Preoperative fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis as a predictor of tumor recurrence in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a bi-institutional study.
Fluorescence in situ hybridization
Nomogram
Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
Recurrence
Journal
Journal of translational medicine
ISSN: 1479-5876
Titre abrégé: J Transl Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101190741
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 10 2023
02 10 2023
Historique:
received:
21
04
2023
accepted:
15
09
2023
revised:
22
08
2023
medline:
4
10
2023
pubmed:
3
10
2023
entrez:
2
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is known for its elevated recurrence rate, necessitating an enhancement in the current risk stratification for recurrence. The urine-based fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay has emerged as a noninvasive auxiliary tool for detecting bladder cancer. The aim of this study was to explore the potential relationship between the preoperative FISH assay and recurrence, and to develop a FISH-clinical nomogram for predicting the recurrence-free survival (RFS) in NMIBC patients. In total, 332 eligible patients were enrolled from two hospitals. The SYSMH cohort was randomly assigned to the training set (n = 168) and the validation set I (n = 72) at a ratio of 7:3, while the SYSUTH cohort was allocated to the validation set II (n = 92). The correlation between the preoperative FISH assay and recurrence was determined through the Cox regression analysis. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression algorithm was used for model construction. The performance of the model was assessed by its discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness. We uncovered that chromosome 7 aneuploidy, p16 locus loss, number of the positive FISH sites, and the FISH test result were significantly associated with tumor recurrence. Then, a FISH-clinical nomogram incorporating the FISH test result, T stage, associated CIS, tumor grade, and tumor status was developed. It showed favorable calibration and discrimination with a C-index of 0.683 (95%CI, 0.611-0.756) in the training set, which was confirmed in the validation set I and validation set II with C-indexes of 0.665 (95%CI, 0.565-0.765) and 0.778 (95%CI, 0.665-0.891), respectively. Decision curve analysis revealed the clinical usefulness of the nomogram. Moreover, our proposed nomogram significantly outperformed the guideline-recommended EORTC and CUETO scoring models. Our study confirmed the prognostic value of the preoperative FISH assay and proposed a FISH-clinical nomogram to predict RFS in NMIBC patients. Our nomogram can serve as a more precise tool for recurrence risk stratification, which may optimize disease management in bladder cancer and improve patient prognosis.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is known for its elevated recurrence rate, necessitating an enhancement in the current risk stratification for recurrence. The urine-based fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay has emerged as a noninvasive auxiliary tool for detecting bladder cancer. The aim of this study was to explore the potential relationship between the preoperative FISH assay and recurrence, and to develop a FISH-clinical nomogram for predicting the recurrence-free survival (RFS) in NMIBC patients.
METHODS
In total, 332 eligible patients were enrolled from two hospitals. The SYSMH cohort was randomly assigned to the training set (n = 168) and the validation set I (n = 72) at a ratio of 7:3, while the SYSUTH cohort was allocated to the validation set II (n = 92). The correlation between the preoperative FISH assay and recurrence was determined through the Cox regression analysis. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression algorithm was used for model construction. The performance of the model was assessed by its discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness.
RESULTS
We uncovered that chromosome 7 aneuploidy, p16 locus loss, number of the positive FISH sites, and the FISH test result were significantly associated with tumor recurrence. Then, a FISH-clinical nomogram incorporating the FISH test result, T stage, associated CIS, tumor grade, and tumor status was developed. It showed favorable calibration and discrimination with a C-index of 0.683 (95%CI, 0.611-0.756) in the training set, which was confirmed in the validation set I and validation set II with C-indexes of 0.665 (95%CI, 0.565-0.765) and 0.778 (95%CI, 0.665-0.891), respectively. Decision curve analysis revealed the clinical usefulness of the nomogram. Moreover, our proposed nomogram significantly outperformed the guideline-recommended EORTC and CUETO scoring models.
CONCLUSION
Our study confirmed the prognostic value of the preoperative FISH assay and proposed a FISH-clinical nomogram to predict RFS in NMIBC patients. Our nomogram can serve as a more precise tool for recurrence risk stratification, which may optimize disease management in bladder cancer and improve patient prognosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37784106
doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04528-2
pii: 10.1186/s12967-023-04528-2
pmc: PMC10546664
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
685Informations de copyright
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49.
pubmed: 33538338
Funt SA, Rosenberg JE. Systemic, perioperative management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer and future horizons. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14:221–34.
pubmed: 27874062
Babjuk M, Burger M, Capoun O, Cohen D, Compérat EM, Dominguez Escrig JL, Gontero P, Liedberg F, Masson-Lecomte A, Mostafid AH, et al. European association of urology guidelines on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (Ta, T1, and carcinoma in situ). Eur Urol. 2022;81:75–94.
pubmed: 34511303
Oddens J, Brausi M, Sylvester R, Bono A, van de Beek C, van Andel G, Gontero P, Hoeltl W, Turkeri L, Marreaud S, et al. Final results of an EORTC-GU cancers group randomized study of maintenance bacillus Calmette-Guérin in intermediate- and high-risk Ta, T1 papillary carcinoma of the urinary bladder: one-third dose versus full dose and 1 year versus 3 years of maintenance. Eur Urol. 2013;63:462–72.
pubmed: 23141049
Heney NM, Ahmed S, Flanagan MJ, Frable W, Corder MP, Hafermann MD, Hawkins IR. Superficial bladder cancer: progression and recurrence. J Urol. 1983;130:1083–6.
pubmed: 6644886
Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Bouffioux C, Denis L, Newling DW, Kurth K. Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol. 2006;49:466–465 (discussion 475–467).
pubmed: 16442208
Fernandez-Gomez J, Madero R, Solsona E, Unda M, Martinez-Piñeiro L, Gonzalez M, Portillo J, Ojea A, Pertusa C, Rodriguez-Molina J, et al. Predicting nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer recurrence and progression in patients treated with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin: the CUETO scoring model. J Urol. 2009;182:2195–203.
pubmed: 19758621
Jobczyk M, Stawiski K, Fendler W, Różański W. Validation of EORTC, CUETO, and EAU risk stratification in prediction of recurrence, progression, and death of patients with initially non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC): a cohort analysis. Cancer Med. 2020;9:4014–25.
pubmed: 32216043
pmcid: 7286464
Xylinas E, Kent M, Kluth L, Pycha A, Comploj E, Svatek RS, Lotan Y, Trinh QD, Karakiewicz PI, Holmang S, et al. Accuracy of the EORTC risk tables and of the CUETO scoring model to predict outcomes in non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Br J Cancer. 2013;109:1460–6.
pubmed: 23982601
pmcid: 3776972
Ravvaz K, Walz ME, Weissert JA, Downs TM. Predicting nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer recurrence and progression in a United States population. J Urol. 2017;198:824–31.
pubmed: 28433642
Soria F, Droller MJ, Lotan Y, Gontero P, D’Andrea D, Gust KM, Rouprêt M, Babjuk M, Palou J, Shariat SF. An up-to-date catalog of available urinary biomarkers for the surveillance of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. World J Urol. 2018;36:1981–95.
pubmed: 29931526
pmcid: 6280823
Sokolova IA, Halling KC, Jenkins RB, Burkhardt HM, Meyer RG, Seelig SA, King W. The development of a multitarget, multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization assay for the detection of urothelial carcinoma in urine. J Mol Diagn. 2000;2:116–23.
pubmed: 11229514
pmcid: 1906906
Sarosdy MF, Schellhammer P, Bokinsky G, Kahn P, Chao R, Yore L, Zadra J, Burzon D, Osher G, Bridge JA, et al. Clinical evaluation of a multi-target fluorescent in situ hybridization assay for detection of bladder cancer. J Urol. 2002;168:1950–4.
pubmed: 12394683
Lin T, Liu Z, Liu L, Yang L, Han P, Zhang P, Wei Q. Prospective evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization for diagnosing urothelial carcinoma. Oncol Lett. 2017;13:3928–34.
pubmed: 28529600
pmcid: 5431676
Halling KC, Kipp BR. Bladder cancer detection using FISH (UroVysion assay). Adv Anat Pathol. 2008;15:279–86.
pubmed: 18724101
Diao X, Cai J, Zheng J, Kong J, Wu S, Yu H, Huang H, Xie W, Chen X, Huang C, et al. Association of chromosome 7 aneuploidy measured by fluorescence in situ hybridization assay with muscular invasion in bladder cancer. Cancer Commun (Lond). 2020;40:167–80.
pubmed: 32279463
pmcid: 7170658
Lotan Y, Inman BA, Davis LG, Kassouf W, Messing E, Daneshmand S, Canter D, Marble HT, Joseph AM, Jewell S, Boorjian SA. Evaluation of the fluorescence in situ hybridization test to Predict recurrence and/or progression of disease after bacillus Calmette-Guérin for primary high grade nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer: results from a prospective multicenter trial. J Urol. 2019;202:920–6.
pubmed: 31120373
Liem E, Oddens JR, Vernooij RWM, Li R, Kamat A, Dinney CP, Mengual L, Alcaraz A, Izquierdo L, Savic S, et al. The role of fluorescence in situ hybridization for predicting recurrence after adjuvant Bacillus Calmette-Guérin in patients with intermediate and high risk nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. J Urol. 2020;203:283–91.
pubmed: 31549936
Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 1996;58:267–88.
Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996;15:361–87.
pubmed: 8668867
Camp RL, Dolled-Filhart M, Rimm DL. X-tile: a new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:7252–9.
pubmed: 15534099
Chen X, Zhang J, Ruan W, Huang M, Wang C, Wang H, Jiang Z, Wang S, Liu Z, Liu C, et al. Urine DNA methylation assay enables early detection and recurrence mon itoring for bladder cancer. J Clin Investig. 2020;130:6278–89.
pubmed: 32817589
pmcid: 7685755
Placer J, Espinet B, Salido M, Solé F, Gelabert-Mas A. Clinical utility of a multiprobe FISH assay in voided urine specimens for the detection of bladder cancer and its recurrences, compared with urinary cytology. Eur Urol. 2002;42:547–52.
pubmed: 12477649
Glass RE, Coutsouvelis C, Sheikh-Fayyaz S, Chau K, Rosen L, Brenkert R, Slim F, Epelbaum F, Das K, Cocker RS. Two-tiered subdivision of atypia on urine cytology can improve patient follow-up and optimize the utility of UroVysion. Cancer Cytopathol. 2016;124:188–95.
pubmed: 26430812
Chou R, Gore JL, Buckley D, Fu R, Gustafson K, Griffin JC, Grusing S, Selph S. Urinary biomarkers for diagnosis of bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163:922–31.
pubmed: 26501851
Schlomer BJ, Ho R, Sagalowsky A, Ashfaq R, Lotan Y. Prospective validation of the clinical usefulness of reflex fluorescence in situ hybridization assay in patients with atypical cytology for the detection of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. J Urol. 2010;183:62–7.
pubmed: 19913822
Ke C, Liu Z, Zhu J, Zeng X, Hu Z, Yang C. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to predict the efficacy of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin perfusion in bladder cancer. Transl Cancer Res. 2022;11:3448–57.
pubmed: 36388029
pmcid: 9641077
Moonen PM, Merkx GF, Peelen P, Karthaus HF, Smeets DF, Witjes JA. UroVysion compared with cytology and quantitative cytology in the surveillance of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2007;51:1275–80 (discussion 1280).
pubmed: 17084511
Khalilov R. A comprehensive review of advanced nano-biomaterials in regenerative medicine and drug delivery. Adv Biology Earth Sci. 2023;8:5–18.
Eftekhari A, Kryschi C, Pamies D, Gulec S, Ahmadian E, Janas D, Davaran S, Khalilov R. Natural and synthetic nanovectors for cancer therapy. Nanotheranostics. 2023;7:236–57.
pubmed: 37064613
pmcid: 10093418
Waldman FM, Carroll PR, Kerschmann R, Cohen MB, Field FG, Mayall BH. Centromeric copy number of chromosome 7 is strongly correlated with tumor grade and labeling index in human bladder cancer. Cancer Res. 1991;51:3807–13.
pubmed: 1676611
Ohta JI, Miyoshi Y, Uemura H, Fujinami K, Mikata K, Hosaka M, Tokita Y, Kubota Y. Fluorescence in situ hybridization evaluation of c-erbB-2 gene amplification and chromosomal anomalies in bladder cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2001;7:2463–7.
pubmed: 11489827
Zhou Z, Zhang Z, Chen H, Bao W, Kuang X, Zhou P, Gao Z, Li D, Xie X, Yang C, et al. SBSN drives bladder cancer metastasis via EGFR/SRC/STAT3 signalling. Br J Cancer. 2022;127:211–22.
pubmed: 35484216
pmcid: 9296541
Ying X, Liu B, Yuan Z, Huang Y, Chen C, Jiang X, Zhang H, Qi D, Yang S, Lin S, et al. METTL1-m(7) G-EGFR/EFEMP1 axis promotes the bladder cancer development. Clin Transl Med. 2021;11: e675.
pubmed: 34936728
pmcid: 8694502
Panani AD, Babanaraki A, Malianga E, Roussos C. Numerical aberrations of chromosomes 9 and 11 detected by FISH in Greek bladder cancer patients. Anticancer Res. 2004;24:3857–61.
pubmed: 15736422
Berggren P, Kumar R, Sakano S, Hemminki L, Wada T, Steineck G, Adolfsson J, Larsson P, Norming U, Wijkström H, Hemminki K. Detecting homozygous deletions in the CDKN2A(p16(INK4a))/ARF(p14(ARF)) gene in urinary bladder cancer using real-time quantitative PCR. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:235–42.
pubmed: 12538475
Seideman C, Canter D, Kim P, Cordon B, Weizer A, Oliva I, Rao J, Inman BA, Posch M, Herr H, Lotan Y. Multicenter evaluation of the role of UroVysion FISH assay in surveillance of patients with bladder cancer: does FISH positivity anticipate recurrence? World J Urol. 2015;33:1309–13.
pubmed: 25420920
Bergman J, Reznichek RC, Rajfer J. Surveillance of patients with bladder carcinoma using fluorescent in-situ hybridization on bladder washings. BJU Int. 2008;101:26–9.
pubmed: 17850364
Liem E, Baard J, Cauberg ECC, Bus MTJ, de Bruin DM, Laguna Pes MP, de la Rosette J, de Reijke TM. Fluorescence in situ hybridization as prognostic predictor of tumor recurrence during treatment with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy for intermediate- and high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Med Oncol. 2017;34:172.
pubmed: 28866819
pmcid: 5581817
Jung I, Reeder JE, Cox C, Siddiqui JF, O’Connell MJ, Collins L, Yang Z, Messing EM, Wheeless LL. Chromosome 9 monosomy by fluorescence in situ hybridization of bladder irrigation specimens is predictive of tumor recurrence. J Urol. 1999;162:1900–3.
pubmed: 10569533
Cai T, Nesi G, Dal Canto M, Tinacci G, Mondaini N, Piazzini M, Geppetti P, Bartoletti R. Loss of heterozygosis on IFN-alpha locus is a prognostic indicator of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin response for nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. J Urol. 2010;183:1738–43.
pubmed: 20299058
Lu X, Meng J, Su L, Jiang L, Wang H, Zhu J, Huang M, Cheng W, Xu L, Ruan X, et al. Multi-omics consensus ensemble refines the classification of muscle-invasive bladder cancer with stratified prognosis, tumour microenvironment and distinct sensitivity to frontline therapies. Clin Transl Med. 2021;11: e601.
pubmed: 34936229
pmcid: 8693439
Bu F, Li X, Zhao Y, Bai L, Zhang S, Min L. Pan-cancer patterns of cuproptosis markers reveal biologically and clinically relevant cancer subtypes. Biomark Res. 2023;11:13.
pubmed: 36721175
pmcid: 9887831
Nie W, Tao G, Lu Z, Qian J, Ge Y, Wang S, Zhang X, Zhong H, Yu H. Prognostic and predictive value of radiomic signature in stage I lung adenocarcinomas following complete lobectomy. J Transl Med. 2022;20:339.
pubmed: 35902907
pmcid: 9331779
Pan J, Hong G, Zeng H, Liao C, Li H, Yao Y, Gan Q, Wang Y, Wu S, Lin T. An artificial intelligence model for the pathological diagnosis of invasion depth and histologic grade in bladder cancer. J Transl Med. 2023;21:42.
pubmed: 36691055
pmcid: 9869632
Chen K, Wang Q, Liu X, Tian X, Dong A, Yang Y. Immune profiling and prognostic model of pancreatic cancer using quantitative pathology and single-cell RNA sequencing. J Transl Med. 2023;21:210.
pubmed: 36944944
pmcid: 10031915