Validation of the Randox colorimetric assays for serum copper and zinc.

Copper colorimetry zinc

Journal

Annals of clinical biochemistry
ISSN: 1758-1001
Titre abrégé: Ann Clin Biochem
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0324055

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Oct 2023
Historique:
pubmed: 4 10 2023
medline: 4 10 2023
entrez: 3 10 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Serum copper and zinc are measured to assess deficiency and toxicity. Atomic absorption spectrophotometry and mass spectrometry methods are expensive and require highly trained staff. Colorimetric assays are available from Randox which are inexpensive and can be automated. We validated serum copper and zinc colorimetric assays on the Binding Site Optilite analyser including comparison with flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry (FAAS) and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Accuracy, imprecision, lower limit of quantitation, and linearity were ascertained. The impact of triglycerides, bilirubin, nickel, and iron on assay performance was also investigated. Comparison of results from colorimetric analysis of patient and external quality assurance samples with those obtained by FAAS and ICP-MS was undertaken. Intra-, and inter-assay imprecision was <9%. Serum copper and zinc assays were linear between 1.8-35.6 and 2.3-45.7 µmol/L, respectively. Agreement was good between colorimetry and FAAS (intercept = -0.7, slope = 1.04) and ICP-MS (intercept = 0.6, slope = 0.99) for serum copper in patients' samples. For serum zinc, agreement was poor between colorimetry and FAAS (intercept = 2.2, slope = 0.87) and ICP-MS (intercept = 1.9, slope = 0.98) in patients' samples. There was a poor concordance in assessment of hypozincaemia between colorimetry and FAAS/ICP-MS. The Randox colorimetric assay for serum copper on the Optilite is simple to perform, has a short analysis time, and measured concentrations compare well with FAAS and ICP-MS. Due to poor agreement with FAAS and ICP-MS, colorimetry is not suitable for the measurement of serum zinc.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Serum copper and zinc are measured to assess deficiency and toxicity. Atomic absorption spectrophotometry and mass spectrometry methods are expensive and require highly trained staff. Colorimetric assays are available from Randox which are inexpensive and can be automated. We validated serum copper and zinc colorimetric assays on the Binding Site Optilite analyser including comparison with flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry (FAAS) and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS).
METHODS METHODS
Accuracy, imprecision, lower limit of quantitation, and linearity were ascertained. The impact of triglycerides, bilirubin, nickel, and iron on assay performance was also investigated. Comparison of results from colorimetric analysis of patient and external quality assurance samples with those obtained by FAAS and ICP-MS was undertaken.
RESULTS RESULTS
Intra-, and inter-assay imprecision was <9%. Serum copper and zinc assays were linear between 1.8-35.6 and 2.3-45.7 µmol/L, respectively. Agreement was good between colorimetry and FAAS (intercept = -0.7, slope = 1.04) and ICP-MS (intercept = 0.6, slope = 0.99) for serum copper in patients' samples. For serum zinc, agreement was poor between colorimetry and FAAS (intercept = 2.2, slope = 0.87) and ICP-MS (intercept = 1.9, slope = 0.98) in patients' samples. There was a poor concordance in assessment of hypozincaemia between colorimetry and FAAS/ICP-MS.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The Randox colorimetric assay for serum copper on the Optilite is simple to perform, has a short analysis time, and measured concentrations compare well with FAAS and ICP-MS. Due to poor agreement with FAAS and ICP-MS, colorimetry is not suitable for the measurement of serum zinc.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37789002
doi: 10.1177/00045632231208337
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

45632231208337

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Simon A Handley (SA)

Biochemistry, Department of Pathology, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Menzies Institute for Medical Research, Hobart, TAS, Australia.

Troy Wanandy (T)

School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Menzies Institute for Medical Research, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, TAS, Australia.

Louise Prentice (L)

Biochemistry, Department of Pathology, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Menzies Institute for Medical Research, Hobart, TAS, Australia.

Classifications MeSH