Prenatal risk factors and postnatal cannabis exposure: Assessing dual models of schizophrenia-like rodents.
Cannabinoid
Environmental
Maternal immune activation
Mouse
Rat
Stress
Tetrahydrocannabinol
Journal
Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews
ISSN: 1873-7528
Titre abrégé: Neurosci Biobehav Rev
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7806090
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
22
05
2023
revised:
04
09
2023
accepted:
24
09
2023
medline:
6
11
2023
pubmed:
3
10
2023
entrez:
2
10
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Schizophrenia (SCZ) is a multifactorial neurodevelopmental disorder caused by genetic and environmental alterations, especially during prenatal stages. On the other hand, cannabis consumption in adolescence has been also linked to an increased risk of developing SCZ. The combination of both hits has been proposed as the dual hit hypothesis of SCZ. We systematically reviewed prenatal environmental alterations and cannabis consumption during adolescence that are associated with an increased risk of SCZ, following the PRISMA model. The analysis focused on dual animal models where the first hit is prenatal environmental exposure and the second hit consists of postnatal cannabis exposure. The articles were evaluated by three independent reviewers based on inclusion criteria. We extracted the first author´s name, year, model species, sex and analysis. The articles reported on dual murine models and their effects on weight, behavior, genetics, electrophysiology and brain structure and function. We conclude that the defects caused by the dual hits depend on the sex of the model, as well as type of hits.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37783300
pii: S0149-7634(23)00378-0
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105409
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
105409Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported in this article.