Invasive macroalgae in native seagrass beds - vectors of spread and impacts.
Sargassum muticum
Zostera marina
Biochemistry
allelopathy
ecosystem engineer
invasion
limpet
seagrass
vector
Journal
Annals of botany
ISSN: 1095-8290
Titre abrégé: Ann Bot
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372347
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Oct 2023
03 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
12
04
2023
medline:
3
10
2023
pubmed:
3
10
2023
entrez:
3
10
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Worldwide, invasive species are spreading through marine systems at an unprecedented rate with both positive and negative consequences for ecosystems and biological functioning of organisms. Human activities from shipping to habitat damage and modification are known vectors of spread, although biological interactions including epibiosis are increasingly recognised as potentially important to introduction into susceptible habitats. We assessed a novel spread mechanism - limpets as transporters of invasive algae, Sargassum muticum into beds of the seagrass Zostera marina - and the physiological impact of its invasion. The association of S. muticum with three limpet species and other habitats was assessed using intertidal surveys on rocky shores and snorkelling at two seagrass sites in the UK. A 4-yr field study tested the effect of S. muticum on Z. marina shoot density, dry weight and phenolic compounds (caffeic and tannic acid) content, and a laboratory experiment tested the impact of S. muticum on nutrient partitioning (C/H/N/P/Si), photosynthetic efficiency (Fv/Fm) and growth of Z. marina. On rocky shores 15% of S. muticum occurrences were attached to the shells of live limpets. In seagrass beds 5% of S. muticum occurrences were attached to the shells of dead limpets. The remainder were attached to rock, cobblestones, the seagrass matrix or embedded within the sand. Z. marina density and phenolics content was lower when S. muticum co-occurred with it. Over 3-years, photosynthetic response of Z. marina to S. muticum was idiosyncratic, and S. muticum had no effect on nutrient partitioning in Z. marina. Our results show limpets support S. muticum as an epibiont and may act as a previous unreported transport mechanism introducing invaders into sensitive habitats. S. muticum reduced phenolics production in Z. marina which may weaken its defensive capabilities and facilitate proliferation of S. muticum. The effect of S. muticum on Z. marina photosynthesis requires further work but having no effect on the capacity of Z. marina to sequester nutrients suggests a degree of resilience to this invader.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
OBJECTIVE
Worldwide, invasive species are spreading through marine systems at an unprecedented rate with both positive and negative consequences for ecosystems and biological functioning of organisms. Human activities from shipping to habitat damage and modification are known vectors of spread, although biological interactions including epibiosis are increasingly recognised as potentially important to introduction into susceptible habitats.
METHODS
METHODS
We assessed a novel spread mechanism - limpets as transporters of invasive algae, Sargassum muticum into beds of the seagrass Zostera marina - and the physiological impact of its invasion. The association of S. muticum with three limpet species and other habitats was assessed using intertidal surveys on rocky shores and snorkelling at two seagrass sites in the UK. A 4-yr field study tested the effect of S. muticum on Z. marina shoot density, dry weight and phenolic compounds (caffeic and tannic acid) content, and a laboratory experiment tested the impact of S. muticum on nutrient partitioning (C/H/N/P/Si), photosynthetic efficiency (Fv/Fm) and growth of Z. marina.
RESULTS
RESULTS
On rocky shores 15% of S. muticum occurrences were attached to the shells of live limpets. In seagrass beds 5% of S. muticum occurrences were attached to the shells of dead limpets. The remainder were attached to rock, cobblestones, the seagrass matrix or embedded within the sand. Z. marina density and phenolics content was lower when S. muticum co-occurred with it. Over 3-years, photosynthetic response of Z. marina to S. muticum was idiosyncratic, and S. muticum had no effect on nutrient partitioning in Z. marina.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our results show limpets support S. muticum as an epibiont and may act as a previous unreported transport mechanism introducing invaders into sensitive habitats. S. muticum reduced phenolics production in Z. marina which may weaken its defensive capabilities and facilitate proliferation of S. muticum. The effect of S. muticum on Z. marina photosynthesis requires further work but having no effect on the capacity of Z. marina to sequester nutrients suggests a degree of resilience to this invader.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37787519
pii: 7288096
doi: 10.1093/aob/mcad143
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.