Burkholderia pseudomallei biofilm resists Acanthamoeba sp. grazing and produces 8-O-4'-diferulic acid, a superoxide scavenging metabolite after passage through the amoeba.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 10 2023
03 10 2023
Historique:
received:
22
06
2023
accepted:
28
09
2023
medline:
5
10
2023
pubmed:
4
10
2023
entrez:
3
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Burkholderia pseudomallei, an etiological agent of melioidosis is an environmental bacterium that can survive as an intracellular pathogen. The biofilm produced by B. pseudomallei is crucial for cellular pathogenesis of melioidosis. The purpose of this investigation is to explore the role of biofilm in survival of B. pseudomallei during encounters with Acanthamoeba sp. using B. pseudomallei H777 (a biofilm wild type), M10 (a biofilm defect mutant) and C17 (a biofilm-complemented strain). The results demonstrated similar adhesion to amoebae by both the biofilm wild type and biofilm mutant strains. There was higher initial internalisation, but the difference diminished after longer encounter with the amoeba. Interestingly, confocal laser scanning microscopy demonstrated that pre-formed biofilm of B. pseudomallei H777 and C17 were markedly more persistent in the face of Acanthamoeba sp. grazing than that of M10. Metabolomic analysis revealed a significant increased level of 8-O-4'-diferulic acid, a superoxide scavenger metabolite, in B. pseudomallei H777 serially passaged in Acanthamoeba sp. The interaction between B. pseudomallei with a free-living amoeba may indicate the evolutionary pathway that enables the bacterium to withstand superoxide radicals in intracellular environments. This study supports the hypothesis that B. pseudomallei biofilm persists under grazing by amoebae and suggests a strategy of metabolite production that turns this bacterium from saprophyte to intracellular pathogen.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37789212
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43824-1
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-43824-1
pmc: PMC10547685
doi:
Substances chimiques
diferulic acid
0
Superoxides
11062-77-4
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
16578Informations de copyright
© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Inglis, T. J. & Sagripanti, J. L. Environmental factors that affect the survival and persistence of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 6865–6875. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01036-06 (2006).
doi: 10.1128/AEM.01036-06
pubmed: 16980433
pmcid: 1636198
Kamjumphol, W., Chareonsudjai, P., Taweechaisupapong, S. & Chareonsudjai, S. Morphological Alteration and Survival of Burkholderia pseudomallei in Soil Microcosms. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 93, 1058–1065. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.15-0177 (2015).
doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0177
pubmed: 26324731
pmcid: 4703280
Kamjumphol, W., Chareonsudjai, S., Chareonsudjai, P., Wongratanacheewin, S. & Taweechaisupapong, S. Environmental factors affecting Burkholderia pseudomallei biofilm formation. Southeast Asian. J. Trop. Med. Public Health 44, 72–81 (2013).
Suebrasri, T., Wang-ngarm, S., Chareonsudjai, P., Sermswan, R. W. & Chareonsudjai, S. Seasonal variation of soil environmental characteristics affect the presence of Burkholderia pseudomallei in Khon Kaen, Thailand. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 7, 1940–1945 (2013).
doi: 10.5897/AJMR2012.2335
Wang-Ngarm, S., Chareonsudjai, S. & Chareonsudjai, P. Physicochemical factors affecting the growth of Burkholderia pseudomallei in soil microcosm. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 90, 480–485. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.13-0446 (2014).
doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0446
pubmed: 24445210
pmcid: 3945694
Wiersinga, W. J. et al. Melioidosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 4, 17107. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2017.107 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.107
pubmed: 29388572
pmcid: 6456913
Turner, P. et al. A retrospective analysis of melioidosis in Cambodian children, 2009–2013. BMC Infect. Dis. 16, 688. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-2034-9 (2016).
doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-2034-9
pubmed: 27871233
pmcid: 5117556
Allwood, E. M., Devenish, R. J., Prescott, M., Adler, B. & Boyce, J. D. Strategies for intracellular survival of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Front. Microbiol. 2, 170. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2011.00170 (2011).
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00170
pubmed: 22007185
pmcid: 3159172
Mariappan, V. et al. Hijacking of the Host’s Immune Surveillance Radars by Burkholderia pseudomallei. Front. Immunol. 12, 718719. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.718719 (2021).
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.718719
pubmed: 34456925
pmcid: 8384953
Limmathurotsakul, D. et al. Predicted global distribution of Burkholderia pseudomallei and burden of melioidosis. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 15008. https://doi.org/10.1038/Nmicrobiol.2015.8 (2016).
doi: 10.1038/Nmicrobiol.2015.8
pubmed: 27571754
pmcid: 4746747
Savelkoel, J., Dance, D. A. B., Currie, B. J., Limmathurotsakul, D. & Wiersinga, W. J. A call to action: Time to recognise melioidosis as a neglected tropical disease. Lancet Infect Dis 22, e176–e182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00394-7 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00394-7
pubmed: 34953519
Pumpuang, A. et al. Survival of Burkholderia pseudomallei in distilled water for 16 years. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 105, 598–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trstmh.2011.06.004 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2011.06.004
pubmed: 21764093
Kaestli, M. et al. Out of the ground: aerial and exotic habitats of the melioidosis bacterium Burkholderia pseudomallei in grasses in Australia. Environ. Microbiol. 14, 2058–2070. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02671.x (2012).
doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02671.x
pubmed: 22176696
Inglis, T. J. J. et al. Interaction between Burkholderia pseudomallei and Acanthamoeba species results in coiling phagocytosis, endamebic bacterial survival, and escape. Infect. Immun. 68, 1681–1686. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.68.3.1681-1686.2000 (2000).
doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.3.1681-1686.2000
pubmed: 10678988
pmcid: 97329
Hall-Stoodley, L., Costerton, J. W. & Stoodley, P. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2, 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro821 (2004).
doi: 10.1038/nrmicro821
pubmed: 15040259
Matz, C. et al. Biofilm formation and phenotypic variation enhance predation-driven persistence of Vibrio cholerae. 102, 16819-16824, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0505350102 (2005).
Matz, C., Bergfeld, T., Rice, S. A. & Kjelleberg, S. Microcolonies, quorum sensing and cytotoxicity determine the survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms exposed to protozoan grazing. Environ. Microbiol. 6, 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00556.x (2004).
doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00556.x
pubmed: 14871206
Kunyanee, C. et al. Burkholderia pseudomallei biofilm promotes adhesion, internalization and stimulates proinflammatory cytokines in human epithelial A549 cells. PLoS One 11, e0160741. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160741 (2016).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160741
pubmed: 27529172
pmcid: 4987058
Molmeret, M., Horn, M., Wagner, M., Santic, M. & Abu Kwaik, Y. Amoebae as training grounds for intracellular bacterial pathogens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.1.20-28.2005 (2005).
doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.1.20-28.2005
pubmed: 15640165
pmcid: 544274
Rayamajhee, B. et al. Acanthamoeba, an environmental phagocyte enhancing survival and transmission of human pathogens. Trends Parasitol. 38, 975–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2022.08.007 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2022.08.007
pubmed: 36109313
Di Meo, S., Reed, T. T., Venditti, P. & Victor, V. M. Role of ROS and RNS sources in physiological and pathological conditions. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2016 (2016).
Zhang, X. & Soldati, T. Detecting, visualizing and quantitating the generation of reactive oxygen species in an amoeba model system. J. Visualized Exp. 81, e50717 (2013).
Espinoza-Vergara, G., Hoque, M. M., McDougald, D. & Noorian, P. The impact of protozoan predation on the pathogenicity of Vibrio cholerae. Front. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00017 (2020).
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00017
pubmed: 32038597
pmcid: 6985070
Imlay, J. A. Cellular defenses against superoxide and hydrogen peroxide. J Annu. Rev. Biochem. 77, 755–776 (2008).
doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.061606.161055
Weitere, M., Bergfeld, T., Rice, S. A., Matz, C. & Kjelleberg, S. Grazing resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms depends on type of protective mechanism, developmental stage and protozoan feeding mode. Environ. Microbiol. 7, 1593–1601. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00851.x (2005).
doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00851.x
pubmed: 16156732
Matz, C. et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa uses type III secretion system to kill biofilm-associated amoebae. ISME J. 2, 843–852. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2008.47 (2008).
doi: 10.1038/ismej.2008.47
pubmed: 18480848
Noinarin, P., Chareonsudjai, P., Wangsomnuk, P., Wongratanacheewin, S. & Chareonsudjai, S. Environmental free-living amoebae isolated from soil in Khon Kaen, Thailand, antagonize Burkholderia pseudomallei. PLoS One 11, e0167355. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167355 (2016).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167355
pubmed: 27898739
pmcid: 5127566
Huws, S. A., McBain, A. J. & Gilbert, P. Protozoan grazing and its impact upon population dynamics in biofilm communities. J. Appl. Microbiol. 98, 238–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02449.x (2005).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02449.x
pubmed: 15610437
Martin, K. H., Borlee, G. I., Wheat, W. H., Jackson, M. & Borlee, B. R. Busting biofilms: Free-living amoebae disrupt preformed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Mycobacterium bovis biofilms. Microbiol. (Reading) 166, 695–706. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.000933 (2020).
doi: 10.1099/mic.0.000933
Siddiqui, R. & Khan, N. A. Biology and pathogenesis of Acanthamoeba. Parasit. Vectors 5, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-5-6 (2012).
doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-5-6
pubmed: 22229971
pmcid: 3284432
Mangalea, M. R., Borlee, G. I. & Borlee, B. R. The current status of extracellular polymeric substances produced by Burkholderia pseudomallei. Curr. Tropical Med. Rep. 4, 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40475-017-0118-2 (2017).
doi: 10.1007/s40475-017-0118-2
Shu, L., Zhang, B., Queller, D. C. & Strassmann, J. E. Burkholderia bacteria use chemotaxis to find social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum hosts. ISME J. 12, 1977–1993. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-018-0147-4 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0147-4
pubmed: 29795447
pmcid: 6052080
Greub, G. & Raoult, D. Microorganisms resistant to free-living amoebae. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 17, 413–433. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.17.2.413-433.2004 (2004).
doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.2.413-433.2004
pubmed: 15084508
pmcid: 387402
Sun, S., Noorian, P. & McDougald, D. Dual role of mechanisms involved in resistance to predation by protozoa and virulence to humans. Front. Microbiol. 9, 1017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01017 (2018).
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01017
pubmed: 29867902
pmcid: 5967200
Strassmann, J. E. & Shu, L. Ancient bacteria-amoeba relationships and pathogenic animal bacteria. PLoS Biol. 15, e2002460. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2002460 (2017).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2002460
pubmed: 28463965
pmcid: 5412987
Erken, M., Lutz, C. & McDougald, D. The rise of pathogens: Predation as a factor driving the evolution of human pathogens in the environment. Microb. Ecol. 65, 860–868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-013-0189-0 (2013).
doi: 10.1007/s00248-013-0189-0
pubmed: 23354181
pmcid: 3637895
Vanaporn, M. et al. Superoxide dismutase C is required for intracellular survival and virulence of Burkholderia pseudomallei. Microbiology 157, 2392–2400. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.050823-0 (2011).
doi: 10.1099/mic.0.050823-0
pubmed: 21659326
Adl, S. M. et al. The revised classification of eukaryotes. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 59, 429–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x (2012).
doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x
pubmed: 23020233
pmcid: 3483872
Garcia-Conesa, M. T., Plumb, G. W., Waldron, K. W., Ralph, J. & Williamson, G. Ferulic acid dehydrodimers from wheat bran: Isolation, purification and antioxidant properties of 8-O-4-diferulic acid. Redox Rep. 3, 319–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510002.1997.11747129 (1997).
doi: 10.1080/13510002.1997.11747129
pubmed: 9754331
Andreasen, M. F., Kroon, P. A., Williamson, G. & Garcia-Conesa, M.-T. Intestinal release and uptake of phenolic antioxidant diferulic acids. Free Radical Biol. Med. 31, 304–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(01)00585-8 (2001).
doi: 10.1016/S0891-5849(01)00585-8
Cano, A., Arnao, M. B., Williamson, G. & Garcia-Conesa, M. T. Superoxide scavenging by polyphenols: Effect of conjugation and dimerization. Redox Rep. 7, 379–383. https://doi.org/10.1179/135100002125001153 (2002).
doi: 10.1179/135100002125001153
pubmed: 12625945
Wang, H. et al. Catalases promote resistance of oxidative stress in Vibrio cholerae. PloS One 7, e53383 (2012).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053383
pubmed: 23300923
pmcid: 3534063
Noorian, P. et al. Pyomelanin produced by Vibrio cholerae confers resistance to predation by Acanthamoeba castellanii. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 93, 147. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fix147 (2017).
doi: 10.1093/femsec/fix147
Van der Henst, C., Scrignari, T., Maclachlan, C. & Blokesch, M. An intracellular replication niche for Vibrio cholerae in the amoeba Acanthamoeba castellanii. ISME J. 10, 897–910. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.165 (2016).
doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.165
pubmed: 26394005
Gjersing, E. L., Herberg, J. L., Horn, J., Schaldach, C. M. & Maxwell, R. S. NMR metabolomics of planktonic and biofilm modes of growth in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Anal. Chem. 79, 8037–8045. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac070800t (2007).
doi: 10.1021/ac070800t
pubmed: 17915964
Yeom, J., Shin, J. H., Yang, J. Y., Kim, J. & Hwang, G. S.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057730
pubmed: 23483923
pmcid: 3590295
Wong, E. H. J. et al. Metabolomic analysis of low and high biofilm-forming Helicobacter pylori strains. Sci. Rep. 8, 1409. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19697-0 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19697-0
pubmed: 29362474
pmcid: 5780479
Biggins, J. B., Liu, X., Feng, Z. & Brady, S. F. Metabolites from the induced expression of cryptic single operons found in the genome of Burkholderia pseudomallei. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 1638–1641. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja1087369 (2011).
doi: 10.1021/ja1087369
pubmed: 21247113
pmcid: 4872597
Taweechaisupapong, S. et al. Virulence of Burkholderia pseudomallei does not correlate with biofilm formation. Microb. Pathog. 39, 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2005.06.001 (2005).
doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2005.06.001
pubmed: 16084684
Page, F. A New Key to Freshwater and Soil Amoebae (Freshwater Biological Association, Scientific Publication, 1988).
Pakkulnan, R. et al. Extracellular DNA facilitates bacterial adhesion during Burkholderia pseudomallei biofilm formation. PLoS One 14, e0213288. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213288 (2019).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213288
pubmed: 30856240
pmcid: 6411153
Vorkas, P. A. et al. Untargeted UPLC-MS profiling pipeline to expand tissue metabolome coverage: Application to cardiovascular disease. Anal. Chem. 87, 4184–4193. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac503775m (2015).
doi: 10.1021/ac503775m
pubmed: 25664760
pmcid: 4407508
Phukhum, P. et al. The impact of hypoxia and oxidative stress on proteo-metabolomic alterations of 3D cholangiocarcinoma models. Sci. Rep. 13, 3072. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30204-y (2023).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30204-y
pubmed: 36810897
pmcid: 9944917