Effects of health poverty alleviation project from the perspective of vulnerability to poverty: evidence from five Chinese prefectures.
China
Health Poverty Alleviation Project
hierarchical linear regression
propensity score matching
vulnerability to poverty
Journal
Global health action
ISSN: 1654-9880
Titre abrégé: Glob Health Action
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101496665
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 12 2023
31 12 2023
Historique:
medline:
5
10
2023
pubmed:
2
10
2023
entrez:
2
10
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Health Poverty Alleviation Project (HPAP) has received widespread attention as a primary means of preventing poverty caused by illness. However, further evidence is required to confirm the effects of HPAP. This study examines the effectiveness and mechanisms of action of HPAP using data from a special survey conducted in five Chinese prefectures in 2018-2019. This study uses a three-step feasible generalised least-squares method to measure the farm households' vulnerability to poverty. Hierarchical linear regression and propensity score matching were employed to assess the poverty-reduction effects of HPAP. A mediating effects model was used to test how these policies alleviated poverty. The mean vulnerability to poverty among farm households was 0.367, with 11.89% experiencing both poverty and vulnerability, particularly in areas of deep poverty. This study has found that HPAP significantly reduces poverty and is more effective in reducing the vulnerability of non-poor farm households than poor farm households. Additionally, the results suggest that improving human capital stock and reducing medical expenditure are the two pathways through which HPAP can alleviate farm households' vulnerability to poverty. This study suggests that the vulnerability to poverty perspective should be incorporated into poverty alleviation policy formulation. HPAP enhances differentiation and precision. Thus, a long-term mechanism of HPAP should be developed.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The Health Poverty Alleviation Project (HPAP) has received widespread attention as a primary means of preventing poverty caused by illness. However, further evidence is required to confirm the effects of HPAP.
OBJECTIVE
This study examines the effectiveness and mechanisms of action of HPAP using data from a special survey conducted in five Chinese prefectures in 2018-2019.
METHOD
This study uses a three-step feasible generalised least-squares method to measure the farm households' vulnerability to poverty. Hierarchical linear regression and propensity score matching were employed to assess the poverty-reduction effects of HPAP. A mediating effects model was used to test how these policies alleviated poverty.
RESULTS
The mean vulnerability to poverty among farm households was 0.367, with 11.89% experiencing both poverty and vulnerability, particularly in areas of deep poverty. This study has found that HPAP significantly reduces poverty and is more effective in reducing the vulnerability of non-poor farm households than poor farm households. Additionally, the results suggest that improving human capital stock and reducing medical expenditure are the two pathways through which HPAP can alleviate farm households' vulnerability to poverty.
CONCLUSIONS
This study suggests that the vulnerability to poverty perspective should be incorporated into poverty alleviation policy formulation. HPAP enhances differentiation and precision. Thus, a long-term mechanism of HPAP should be developed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37779492
doi: 10.1080/16549716.2023.2260142
pmc: PMC10547439
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2260142Références
Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Nov;86(11):849-856
pubmed: 19030690
Int J Equity Health. 2020 Sep 14;19(1):161
pubmed: 32928229
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 7;13(3):e0193273
pubmed: 29513712
Health Econ Rev. 2018 Oct 13;8(1):26
pubmed: 30317395
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 28;22(1):2204
pubmed: 36443740
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Jan 6;38(1):74-82
pubmed: 36124929
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 10;19(19):
pubmed: 36232236
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 17;19(8):
pubmed: 35457745
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 29;19(7):
pubmed: 35409743