The accurate identification of the percutaneous tracheostomy insertion site using digital palpation in children.
Çocuklarda dijital palpasyon kullanılarak perkütan trakeostomi yerleştirme bölgesinin tanımlanma doğruluğu.
Journal
Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES
ISSN: 1307-7945
Titre abrégé: Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101274231
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Oct 2023
Historique:
medline:
5
10
2023
pubmed:
4
10
2023
entrez:
4
10
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) may be required frequently in long-term ventilated intensive care patients. Although the overall risks are low, serious complications may occur, especially in children. Hence, this study aimed to assess physician accuracy in identifying PT insertion sites by digital palpation in children aged between 5 and 13 years. Participants were asked to identify the needle entry point (interspace between 2nd and 3rd or 3rd and 4th tracheal rings) for PT using digital palpation. Then, a single operator scanned the neck of each child with a linear high-frequency transducer. An accurate estimation was defined as a mark made between the upper and lower borders of the tracheal rings within the midline. In the study including 104 patients, the PT insertion site was accurately identified with digital palpation in a total of 50.9% of patients, compared with sonographic findings. The time required to determine the PT entry point by USG was longer than the palpation technique (114.7 vs. 43.8 s, P<0.001). The mean distance between the entry points of both methods was 4.53±2.03 mm. The majority of inaccurate assessments (45%) was above the 2nd tracheal ring. The lower the skin-to-air-mucosal interface distance, the higher the success of the PT entry point detection with the digital palpation method. A one-unit increase in body mass index was related to increasing the risk of failure by 1.1 times (P=0.030). Significant physician inaccuracy exists in PT insertion sites in children aged between 5 and 13 years, especially as BMI increases. Pre-procedural USG may help identify the landmarks for PT.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Percutaneous tracheostomy (PT) may be required frequently in long-term ventilated intensive care patients. Although the overall risks are low, serious complications may occur, especially in children. Hence, this study aimed to assess physician accuracy in identifying PT insertion sites by digital palpation in children aged between 5 and 13 years.
METHODS
METHODS
Participants were asked to identify the needle entry point (interspace between 2nd and 3rd or 3rd and 4th tracheal rings) for PT using digital palpation. Then, a single operator scanned the neck of each child with a linear high-frequency transducer. An accurate estimation was defined as a mark made between the upper and lower borders of the tracheal rings within the midline.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In the study including 104 patients, the PT insertion site was accurately identified with digital palpation in a total of 50.9% of patients, compared with sonographic findings. The time required to determine the PT entry point by USG was longer than the palpation technique (114.7 vs. 43.8 s, P<0.001). The mean distance between the entry points of both methods was 4.53±2.03 mm. The majority of inaccurate assessments (45%) was above the 2nd tracheal ring. The lower the skin-to-air-mucosal interface distance, the higher the success of the PT entry point detection with the digital palpation method. A one-unit increase in body mass index was related to increasing the risk of failure by 1.1 times (P=0.030).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Significant physician inaccuracy exists in PT insertion sites in children aged between 5 and 13 years, especially as BMI increases. Pre-procedural USG may help identify the landmarks for PT.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37791446
doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2023.59198
pmc: PMC10644085
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1075-1080Références
J Pediatr Surg. 1994 Nov;29(11):1421-4
pubmed: 7844712
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Jan;70(1):74-82
pubmed: 21820231
J Intensive Care Med. 2019 Mar;34(3):191-196
pubmed: 28446075
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998 May;56(5):681-5; discussion 685-6
pubmed: 9590354
Paediatr Anaesth. 2020 Jan;30(1):69-77
pubmed: 31746536
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Feb;212(2):163-70
pubmed: 21193331
J Anesth. 2018 Oct;32(5):768-773
pubmed: 30054717
Laryngoscope. 2007 Jan;117(1):176-8
pubmed: 17135981
J Crit Care. 2015 Feb;30(1):220.e13-7
pubmed: 25306240
Crit Care. 2014 Sep 18;18(5):514
pubmed: 25231604
J Intensive Care Soc. 2018 May;19(2):107-113
pubmed: 29796066
Anaesthesia. 2005 Jan;60(1):12-5
pubmed: 15601266
Paediatr Respir Rev. 2006 Sep;7(3):162-8
pubmed: 16938637
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011 Nov;55(10):1155-73
pubmed: 22092121
Ann Card Anaesth. 2017 Jan;20(Supplement):S19-S25
pubmed: 28074819
Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29-36
pubmed: 7063747
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Apr-Jun;38(2):281-287
pubmed: 36171929
Paediatr Anaesth. 2019 Jul;29(7):744-752
pubmed: 31063634
Chest. 1985 Jun;87(6):715-9
pubmed: 3996056
Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2012 Nov;15(4):143-148
pubmed: 28191160
Can J Surg. 2009 Oct;52(5):427-33
pubmed: 19865580