Analysis of Interview Breakoff in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2018 and 2019.

Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Interview breakoff nonresponse telephone survey total survey error

Journal

AJPM focus
ISSN: 2773-0654
Titre abrégé: AJPM Focus
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918487585606676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Historique:
medline: 4 10 2023
pubmed: 4 10 2023
entrez: 4 10 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Survey breakoff is an important source of total survey error. Most studies of breakoff have been of web surveys-less is known about telephone surveys. In the past decade, the breakoff rate has increased in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, the world's largest annual telephone survey. Analysis of breakoff in Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System can improve the quality of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. It will also provide evidence in research of total survey error on telephone surveys. We used data recorded as breakoff in the 2018 and 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. We converted questions and modules to a time variable and applied Kaplan-Meier method and a proportional hazard model to estimate the conditional and cumulative probabilities of breakoff and study the potential risk factors associated with breakoff. Cumulative probability of breakoffs up to the end of the core questionnaire was 7.03% in 2018 and 9.56% in 2019. The highest conditional probability of breakoffs in the core was 2.85% for the physical activity section. Cumulative probability of breakoffs up to the end of the core was higher among those states that inserted their own questions or optional modules than among those that did not in both years. The median risk ratio of breakoff among all states was 5.70 in 2018 and 3.01 in 2019. Survey breakoff was associated with the length of the questionnaire, the extent of expected recollection, and the location of questions. Breakoff is not an ignorable component of total survey error and should be considered in Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data analyses when variables have higher breakoff rates.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37790646
doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2023.100076
pii: S2773-0654(23)00013-5
pmc: PMC10546583
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

100076

Références

Eur J Epidemiol. 2001;17(11):991-9
pubmed: 12380710
Biomed Environ Sci. 2010 Dec;23(6):445-50
pubmed: 21315242
Surv Res Methods. 2013 Jan 1;7(2):79-90
pubmed: 24307916

Auteurs

Jason Hsia (J)

Division of Population Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

Madison Gilbert (M)

Peraton Corporation, Atlanta, Georgia.

Guixiang Zhao (G)

Division of Population Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

Machell Town (M)

Division of Population Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

Seidu Inusah (S)

Division of HIV Prevention, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

William Garvin (W)

Division of Population Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.

Classifications MeSH