Innovative multidimensional gait evaluation using IMU in multiple sclerosis: introducing the semiogram.

gait disorders gait quantification inertial measurement unit multiple sclerosis wearable inertial sensors

Journal

Frontiers in neurology
ISSN: 1664-2295
Titre abrégé: Front Neurol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101546899

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 08 06 2023
accepted: 24 08 2023
medline: 2 10 2023
pubmed: 2 10 2023
entrez: 2 10 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Quantifying gait using inertial measurement units has gained increasing interest in recent years. Highly degraded gaits, especially in neurological impaired patients, challenge gait detection algorithms and require specific segmentation and analysis tools. Thus, the outcomes of these devices must be rigorously tested for both robustness and relevancy in order to recommend their routine use. In this study, we propose a multidimensional score to quantify and visualize gait, which can be used in neurological routine follow-up. We assessed the reliability and clinical coherence of this method in a group of severely disabled patients with progressive multiple sclerosis (pMS), who display highly degraded gait patterns, as well as in an age-matched healthy subjects (HS) group. Twenty-two participants with pMS and nineteen HS were included in this 18-month longitudinal follow-up study. During the follow-up period, all participants completed a 10-meter walk test with a U-turn and back, twice at M0, M6, M12, and M18. Average speed and seven clinical criteria (sturdiness, springiness, steadiness, stability, smoothness, synchronization, and symmetry) were evaluated using 17 gait parameters selected from the literature. The variation of these parameters from HS values was combined to generate a multidimensional visual tool, referred to as a semiogram. For both cohorts, all criteria showed moderate to very high test-retest reliability for intra-session measurements. Inter-session quantification was also moderate to highly reliable for all criteria except smoothness, which was not reliable for HS participants. All partial scores, except for the stability score, differed between the two populations. All partial scores were correlated with an objective but not subjective quantification of gait severity in the pMS population. A deficit in the pyramidal tract was associated with altered scores in all criteria, whereas deficits in cerebellar, sensitive, bulbar, and cognitive deficits were associated with decreased scores in only a subset of gait criteria. The proposed multidimensional gait quantification represents an innovative approach to monitoring gait disorders. It provides a reliable and informative biomarker for assessing the severity of gait impairments in individuals with pMS. Additionally, it holds the potential for discriminating between various underlying causes of gait alterations in pMS.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Quantifying gait using inertial measurement units has gained increasing interest in recent years. Highly degraded gaits, especially in neurological impaired patients, challenge gait detection algorithms and require specific segmentation and analysis tools. Thus, the outcomes of these devices must be rigorously tested for both robustness and relevancy in order to recommend their routine use. In this study, we propose a multidimensional score to quantify and visualize gait, which can be used in neurological routine follow-up. We assessed the reliability and clinical coherence of this method in a group of severely disabled patients with progressive multiple sclerosis (pMS), who display highly degraded gait patterns, as well as in an age-matched healthy subjects (HS) group.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Twenty-two participants with pMS and nineteen HS were included in this 18-month longitudinal follow-up study. During the follow-up period, all participants completed a 10-meter walk test with a U-turn and back, twice at M0, M6, M12, and M18. Average speed and seven clinical criteria (sturdiness, springiness, steadiness, stability, smoothness, synchronization, and symmetry) were evaluated using 17 gait parameters selected from the literature. The variation of these parameters from HS values was combined to generate a multidimensional visual tool, referred to as a semiogram.
Results UNASSIGNED
For both cohorts, all criteria showed moderate to very high test-retest reliability for intra-session measurements. Inter-session quantification was also moderate to highly reliable for all criteria except smoothness, which was not reliable for HS participants. All partial scores, except for the stability score, differed between the two populations. All partial scores were correlated with an objective but not subjective quantification of gait severity in the pMS population. A deficit in the pyramidal tract was associated with altered scores in all criteria, whereas deficits in cerebellar, sensitive, bulbar, and cognitive deficits were associated with decreased scores in only a subset of gait criteria.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
The proposed multidimensional gait quantification represents an innovative approach to monitoring gait disorders. It provides a reliable and informative biomarker for assessing the severity of gait impairments in individuals with pMS. Additionally, it holds the potential for discriminating between various underlying causes of gait alterations in pMS.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37780706
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1237162
pmc: PMC10540441
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1237162

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Voisard, de l'Escalopier, Vienne-Jumeau, Moreau, Quijoux, Bompaire, Sallansonnet, Brechemier, Taifas, Tafani, Drouard, Vayatis, Ricard and Oudre.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Mar;63(2):138-147
pubmed: 31421274
Gait Posture. 2004 Jun;19(3):288-97
pubmed: 15125918
Ann Neurol. 2011 Feb;69(2):292-302
pubmed: 21387374
PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e60684
pubmed: 23560103
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 19;12(10):e0185741
pubmed: 29049403
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018 Jan;19:129-133
pubmed: 29216541
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Dec 19;20(1):
pubmed: 31861630
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Jun 18;15(1):49
pubmed: 29914518
Front Physiol. 2020 Jun 10;11:540
pubmed: 32587523
PLoS One. 2022 May 13;17(5):e0268475
pubmed: 35560328
Gait Posture. 2017 Oct;58:307-309
pubmed: 28858779
BMC Neurol. 2021 Sep 4;21(1):337
pubmed: 34481481
J Biomech. 2013 Feb 22;46(4):828-31
pubmed: 23317758
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019 Sep 5;16(1):110
pubmed: 31488184
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Dec 18;17(1):165
pubmed: 33339530
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 16;10(4):e0123822
pubmed: 25879750
J Neurol. 2016 Sep;263(9):1796-801
pubmed: 27314963
Front Psychol. 2017 May 18;8:817
pubmed: 28572784
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015 Dec 09;12:112
pubmed: 26651329
J Biomech. 2017 Feb 28;53:84-89
pubmed: 28104246
Front Neurol. 2017 May 15;8:194
pubmed: 28555124
Int J MS Care. 2011 Spring;13(1):4-14
pubmed: 24453700
Neurology. 2015 May 19;84(20):2048-56
pubmed: 25878185
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 7;10(1):2091
pubmed: 32034244
Gait Posture. 2020 Mar;77:214-217
pubmed: 32058286
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8
pubmed: 18839484
Mult Scler. 2006 Oct;12(5):594-8
pubmed: 17086905
Mult Scler Int. 2014;2014:649390
pubmed: 24999434
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 10;11(2):e0148997
pubmed: 26863109
Gait Posture. 2009 Jan;29(1):138-42
pubmed: 18951800
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2016 Nov;10:187-191
pubmed: 27919488
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 22;16(4):e0250100
pubmed: 33886640
BMC Neurol. 2014 Mar 25;14:58
pubmed: 24666846
Mult Scler. 2008 Aug;14(7):988-91
pubmed: 18505775
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Dec 31;18(1):186
pubmed: 34972526
Gait Posture. 2017 Jan;51:25-35
pubmed: 27693958
J Neurol. 2020 Jul;267(7):1912-1921
pubmed: 32166481
Mult Scler Int. 2021 Jun 03;2021:5589562
pubmed: 34123427
Mult Scler. 2012 Jul;18(7):914-24
pubmed: 22740603
Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 8;8(1):15
pubmed: 30621765
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015 Feb 10;12:14
pubmed: 25890382
Front Neurol. 2023 Apr 20;14:1164001
pubmed: 37153677
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019 Feb;27(2):248-256
pubmed: 30445222
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Jan 14;8:558771
pubmed: 33520949
Gerontologist. 2006 Jun;46(3):367-76
pubmed: 16731875
J Biomech. 2009 Jul 22;42(10):1506-1512
pubmed: 19446294
J Neurol Sci. 2015 Nov 15;358(1-2):339-44
pubmed: 26409825
Mult Scler. 2006 Oct;12(5):620-8
pubmed: 17086909
Neurology. 1990 Jun;40(6):971-5
pubmed: 2189084
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016 May 12;13(1):46
pubmed: 27175731
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Sep 12;18(1):93
pubmed: 30208858
J Eval Clin Pract. 2014 Aug;20(4):295-300
pubmed: 24798823
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 7;12(1):3653
pubmed: 35256705

Auteurs

Cyril Voisard (C)

Université Paris Saclay, Université Paris Cité, Ecole Normale Supérieure Paris Saclay, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Service de Santé des Armées, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre Borelli, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Service de Neurologie, Service de Santé des Armées, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy, Clamart, France.

Nicolas de l'Escalopier (N)

Université Paris Cité, Université Paris Saclay, Ecole Normale Supérieure Paris Saclay, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Service de Santé des Armées, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre Borelli, Paris, France.
Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Traumatologique et Réparatrice des Membres, Service de Santé des Armées, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy, Clamart, France.

Aliénor Vienne-Jumeau (A)

Université Paris Saclay, Université Paris Cité, Ecole Normale Supérieure Paris Saclay, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Service de Santé des Armées, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre Borelli, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

Albane Moreau (A)

Université Paris Saclay, Université Paris Cité, Ecole Normale Supérieure Paris Saclay, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Service de Santé des Armées, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre Borelli, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

Flavien Quijoux (F)

Université Paris Saclay, Université Paris Cité, Ecole Normale Supérieure Paris Saclay, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Service de Santé des Armées, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre Borelli, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

Flavie Bompaire (F)

Service de Neurologie, Service de Santé des Armées, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy, Clamart, France.
Université Paris Cité, Université Paris Saclay, Ecole Normale Supérieure Paris Saclay, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Service de Santé des Armées, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre Borelli, Paris, France.

Magali Sallansonnet (M)

Service de Neurologie, Service de Santé des Armées, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy, Clamart, France.

Marie-Laure Brechemier (ML)

Service de Neurologie, Service de Santé des Armées, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy, Clamart, France.

Irina Taifas (I)

Service de Neurologie, Service de Santé des Armées, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy, Clamart, France.

Camille Tafani (C)

Service de Neurologie, Service de Santé des Armées, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy, Clamart, France.

Eve Drouard (E)

Service de Neurologie, Service de Santé des Armées, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy, Clamart, France.

Nicolas Vayatis (N)

Université Paris Saclay, Université Paris Cité, Ecole Normale Supérieure Paris Saclay, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Service de Santé des Armées, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre Borelli, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

Damien Ricard (D)

Service de Neurologie, Service de Santé des Armées, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Percy, Clamart, France.
Université Paris Cité, Université Paris Saclay, Ecole Normale Supérieure Paris Saclay, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Service de Santé des Armées, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre Borelli, Paris, France.
Ecole du Val-de-Grâce, Service de Santé des Armées, Paris, France.

Laurent Oudre (L)

Université Paris Saclay, Université Paris Cité, Ecole Normale Supérieure Paris Saclay, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Service de Santé des Armées, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Centre Borelli, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

Classifications MeSH