Precision of the ultrasonography-integrated tibial extramedullary guide for total knee arthroplasty.
Computer-assisted surgeries
Extramedullary guide
Total knee arthroplasty
Ultrasonography
Journal
European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie
ISSN: 1432-1068
Titre abrégé: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9518037
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Oct 2023
03 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
14
08
2023
accepted:
18
09
2023
medline:
3
10
2023
pubmed:
3
10
2023
entrez:
3
10
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Precise determination of the tibial mechanical axis in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) requires intraoperative identification of the talus center. We present the ultrasonography-integrated tibial extramedullary guide (USG) that enables real-time visualization of the talus. This study assesses the precision of USG compared to computer-assisted surgery (CAS) and validates the efficacy of USG. We evaluated 58 patients (62 knees) who underwent primary TKA retrospectively, categorizing them into USG and CAS groups (31 each). We statistically analyzed demographic data, the preoperative alignment of the tibial plateau to the mechanical axis, the postoperative alignment of the tibial component to planned alignment on 3D-CT, pain visual analog scale, and WOMAC scores. Additionally, the frequency of postoperative outlier from planned alignment over 2° was statistically compared. No significant differences were observed in the preoperative data between the groups. The accuracy (mean deviation from the planned alignment) in both groups was not statistically different. However, in terms of the precision of coronal alignment, the USG group exhibited lower variance than the CAS group in the F-test (F value = 2.76, p = 0.023). Moreover, there were no postoperative deviations beyond 2 degrees in the USG group, in contrast to a 20% outlier frequency in the CAS group (p = 0.024). Concerning the precision of sagittal alignment (variance and deviations over 2°), no statistical differences were identified. The USG demonstrated higher precision in the tibial coronal plane than CAS in coronal alignment. Direct identification of the individual talus may enhance precision.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37787971
doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03741-5
pii: 10.1007/s00590-023-03741-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Ueyama H, Minoda Y, Sugama R, Ohta Y, Yamamura K, Nakamura S, Takemura S, Nakamura H (2019) An accelerometer-based portable navigation system improved prosthetic alignment after total knee arthroplasty in 3D measurements. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:1580–1586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5082-4
doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5082-4
pubmed: 30066018
Akagi M, Oh M, Nonaka T, Tsujimoto H, Asano T, Hamanishi C (2004) An anteroposterior axis of the tibia for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200403000-00030
doi: 10.1097/00003086-200403000-00030
pubmed: 15057100
Fu Y, Wang M, Liu Y, Fu Q (2012) Alignment outcomes in navigated total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1075–1082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1695-6
doi: 10.1007/s00167-011-1695-6
pubmed: 22002300
Dai Y, Bolch C, Jung A, Hamad C, Angibaud L, Stulberg BN, Huddleston JI 3rd (2020) Accuracy and precision in resection alignment: Insights from 10,144 clinical cases using a contemporary computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty system. Knee. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2020.02.024
doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.02.024
pubmed: 32223972
Onggo JR, Onggo JD, De Steiger R, Hau R (2020) Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is comparable to conventional total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03512-5
doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03512-5
pubmed: 32537660
Lee DY, Park YJ, Hwang SC, Park JS, Kang DG (2019) No differences in mid- to long-term outcomes of computer-assisted navigation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05808-5
doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05808-5
pubmed: 31840191
Mizu-uchi H, Matsuda S, Miura H, Higaki H, Okazaki K, Iwamoto Y (2006) The effect of ankle rotation on cutting of the tibia in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:2632–2636. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.e.01288
doi: 10.2106/jbjs.e.01288
pubmed: 17142413
Sugimura N, Ikeuchi M, Izumi M, Aso K, Ushida T, Tani T (2013) The dorsal pedis artery as a new distal landmark for extramedullary tibial alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2461-8
doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2461-8
pubmed: 23455389
Aso K, Ikeuchi M, Takaya S, Sugimura N, Izumi M, Wada H, Okanoue Y, Dan J (2021) Chronic postsurgical pain after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study in Japanese population. Mod Rheumatol 31:1038–1044. https://doi.org/10.1080/14397595.2020.1859709
doi: 10.1080/14397595.2020.1859709
pubmed: 33274662
Park JK, Seon JK, Cho KJ, Lee NH, Song EK (2018) Is immediate postoperative mechanical axis associated with the revision rate of primary total knee arthroplasty? A 10-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Surg 10:167–173. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2018.10.2.167
doi: 10.4055/cios.2018.10.2.167
pubmed: 29854339
pmcid: 5964264
Trieu J, Schilling C, Dowsey MM, Choong PF (2021) The cost-effectiveness of computer navigation in primary total knee replacement: a scoping review. EFORT Open Rev 6:173–180. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.6.200073
doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200073
pubmed: 33841916
pmcid: 8025703
Smith TJ, Siddiqi A, Forte SA, Judice A, Sculco PK, Vigdorchik JM, Schwarzkopf R, Springer BD (2021) Periprosthetic fractures through tracking pin sites following computer navigated and robotic total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. JBJS Rev 9(e20):00091. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.rvw.20.00091
doi: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.20.00091
Blankstein A (2011) Ultrasound in the diagnosis of clinical orthopedics: the orthopedic stethoscope. World J Orthop 2:13–24. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v2.i2.13
doi: 10.5312/wjo.v2.i2.13
pubmed: 22474631
pmcid: 3302037
Daniels EW, Cole D, Jacobs B, Phillips SF (2018) Existing evidence on ultrasound-guided injections in sports medicine. Orthop J Sports Med 6:2325967118756576. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118756576
doi: 10.1177/2325967118756576
pubmed: 29511701
pmcid: 5826008