Efficacy of occupational rehabilitation in return to work for back pain: A systematic literature review.
Back pain
occupational therapy
return to work
vocational rehabilitation
work disability
workplace intervention
Journal
Work (Reading, Mass.)
ISSN: 1875-9270
Titre abrégé: Work
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9204382
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Sep 2023
28 Sep 2023
Historique:
medline:
2
10
2023
pubmed:
2
10
2023
entrez:
2
10
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Currently, there is no standard procedure for a return to work (RTW) rehabilitation program used by practitioners. The aim is to investigate the efficacy of occupational rehabilitation programs for workers with back pain. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts and full-text articles in a systematic literature search in three databases conducted in 2023. Subsequently, they extracted data according to the PRISMA Statement. Among the 4,010 articles retrieved, 20 met the inclusion criteria. Data from accepted studies were abstracted into tables relating to the RTW, improvement of pain intensity, quality of life (QOL), and degree of disability in persons with back pain. The risk of bias was assessed using the (SIGN)-criteria. Significant improvements in RTW were shown by a workplace intervention with a physical approach and a multidisciplinary intervention but with a wide range of effect sizes. Five studies showed significant improvements in pain intensity and QOL, six studies observed significant improvements in disability. The studies that stated positive effects on work-related data differed between intervention programs and traditional care. A combination of activity, maintenance therapy, stretching, and manual therapy showed promising results in improving RTW. In addition, the relationship and mediation between employer/workplace and employee seems to be an important aspect of RTW. However, pain intensity, disability, and QOL were enhanced with interventions that included a high proportion of physical activity. However, the intervention programs differed widely, leading to the assumption that the treatment effect of the intervention programs is not established, yet.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Currently, there is no standard procedure for a return to work (RTW) rehabilitation program used by practitioners.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The aim is to investigate the efficacy of occupational rehabilitation programs for workers with back pain.
METHODS
METHODS
Two independent reviewers screened abstracts and full-text articles in a systematic literature search in three databases conducted in 2023. Subsequently, they extracted data according to the PRISMA Statement.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among the 4,010 articles retrieved, 20 met the inclusion criteria. Data from accepted studies were abstracted into tables relating to the RTW, improvement of pain intensity, quality of life (QOL), and degree of disability in persons with back pain. The risk of bias was assessed using the (SIGN)-criteria. Significant improvements in RTW were shown by a workplace intervention with a physical approach and a multidisciplinary intervention but with a wide range of effect sizes. Five studies showed significant improvements in pain intensity and QOL, six studies observed significant improvements in disability.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The studies that stated positive effects on work-related data differed between intervention programs and traditional care. A combination of activity, maintenance therapy, stretching, and manual therapy showed promising results in improving RTW. In addition, the relationship and mediation between employer/workplace and employee seems to be an important aspect of RTW. However, pain intensity, disability, and QOL were enhanced with interventions that included a high proportion of physical activity. However, the intervention programs differed widely, leading to the assumption that the treatment effect of the intervention programs is not established, yet.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37781855
pii: WOR230277
doi: 10.3233/WOR-230277
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM