Mechanical damage in porcine dermis: Micro-mechanical model and experimental characterization.

Skin is subjected to extreme mechanical loading during needle insertion and drug delivery to the subcutaneous space. There is a rich literature on the characterization of porcine skin biomechanics as the preeminent animal model for human skin, but the emphasis has been on the elastic response and specific anatomical locations such as the dorsal and the ventral regions. During drug delivery, however, energy dissipation in the form of damage, softening, and fracture, is expected. Similarly, reports on experimental characterization are complemented by modeling efforts, but with similar gaps in microstructure-driven modeling of dissipative mechanisms. Here we contribute to the bridging of these gaps by testing porcine skin from belly and breast regions, in two different orientation with respect to anatomical axes, and to progressively higher stretches in order to show damage accumulation and stiffness degradation. We complement the mechanical test with imaging of the collagen structure and a micro-mechanics modeling framework. We found that skin from the belly is stiffer with respect to the breast region when comparing the calf stiffness of the J-shaped stress-stretch response observed in most collagenous tissues. No significant direction dependent properties were found in either anatomical location. Both locations showed energy dissipation due to damage, evident though a softening of the stress-stretch response. The microstructure model was able to capture the elastic and damage progression with a small set of parameters, some of which were determined directly from imaging. We anticipate that data and model fits can help in predictive simulations for device design in situations where skin is subject to supra-physiological deformation such as in subcutaneous drug delivery.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.