Do measures of physical capacity and walking self-efficacy relate to frailty in older adults with difficulty walking outdoors? A secondary data analysis.

Frailty older adults physical capacity standardized assessment tools walking self-efficacy

Journal

Disability and rehabilitation
ISSN: 1464-5165
Titre abrégé: Disabil Rehabil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9207179

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Oct 2023
Historique:
medline: 3 10 2023
pubmed: 3 10 2023
entrez: 3 10 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Measures of physical capacity and self-efficacy may help rehabilitation professionals better understand and detect frailty in older adults. We aimed to characterize frailty, walking self-efficacy, physical capacity, and their inter-relationships in older adults with difficulty walking outdoors. A secondary analysis of baseline data from 187 older adults (age ≥ 65 years) with mobility limitations was performed. Frailty was evaluated using the cardiovascular health study frailty index. Physical capacity was measured using the 10-meter walk test (10mWT), 6-min walk test (6MWT), 30-second sit-to-stand test (30STST), mini balance evaluation systems test (mini-BESTest), and hand dynamometry. Self-efficacy was assessed using the ambulatory self-confidence questionnaire (ASCQ). We evaluated associations between scores on physical capacity and walking self-efficacy measures and frailty level using an ANOVA or the Kruskal Wallis H-test. The percentage of participants not frail, pre-frail, and frail was 33.7%, 57.2%, and 9.1%, respectively. Median score on the 10mWT-comfortable pace, 10mWT-fast pace, 6MWT, 30STST, mini-BESTest, grip strength, and ASCQ was 1.06 m/s, 1.42 m/s, 354.0 m, 9.0 repetitions, 22 points, 23.0 kg, and 8.1 points, respectively. Scores on physical capacity and walking self-efficacy measures were associated with frailty level ( Findings provide insight into the utility of rehabilitation measures to indicate frailty among older adults with mobility limitations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37787058
doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2258336
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-8

Auteurs

Andrew Veley (A)

Department of Physical Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Maja Degen (M)

Department of Physical Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Lauren Rimmer (L)

Department of Physical Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Lauren Collins (L)

Department of Physical Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Izabela Dorocicz (I)

Department of Physical Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Jennifer Smith (J)

Department of Physical Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Ruth Barclay (R)

Department of Physical Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

Stephanie Scodras (S)

Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Kyla Alsbury-Nealy (K)

Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Nancy M Salbach (NM)

Department of Physical Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
The KITE Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Classifications MeSH