Combined therapy with ibrutinib and bortezomib followed by ibrutinib maintenance in relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma and high-risk features: a phase 1/2 trial of the European MCL network (SAKK 36/13).
Bortezomib
High risk biology
Ibrutinib
Mantle cell lymphoma
Journal
EClinicalMedicine
ISSN: 2589-5370
Titre abrégé: EClinicalMedicine
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101733727
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
18
05
2023
revised:
15
08
2023
accepted:
01
09
2023
medline:
2
10
2023
pubmed:
2
10
2023
entrez:
2
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib and the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib have single-agent activity, non-overlapping toxicities, and regulatory approval in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). In vitro, their combination provides synergistic cytotoxicity. In this investigator-initiated phase 1/2 trial, we established the recommended phase 2 dose of ibrutinib in combination with bortezomib, and assessed its efficacy in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL. In this phase 1/2 study open in 15 sites in Switzerland, Germany and Italy, patients with relapsed or refractory MCL after ≤2 lines of chemotherapy and both ibrutinib-naïve and bortezomib-naïve received six cycles of ibrutinibb and bortezomib, followed by ibrutinib maintenance. For the phase 1 study, a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation design was used to determine the recommended phase 2 dose of ibrutinib in combination with bortezomib. The primary endpoint in phase 1 was the dose limiting toxicities in cycle 1. The phase 2 study was an open-label, single-arm trial with a Simon's two-stage min-max design, with a primary endpoint of overall response rate (ORR) assessed by CT/MRI. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02356458. Between August 2015 and September 2016, nine patients were treated in the phase 1 study, and 49 patients were treated between November 2016 and March 2020 in the phase 2 of the trial. The ORR was 81.8% (90% CI 71.1, 89.8%, CR(u) 21.8%) which increased with continued ibrutinib (median 10.6 months) to 87.3%, (CR(u) 41.8%). 75.6% of patients had at least one high-risk feature (Ki-67 > 30%, blastoid or pleomorphic variant, p53 overexpression, The combination of ibrutinib and bortezomib shows durable efficacy in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL, also in the presence of high-risk features. SAKK (Hubacher Fund), Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation, Swiss Cancer Research Foundation, and Janssen.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
The Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib and the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib have single-agent activity, non-overlapping toxicities, and regulatory approval in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). In vitro, their combination provides synergistic cytotoxicity. In this investigator-initiated phase 1/2 trial, we established the recommended phase 2 dose of ibrutinib in combination with bortezomib, and assessed its efficacy in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
In this phase 1/2 study open in 15 sites in Switzerland, Germany and Italy, patients with relapsed or refractory MCL after ≤2 lines of chemotherapy and both ibrutinib-naïve and bortezomib-naïve received six cycles of ibrutinibb and bortezomib, followed by ibrutinib maintenance. For the phase 1 study, a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation design was used to determine the recommended phase 2 dose of ibrutinib in combination with bortezomib. The primary endpoint in phase 1 was the dose limiting toxicities in cycle 1. The phase 2 study was an open-label, single-arm trial with a Simon's two-stage min-max design, with a primary endpoint of overall response rate (ORR) assessed by CT/MRI. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02356458.
Findings
UNASSIGNED
Between August 2015 and September 2016, nine patients were treated in the phase 1 study, and 49 patients were treated between November 2016 and March 2020 in the phase 2 of the trial. The ORR was 81.8% (90% CI 71.1, 89.8%, CR(u) 21.8%) which increased with continued ibrutinib (median 10.6 months) to 87.3%, (CR(u) 41.8%). 75.6% of patients had at least one high-risk feature (Ki-67 > 30%, blastoid or pleomorphic variant, p53 overexpression,
Interpretation
UNASSIGNED
The combination of ibrutinib and bortezomib shows durable efficacy in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL, also in the presence of high-risk features.
Funding
UNASSIGNED
SAKK (Hubacher Fund), Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation, Swiss Cancer Research Foundation, and Janssen.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37781158
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102221
pii: S2589-5370(23)00398-X
pmc: PMC10541470
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02356458']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
102221Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
U.N. reports consulting fees and advisory board participation to/through the institution from and with Janssen-Cilag, Celgene (BMS), Takeda, AstraZeneca, Roche, Novartis, Incyte, Beigene, Kyowa Kirin, Gilead, Pierre Fabre and Miltenyi, payment of honoraria to the institution form Celgene (BMS), Novartis, Takeda, and Gilead, and meeting and/or travel support to the institution from Janssen, Roche, Gilead and Takeda. M.D. reports grants or contracts for research from Abbvie, Bayer, BMS/Celgene, Gilead/Kite, Janssen, and Roche to the institution, payment of honoraria from AstraZeneca, Beigene, Gilead/Kite, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis and Roche, meeting and/or travel support from Janssen and Roche, and Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Boards with Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, BMS/Celgene, Gilead/Kite, Janssen, Lilly/Loxo, Novartis, and Roche. C.S. reports consulting fees from BMS and Janssen, payments of honoraria from BMS and AstraZeneca, and meeting and/or travel support from Kite Gilead. E.D. reports and research funding from ADC Therapeutics and Takeda, consulting fees from Roche, Beigene, Abbvie, AstraZeneca, and Takeda, payments or honoraria from Abbvie, Roche, Incyte and Beigene, support for meetings and/or travel from Abbvie and Beigene, a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board role with Abbvie, Beigene, Takeda, and Roche, and the receipt of equipment, materials, drugs, medical writing, gifts or other services from ADC Therapeutics. T.Z. reports consulting fees from Beigene Switzerland GmbH. G.H. reports grants or contracts for research from Gilead/Kite, Incyte, Janssen, Morphosys, Pfizer, Roche, and Abbvie, consulting fees from Abbvie, ADC Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, BMS, Genmab, Gilead/Kite, Incyte, Janssen, Miltenyi, Novartis, Roche, and Lilly, payments or honoraria from Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, BMS, Genmab, Gilead, Incyte, Janssen, Lilly, and Roche, meeting and/or travel support from Janssen and Gilead/Kite, and Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Boards with Miltenyi. U.M. reports meeting and/or travel support from Janssen-Cilag, an advisory board role with Janssen-Cilag, and participation in the committee of the German-Swiss-Austrian guidelines for mantle cell lymphoma. S.F. reports grants or contracts for research, consulting fees, honoraria, meeting and/or travel support, and advisory board activities from and with Janssen. S.B. reports grants or contracts for research from Janssen-Cilag Neuss and Miltenyi Bergisch Gladbach to the institution, honoraria from Roche, Abbvie, Janssen, AstraZeneca, and Sanofi, and a travel support from Janssen. E.Z. reports grants or contracts for research from AstraZeneca, Beigene, Celgene, Incyte, Janssen, and Roche, for research to the institution from Incyte, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Celgene/BMS, Merck/MSD, and Roche, honoraria for an educational event from Abbvie, an advisory board role with Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Celgene/BMS, Celltrion Healthcare, Curis, Eli Lilly, Gilead/Kite, Incyte, Ipsen, Janssen, MeiPharma, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Merck/MSD, and Roche, Data Safety Monitoring Board activities with Merck/MSD, and meeting and/or travel support from Abbvie, Gilead/Kite, Janssen, and Roche, and an expert statement for Bristol Myers Squib. C.R. reports consulting fees to the institution from Abbvie, Celgene/BMS, and Roche, honoraria to the institution from Amgen, Janssen, Abbvie, Celgene/BMS, and Takeda, payment for expert testimonies to the institution from Gilead and Janssen, and meeting and/or travel support from Sanofi and Amgen. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Références
Hemasphere. 2022 Apr 13;6(5):e712
pubmed: 35441128
Blood. 2006 Jan 1;107(1):257-64
pubmed: 16166592
Lancet Oncol. 2022 Mar;23(3):406-415
pubmed: 35074072
J Hematol Oncol. 2021 Oct 30;14(1):179
pubmed: 34717692
Leukemia. 2019 Nov;33(11):2762-2766
pubmed: 31558766
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017 Jun 13;11:1719-1728
pubmed: 28670108
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Nov;19(11):1449-1458
pubmed: 30348538
Blood. 2018 Jan 25;131(4):417-420
pubmed: 29196411
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Dec 20;38(36):4302-4316
pubmed: 33074750
N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 29;378(13):1211-1223
pubmed: 29590547
N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 8;369(6):507-16
pubmed: 23782157
Br J Haematol. 2013 Apr;161(1):43-56
pubmed: 23360303
J Clin Oncol. 1999 Apr;17(4):1244
pubmed: 10561185
Lancet. 2021 Mar 6;397(10277):892-901
pubmed: 33676628
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Oct 20;24(30):4867-74
pubmed: 17001068
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jun 30;386(26):2495-2506
pubmed: 35767440
Blood. 2022 May 26;139(21):3148-3158
pubmed: 35303070
Blood. 2017 Oct 26;130(17):1903-1910
pubmed: 28819011
Leukemia. 2018 Aug;32(8):1799-1803
pubmed: 29572505
Haematologica. 2019 May;104(5):e211-e214
pubmed: 30442728
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jan;17(1):48-56
pubmed: 26640039
Br J Haematol. 2017 Nov;179(3):430-438
pubmed: 28832957
Blood Adv. 2022 Mar 8;6(5):1490-1498
pubmed: 34700344
Br J Haematol. 2020 Dec;191(5):796-805
pubmed: 32748433
Br J Haematol. 2009 Sep;146(6):652-5
pubmed: 19624539
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jun 30;386(26):2482-2494
pubmed: 35657079
J Hematol Oncol. 2021 Oct 14;14(1):167
pubmed: 34649571