A flow cytometry method for safe detection of bacterial viability.

bacteria flow cytometry - viability dye health and safety prevention

Journal

Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology
ISSN: 1552-4930
Titre abrégé: Cytometry A
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101235694

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Oct 2023
Historique:
revised: 18 08 2023
received: 19 06 2023
accepted: 04 09 2023
medline: 3 10 2023
pubmed: 3 10 2023
entrez: 3 10 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Flow cytometry is a relevant tool to meet the requirements of academic and industrial research projects aimed at estimating the features of a bacterial population (e.g., quantity, viability, activity). One of the remaining challenges is now the safe assessment of bacterial viability while minimizing the risks inherent to existing protocols. In our core facility at the Paris-Saclay University, we have addressed this issue with two objectives: measuring bacterial viability in biological samples and preventing bacterial contamination and chemical exposure of the staff and cytometers used on the platform. Here, we report the development of a protocol achieving these two objectives, including a viability labeling step before bacteria fixation, which removes the risk of biological exposure, and the decrease of the use of reagents such as propidium iodide (PI), which are dangerous for health (CMR: carcinogenic, mutagenic, and reprotoxic). For this purpose, we looked for a non-CMR viability dye that can irreversibly label dead bacteria before fixation procedures and maintain intense fluorescence after further staining. We decided to test on the bacteria, eFluor Fixable Viability dyes, which are usually used on eukaryotic cells. Since the bacteria had size and granularity characteristics very similar to those associated with flow cytometry background signals, a step of bacterial DNA labeling with SYTO or DRAQ5 was necessarily added to differentiate them from the background. Three marker combinations (viability-DNA) were tested on LSR Fortessa and validated on pure bacterial populations (Gram

Identifiants

pubmed: 37786349
doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.24794
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Références

Zimmermann J, Hübschmann T, Schattenberg F, Schumann J, Durek P, Riedel R, et al. High-resolution microbiota flow cytometry reveals dynamic colitis-associated changes in fecal bacterial composition. Eur J Immunol. 2016;46:1300-1303.
Mayol J-F, Laplace-Builhé C, Muller CD. Les principes de la cytometrie en flux. Lavoisier: Lavoisier Tec et Doc; 2020. p. 1-35 Available from: https://www.lavoisier.fr/livre/sciences-de-la-vie/la-cytometrie-en-flux/mayol/descriptif-9782743024901
Mayol J-F, Laplace-Builhé C, Muller CD. La microbiologie. Lavoisier: Lavoisier Tec et Doc; 2020. p. 309-324 Available from: https://www.lavoisier.fr/livre/sciences-de-la-vie/la-cytometrie-en-flux/mayol/descriptif-9782743024901
Shapiro HM, Nebe-von-Caron G, Hawley TS, Hawley RG. Multiparameter flow cytometry of bacteria. Vol 263. 2nd ed. Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey, US; 2004. p. 33-43 Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14976359/
Álvarez-Barrientos A, Arroyo J, Cantón R, Nombela C, Sánchez-Pérez M. Applications of flow cytometry to clinical microbiology. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000;13:167-195.
Tavenier AH, de Boer FJ, Moshaver B, van der Leur SJCM, Stegeman CA, Groeneveld PHP. Flow cytometric analysis of viable bacteria in urine samples of febrile patients at the emergency department: flow cytometric analysis of viable bacteria in urine samples. Cytom B Clin Cytom. 2018;94:845-851.
Alsharif R, Godfrey W. Bacterial detection and live/dead discrimination by cytometry, Application Note. 2002 Available from: https://cdn.technologynetworks.com/TN/Resources/PDF/Bacterial_Detection_Live_Dead.pdf
Mayol J-F, Laplace-Builhé C, Muller CD. La biosécurité et la cytométrie en flux. Lavoisier: Lavoisier Tec et Doc; 2020. p. 483-497 Available from: https://www.lavoisier.fr/livre/sciences-de-la-vie/la-cytometrie-en-flux/mayol/descriptif-9782743024901
Fouchet P, Jayat C, Héchard Y, Ratinaud M-H, Frelat G. Recent advances of flow cytometry in fundamental and applied microbiology. Biol Cell. 1993;78:95-109.
Bartle L, Mitchell JG, Paterson JS. Evaluating the Cytometric detection and enumeration of the wine bacterium Oenococcus oeni. Cytom A. 2021;99:399-406.
Smith PJ, Wiltshire M, Errington RJ. DRAQ 5 labeling of nuclear DNA in live and fixed cells. Curr Protoc Cytom. 2004;28:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142956.cy0725s28
Berga-Bolaños R, Sharma A, Steinke FC, Pyaram K, Kim Y-H, Sultana DA, et al. β-Catenin is required for the differentiation of iNKT2 and iNKT17 cells that augment IL-25-dependent lung inflammation. BMC Immunol. 2015;16:62.
Dan JM, Lindestam Arlehamn CS, Weiskopf D, da Silva AR, Havenar-Daughton C, Reiss SM, et al. A cytokine-independent approach to identify antigen-specific human germinal center T follicular helper cells and rare antigen-specific CD4+ T cells in blood. J Immunol. 2016;197:983-993.
Nebe-von-Caron G, Stephens PJ, Hewitt CJ, Powell JR, Badley RA. Analysis of bacterial function by multi-colour fluorescence flow cytometry and single cell sorting. J Microbiol Methods. 2000;42:97-114.
Coconnier MH, Bernet MF, Chauvière G, Servin AL. Adhering heat-killed human Lactobacillus acidophilus, strain LB, inhibits the process of pathogenicity of diarrhoeagenic bacteria in cultured human intestinal cells. J Diarrhoeal Dis Res. 1993;11:235-242.
Cossarizza A, Chang H-D, Radbruch A, Abrignani S, Addo R, Akdis M, et al. Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies (second edition), chap 7 Microbials cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 2019;49:1457-1973.
Molecular Probe product information. Live/dead bac light bacterial viability and counting, product information. 2004 Available from: https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/L34856
Ou F, McGoverin C, Swift S, Vanholsbeeck F. Absolute bacterial cell enumeration using flow cytometry. J Appl Microbiol. 2017;123:464-477.
Perfetto SP, Chattopadhyay PK, Lamoreaux L, Nguyen R, Ambrozak D, Koup RA, et al. Amine reactive dyes: an effective tool to discriminate live and dead cells in polychromatic flow cytometry. J Immunol Methods. 2006;313:199-208.
Stiefel P, Schmidt-Emrich S, Maniura-Weber K, Ren Q. Critical aspects of using bacterial cell viability assays with the fluorophores SYTO9 and propidium iodide. BMC Microbiol. 2015;15:36.
McGoverin C, Robertson J, Jonmohamadi Y, Swift S, Vanholsbeeck F. Species dependence of SYTO 9 staining of bacteria. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:545419.
Wang M, Ateia M, Hatano Y, Miyanaga K, Yoshimura C. Novel fluorescence-based method for rapid quantification of live bacteria in river water and treated wastewater. Environ Sci Adv. 2022;1:30-36.
Fontana C, Crussard S, Simon-Dufay N, Pialot D, Bomchil N, Reyes J. Use of flow cytometry for rapid and accurate enumeration of live pathogenic Leptospira strains. J Microbiol Methods. 2017;132:34-40.
Boulos L, Prévost M, Barbeau B, Coallier J, Desjardins R. LIVE/DEAD® BacLight™: application of a new rapid staining method for direct enumeration of viable and total bacteria in drinking water. J Microbiol Methods. 1999;37:77-86.
Raymond Y, Champagne CP. The use of flow cytometry to accurately ascertain total and viable counts of Lactobacillus rhamnosus in chocolate. Food Microbiol. 2015;46:176-183.
Bouix M, Ghorbal S, Picque D, Perret B, Saulou-Bérion C. A rapid method for the assessment of the vitality of microorganisms using flow cytometry. Cytom A. 2022;101:577-587.
Barer MR, Harwood CR. Bacterial viability and culturability. Adv Microb Physiol. 1999;41:93-137.
Want A, Hancocks H, Thomas CR, Stocks SM, Nebe-von-Caron G, Hewitt CJ. Multi-parameter flow cytometry and cell sorting reveal extensive physiological heterogeneity in Bacillus cereus batch cultures. Biotechnol Lett. 2011;33:1395-1405.
Gratama JW, Kraan J, Keeney M, Sutherland DR, Granger V, Barnett D. Validation of the single-platform ISHAGE method for CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell enumeration in an international multicenter study. Cytotherapy. 2003;5:55-65.
Van Der Meer PF, Gratama JW, Van Delden CJ, Laport RF, Levering WHBM, Schrijver JG, et al. Comparison of five platforms for enumeration of residual leucocytes in leucoreduced blood components: comparison of methods for low level leucocyte counting. Br J Haematol. 2001;115:953-962.

Auteurs

S Servain-Viel (S)

Plateforme CYM - UMS-IPSIT, Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, CNRS, Ingénierie et Plateformes au Service de l'Innovation Thérapeutique, Orsay, France.

M-L Aknin (ML)

Plateforme CYM - UMS-IPSIT, Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, CNRS, Ingénierie et Plateformes au Service de l'Innovation Thérapeutique, Orsay, France.

S Domenichini (S)

Plateforme MIPSIT - UMS-IPSIT, Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, CNRS, Ingénierie et Plateformes au Service de l'Innovation Thérapeutique, Orsay, France.

G Perlemuter (G)

Inflammation, Microbiome and Immunosurveillance, UMR-996, Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, Orsay, France.
Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie Et Nutrition, Hôpital Antoine-Béclère, AP- HP Université Paris-Saclay, Clamart, France.

A-M Cassard (AM)

Inflammation, Microbiome and Immunosurveillance, UMR-996, Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, Orsay, France.

G Schlecht-Louf (G)

Inflammation, Microbiome and Immunosurveillance, UMR-996, Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, Orsay, France.

V Lievin-Le Moal (VL)

Inflammation, Microbiome and Immunosurveillance, UMR-996, Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, Orsay, France.

Classifications MeSH