Efficacy of occupational rehabilitation in return to work for back pain: A systematic literature review.

Back pain occupational therapy return to work vocational rehabilitation work disability workplace intervention

Journal

Work (Reading, Mass.)
ISSN: 1875-9270
Titre abrégé: Work
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9204382

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Sep 2023
Historique:
medline: 2 10 2023
pubmed: 2 10 2023
entrez: 2 10 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Currently, there is no standard procedure for a return to work (RTW) rehabilitation program used by practitioners. The aim is to investigate the efficacy of occupational rehabilitation programs for workers with back pain. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts and full-text articles in a systematic literature search in three databases conducted in 2023. Subsequently, they extracted data according to the PRISMA Statement. Among the 4,010 articles retrieved, 20 met the inclusion criteria. Data from accepted studies were abstracted into tables relating to the RTW, improvement of pain intensity, quality of life (QOL), and degree of disability in persons with back pain. The risk of bias was assessed using the (SIGN)-criteria. Significant improvements in RTW were shown by a workplace intervention with a physical approach and a multidisciplinary intervention but with a wide range of effect sizes. Five studies showed significant improvements in pain intensity and QOL, six studies observed significant improvements in disability. The studies that stated positive effects on work-related data differed between intervention programs and traditional care. A combination of activity, maintenance therapy, stretching, and manual therapy showed promising results in improving RTW. In addition, the relationship and mediation between employer/workplace and employee seems to be an important aspect of RTW. However, pain intensity, disability, and QOL were enhanced with interventions that included a high proportion of physical activity. However, the intervention programs differed widely, leading to the assumption that the treatment effect of the intervention programs is not established, yet.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Currently, there is no standard procedure for a return to work (RTW) rehabilitation program used by practitioners.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
The aim is to investigate the efficacy of occupational rehabilitation programs for workers with back pain.
METHODS METHODS
Two independent reviewers screened abstracts and full-text articles in a systematic literature search in three databases conducted in 2023. Subsequently, they extracted data according to the PRISMA Statement.
RESULTS RESULTS
Among the 4,010 articles retrieved, 20 met the inclusion criteria. Data from accepted studies were abstracted into tables relating to the RTW, improvement of pain intensity, quality of life (QOL), and degree of disability in persons with back pain. The risk of bias was assessed using the (SIGN)-criteria. Significant improvements in RTW were shown by a workplace intervention with a physical approach and a multidisciplinary intervention but with a wide range of effect sizes. Five studies showed significant improvements in pain intensity and QOL, six studies observed significant improvements in disability.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The studies that stated positive effects on work-related data differed between intervention programs and traditional care. A combination of activity, maintenance therapy, stretching, and manual therapy showed promising results in improving RTW. In addition, the relationship and mediation between employer/workplace and employee seems to be an important aspect of RTW. However, pain intensity, disability, and QOL were enhanced with interventions that included a high proportion of physical activity. However, the intervention programs differed widely, leading to the assumption that the treatment effect of the intervention programs is not established, yet.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37781855
pii: WOR230277
doi: 10.3233/WOR-230277
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Linda Kalski (L)

Institute of Sports Science, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Sports Medicine, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Laura Völkel (L)

Institute of Sports Science, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Sports Medicine, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Sarah Häußler (S)

Institute of Sports Science, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Bernd Wolfarth (B)

Institute of Sports Science, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Sports Medicine, Charité -Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Classifications MeSH