Mullins CD, Gronseth GS, Gagliardi AR. Recommendations for patient engagement in guideline development panels: a qualitative focus group study of guideline-naïve patients. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(3):e0174329.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174329
pubmed: 28319201
pmcid: 5358846
Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. John Wiley & Sons; 2019.
GRADE Working Group. GRADE [Available from: https://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/ .
Deana NF, Zaror C, Seiffert A, Aravena-Rivas Y, Muñoz-Millán P, Espinoza-Espinoza G, et al. Quality appraisal of clinical practice guidelines on dental services provision during the first months ot the Covid-19 pandemic. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2021;21(4):101633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2021.101633 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2021.101633
pubmed: 34922731
pmcid: 8402995
Norris SL, Holmer HK, Ogden LA, Burda BU. Conflict of interest in clinical practice guideline development: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(10):e25153. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025153 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025153
pubmed: 22039406
pmcid: 3198464
Sox HC. Conflict of interest in practice guidelines panels. JAMA. 2017;317(17):1739–40. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.2701 .
doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.2701
pubmed: 28464160
Burgers JS, Cluzeau FA, Hanna SE, Hunt C, Grol R. Characteristics of high-quality guidelines: evaluation of 86 clinical guidelines developed in ten european countries and Canada. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003;19(1):148–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/s026646230300014x .
doi: 10.1017/s026646230300014x
pubmed: 12701947
El-Harakeh A, Lotfi T, Ahmad A, Morsi RZ, Fadlallah R, Bou-Karroum L, et al. The implementation of prioritization exercises in the development and update of health practice guidelines: a scoping review. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(3):e0229249. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229249 .
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229249
pubmed: 32196520
pmcid: 7083273
Mustafa RA, Garcia CAC, Bhatt M, Riva JJ, Vesely S, Wiercioch W, et al. GRADE notes: how to use GRADE when there is no evidence? A case study of the expert evidence approach. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;137:231–5.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.026
pubmed: 33675954
Jordán Mariño F, Sossa Rojas H, Estrada Montoya JH. Protocolo de manejo de diente permanente avulsionado para el servicio de salud oral de la Fundación Hospital La Misericordia y la Facultad de Odontología de la Universidad Nacional de Colombia, sede Bogotá (2011). Univ Odontol. 2011:185–210.Universidad de Cauca. Guía de Manejo Trauma Dento Alveolar: Universidad de Cuaca; 2011a [Available from: http://www.odontologia.unal.edu.co/docs/habilitacion_homi/9.%20Guia%20de%20Manejo%20de%20Trauma%20Dentoalveolar.pdf .
Universidad de Cauca. Guía de Manejo Trauma Dento Alveolar: Universidad de Cuaca. ; 2011a [Available from: http://www.odontologia.unal.edu.co/docs/habilitacion_homi/9.%20Guia%20de%20Manejo%20de%20Trauma%20Dentoalveolar.pdf .
Universidad de Cuaca. Guía de manejo trauma dentoalveolar: Universidad de Cuaca. ; 2011b [Available from: https://unisalud.unicauca.edu.co/unisalud/sites/default/files/7_guia_mtda.pdf .
German Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (DGMKG), German Society for Dental OaMMD, S2k-Leitlinie. (Leitlinienreport) Therapie des dentalen Traumas bleibender Zähne Germany: AWMF. Das Portal der wissenschaftlichen Medizin; 2022 [Available from: https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/083-004m_S2k_Therapie-des-dentalen-Traumas-bleibender-Zaehne_2022-10.pdf .
German Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (DGMKG)., German Society for Dental OaMMD. S2k-Leitlinie (Langfassung). Therapie des dentalen Traumas bleibender Zähne Germany: AWMF. Das Portal der wissenschaftlichen Medizin; 2022 [updated 03/2022. Available from: https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/083-004l_S2k_Therapie-des-dentalen-Traumas-bleibender-Zaehne_2022-10.pdf .
Krastl G, Weiger R, Filippi A, Van Waes H, Ebeleseder K, Ree M, et al. European Society of Endodontology position statement: endodontic management of traumatized permanent teeth. Int Endod J. 2021;54(9):1473–81.
doi: 10.1111/iej.13543
pubmed: 33934366
American Association of Endodontics. The Recommended Guidelines of the American Association of Endodontists for the Treatment of Traumatic Dental Injuries USA: American Association of Endodontics,; 2014 [Available from: https://www.aae.org/specialty/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2019/02/19_TraumaGuidelines.pdf .