Experts' recommendations in laser use for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a comprehensive guide by the European Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) and Training Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.) group.


Journal

World journal of urology
ISSN: 1433-8726
Titre abrégé: World J Urol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8307716

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 07 07 2023
accepted: 14 09 2023
medline: 9 11 2023
pubmed: 1 10 2023
entrez: 1 10 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To highlight and compare experts' laser settings during endoscopic laser treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), to identify measures to reduce complications, and to propose guidance for endourologists. Following a focused literature search to identify relevant questions, a survey was sent to laser experts. We asked participants for typical settings during specific scenarios (ureteroscopy (URS), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), and percutaneous treatment). These settings were compared among the reported laser types to find common settings and limits. Additionally, we identified preventive measures commonly applied during surgery. Twenty experts completed the survey, needing a mean time of 12.7 min. Overall, most common laser type was Holmium-Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet (Ho:YAG) (70%, 14/20) followed by Thulium fiber laser (TFL) (45%, 9/20), pulsed Thulium-Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet (Tm:YAG) (3/20, 15%), and continuous wave (cw)Tm:YAG (1/20, 5%). Pulse energy for the treatment of distal ureteral tumors was significantly different with median settings of 0.9 J, 1 J and 0.45 J for Ho:YAG, TFL and pulsed Tm:YAG, respectively (p = 0.048). During URS and RIRS, pulse shapes were significantly different, with Ho:YAG being used in long pulse and TFL in short pulse mode (all p < 0.05). We did not find further disparities. Ho:YAG is used by most experts, while TFL is the most promising alternative. Laser settings largely do not vary significantly. However, further research with novel lasers is necessary to define the optimal approach. With the recent introduction of small caliber and more flexible scopes, minimal-invasive UTUC treatment is further undergoing an extension of applicability in appropriately selected patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37777981
doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04632-4
pii: 10.1007/s00345-023-04632-4
doi:

Substances chimiques

yttrium-aluminum-garnet 0
Thulium 8RKC5ATI4P
Holmium W1XX32SQN1

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3367-3376

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Références

Rouprêt M, Babjuk M, Burger M, Capoun O, Cohen D, Compérat EM et al (2021) European Association of Urology guidelines on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: 2020 update. Eur Urol 79(1):62–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.042
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.042 pubmed: 32593530
Baard J, Freund JE, de la Rosette JJ, Laguna MP (2017) New technologies for upper tract urothelial carcinoma management. Curr Opin Urol 27(2):170–175. https://doi.org/10.1097/mou.0000000000000373
doi: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000373 pubmed: 28085698
Jung H, Giusti G, Fajkovic H, Herrmann T, Jones R, Straub M et al (2019) Consultation on UTUC, Stockholm 2018: aspects of treatment. World J Urol 37(11):2279–2287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02811-w
doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02811-w pubmed: 31123852 pmcid: 6825640
Villa L, Haddad M, Capitanio U, Somani BK, Cloutier J, Doizi S et al (2018) Which patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma can be safely treated with flexible ureteroscopy with holmium: YAG laser photoablation? Long-term results from a high volume institution. J Urol 199(1):66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.07.088
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.07.088 pubmed: 28818526
Sanguedolce F, Fontana M, Turco M, Territo A, Lucena JB, Cortez JC et al (2021) Endoscopic management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: oncologic outcomes and prognostic factors in a contemporary cohort. J Endourol 35(11):1593–1600. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2021.0133
doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0133 pubmed: 33971725
Defidio L, Antonucci M, De Dominicis M, Fuchs G, Patel A (2019) Thulium-holmium: YAG duo laser in conservative upper tract urothelial cancer treatment: 13 years experience from a tertiary national referral center. J Endourol 33(11):902–908. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0308
doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0308 pubmed: 31422699
Breda A, Territo A, Sanguedolce F (2020) Combination of holmium and thulium laser ablation in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. World J Urol 38(10):2661–2662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03124-z
doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03124-z pubmed: 32065278
Musi G, Mistretta FA, Marenghi C, Russo A, Catellani M, Nazzani S et al (2018) Thulium laser treatment of upper urinary tract carcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis of surgical and oncological outcomes. J Endourol 32(3):257–263. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0915
doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0915 pubmed: 29357686
Wen J, Ji ZG, Li HZ (2018) Treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma with ureteroscopy and thulium laser: a retrospective single center study. BMC Cancer 18(1):196. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4118-y
doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4118-y pubmed: 29454319 pmcid: 5816553
Proietti S, Johnston T, Pupulin M, Di Pietro S, Spagna S, Rico L et al (2022) Effectiveness and safety of thulium fiber laser in the conservative management of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Eur Urol Open Sci 46:99–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2022.10.010
doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.10.010 pubmed: 36506254 pmcid: 9732449
Taratkin M, Singla N, Babaevskaya D, Androsov A, Shariat SF, Fajkovic H et al (2023) A review of how lasers are used in UTUC surgery: can the choice of laser affect outcomes? Cancers. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15061874
doi: 10.3390/cancers15061874 pubmed: 36980763 pmcid: 10047311
Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G (2008) Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J 22(2):338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
doi: 10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF pubmed: 17884971
Enikeev D, Taratkin M (2023) Thulium fiber laser: bringing lasers to a whole new level. Eur Urol Open Sci 48:31–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2022.07.007
doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.07.007 pubmed: 36588770
Taratkin M, Kovalenko A, Laukhtina E, Paramonova N, Spivak L, Wachtendorf LJ et al (2022) Ex vivo study of Ho: YAG and thulium fiber lasers for soft tissue surgery: which laser for which case? Lasers Med Sci 37(1):149–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-020-03189-7
doi: 10.1007/s10103-020-03189-7 pubmed: 33175250
Proietti S, Rodríguez-Socarrás ME, Eisner BH, Lucianò R, Basulto Martinez MJ, Yeow Y et al (2021) Thulium:YAG versus holmium: YAG laser effect on upper urinary tract soft tissue: evidence from an ex vivo experimental study. J Endourol 35(4):544–551. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0222
doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0222 pubmed: 32808543
Ortner G, Rice P, Nagele U, Herrmann TRW, Somani BK, Tokas T (2023) Tissue thermal effect during lithotripsy and tissue ablation in endourology: a systematic review of experimental studies comparing Holmium and Thulium lasers. World J Urol 41(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04242-6
doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04242-6 pubmed: 36515722
Huusmann S, Lafos M, Meyenburg I, Muschter R, Teichmann HO, Herrmann T (2021) Tissue effects of a newly developed diode pumped pulsed Thulium:YAG laser compared to continuous wave thulium: YAG and pulsed holmium: YAG laser. World J Urol 39(9):3503–3508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03634-4
doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03634-4 pubmed: 33728503 pmcid: 8510916
Becker B, Enikeev D, Glybochko P, Rapoport L, Taratkin M, Gross AJ et al (2020) Effect of optical fiber diameter and laser emission mode (cw vs pulse) on tissue damage profile using 1.94 µm Tm: fiber lasers in a porcine kidney model. World J Urol 38(6):1563–1568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02944-y
doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02944-y pubmed: 31515606
Rouprêt M, Hupertan V, Traxer O, Loison G, Chartier-Kastler E, Conort P et al (2006) Comparison of open nephroureterectomy and ureteroscopic and percutaneous management of upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma. Urology 67(6):1181–1187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2005.12.034
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.12.034 pubmed: 16765178
Rouprêt M, Traxer O, Tligui M, Conort P, Chartier-Kastler E, Richard F et al (2007) Upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma: recurrence rate after percutaneous endoscopic resection. Eur Urol 51(3):709–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.07.019 . (discussion 14)
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.07.019 pubmed: 16911852
Villa L, Cloutier J, Letendre J, Ploumidis A, Salonia A, Cornu JN et al (2016) Early repeated ureteroscopy within 6–8 weeks after a primary endoscopic treatment in patients with upper tract urothelial cell carcinoma: preliminary findings. World J Urol 34(9):1201–1206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1753-7
doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1753-7 pubmed: 26699629
Ortner G, Pang KH, Yuan Y, Herrmann TRW, Biyani CS, Tokas T (2023) Peri- and post-operative outcomes, complications, and functional results amongst different modifications of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP): a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04308-z
doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04308-z pubmed: 37777981
Gauhar V, Gilling P, Pirola GM, Chan VW, Lim EJ, Maggi M et al (2022) Does MOSES technology enhance the efficiency and outcomes of standard holmium laser enucleation of the prostate? Results of a Systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol Focus 8(5):1362–1369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2022.01.013
doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.01.013 pubmed: 35105516
Enikeev D, Taratkin M, Azilgareeva C, Glybochko P (2020) Knowing the inside of a laser. Arch Esp Urol 73(8):665–674
pubmed: 33025911
Mertens LS, Sharma V, Matin SF, Boorjian SA, Houston Thompson R, van Rhijn BWG et al (2023) Bladder recurrence following upper tract surgery for urothelial carcinoma: a contemporary review of risk factors and management strategies. Eur Urol Open Sci 49:60–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2023.01.004
doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.01.004 pubmed: 36793750 pmcid: 9922921
Yonese I, Ito M, Waseda Y, Kobayashi S, Toide M, Takazawa R et al (2023) Impact of diagnostic ureteral catheterization on intravesical tumour recurrence following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04446-4
doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04446-4 pubmed: 37270737
Douglawi A, Ghoreifi A, Lee R, Yip W, Seyedian SSL, Ahmadi H et al (2022) Bladder recurrence following diagnostic ureteroscopy in patients undergoing nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial cancer: is ureteral access sheath protective? Urology 160:142–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.11.026
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.11.026 pubmed: 34929237
Tokas T, Skolarikos A, Herrmann TRW, Nagele U (2019) Pressure matters 2: intrarenal pressure ranges during upper-tract endourological procedures. World J Urol 37(1):133–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2379-3
doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2379-3 pubmed: 29915944
Rice P, Somani BK, Nagele U, Herrmann TRW, Tokas T (2022) Generated temperatures and thermal laser damage during upper tract endourological procedures using the holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho: YAG) laser: a systematic review of experimental studies. World J Urol 40(8):1981–1992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-03992-7
doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-03992-7 pubmed: 35355103
Fero KE, Shan Y, Lec PM, Sharma V, Srinivasan A, Movva G et al (2021) Treatment patterns, outcomes, and costs associated with localized upper tract urothelial carcinoma. JNCI Cancer Spectr. https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkab085
doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkab085 pubmed: 34805743 pmcid: 8599752

Auteurs

Gernot Ortner (G)

Department of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall i.T, Milser Straße 10, 6060, Hall in Tirol, Austria. gerni_o@hotmail.com.
Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group, Hall in Tirol, Austria. gerni_o@hotmail.com.

Bhaskar Kumar Somani (BK)

Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, England.

Selcuk Güven (S)

Department of Urology, Meram School of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.

Gerhard Kitzbichler (G)

Department of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall i.T, Milser Straße 10, 6060, Hall in Tirol, Austria.

Olivier Traxer (O)

Sorbonne University, GRC n°20 Lithiase Renale, AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France.

Guido Giusti (G)

Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.

Silvia Proietti (S)

Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.

Evangelos Liatsikos (E)

Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.

Panagiotis Kallidonis (P)

Department of Urology, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.

Øyvind Ulvik (Ø)

Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

Ioannis Kartalas Goumas (IK)

Department of Urology, Istituto Clinico Beato Matteo, Vigevano, Italy.

Mordechai Duvdevani (M)

Department of Urology, Hadassah Ein-Kerem University Hospital, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.

Joyce Baard (J)

Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Guido M Kamphuis (GM)

Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Stefania Ferretti (S)

Department of Urology, Hospital and University of Modena, Modena, Italy.

Laurian Dragos (L)

Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.

Luca Villa (L)

Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.

Arkadiusz Miernik (A)

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Thomas Tailly (T)

Department of Urology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.

Amelia Pietropaolo (A)

Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, England.

Saeed Bin Hamri (SB)

Urology Department at Specialized Medical Center SMC2, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Athanasios Papatsoris (A)

2nd Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

Ali Serdar Gözen (AS)

Department of Urology, Medius Kliniken, Ruit, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.

Thomas R W Herrmann (TRW)

Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Department of Urology, Kantonspital Frauenfeld, Spital Thurgau AG, Frauenfeld, Switzerland.

Udo Nagele (U)

Department of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall i.T, Milser Straße 10, 6060, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group, Hall in Tirol, Austria.

Theodoros Tokas (T)

Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Medical School, Heraklion, Greece.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH