Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance to improve occupational performance goals for children with executive function deficits after acquired brain injury.


Journal

Developmental medicine and child neurology
ISSN: 1469-8749
Titre abrégé: Dev Med Child Neurol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0006761

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Oct 2023
Historique:
revised: 10 08 2023
received: 27 03 2023
accepted: 21 08 2023
pubmed: 4 10 2023
medline: 4 10 2023
entrez: 4 10 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To determine the effectiveness of the Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) approach in improving the occupational performance goals of children and young people with executive function deficits after acquired brain injury (ABI) (e.g. etiologies such as stroke, encephalitis, brain tumor, and traumatic brain injury). A replicated single-case experimental study using a randomized multiple baseline design across participants and goals was used. Three clusters of four participants (12 participants, nine males and three females, aged 8-16 years) were included. The intervention consisted of 14 individual CO-OP sessions. Each participant chose four goals; three goals were trained during the intervention sessions and a fourth goal served as the control. The Goal Attainment Scale (GAS) was used as a repeated measure to determine goal achievement while the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) was used to identify the perceived goal achievement of children, young people, and their parents. For 26 of the 35 trained goals, the intervention led to statistically significant improvements in the GAS. Perceived occupational performance and satisfaction improved significantly for the trained goals (30 out of 35 goals for the COPM performance and satisfaction of participants; 26 out 31 goals for the COPM performance of parents; 24 out of 31 goals for the COPM satisfaction of parents) and were maintained at the follow-up. Almost all COPM control goal results were significant, but these changes were not supported by the GAS measures or the statistical analysis. The generally positive results of this study provide evidence of the benefits of using the CO-OP approach with this population.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37792283
doi: 10.1111/dmcn.15759
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : French Ministry of Health
ID : PHRIP 2019_0074

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Mac Keith Press.

Références

Thurman DJ. The Epidemiology of Traumatic Brain Injury in Children and Young peoples: A Review of Research Since 1990. J Child Neurol. 2016;31(1):20-7.
Ward Platt MP, Little RA. Head injury in children. In: Injury in the young. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1998. p. 263-99.
Chevignard M, Catroppa C, Galvin J, Anderson V. Development and Evaluation of an Ecological Task to Assess Executive Functioning Post Childhood TBI: The Children's Cooking Task. Brain Impairment. 2010;11(2):125-43.
Krasny-Pacini A, Limond J, Evans J, Hiebel J, Bendjelida K, Chevignard M. Context-Sensitive Goal Management Training for Everyday Executive Dysfunction in Children After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 2014;29(5):E49-64.
Braga LW, da Paz Júnior AC, Ylvisaker M. Direct clinician-delivered versus indirect family-supported rehabilitation of children with traumatic brain injury: A randomized controlled trial. Brain Injury. 2005;19(10):819-31.
Camm S, Porter M, Brooks A, Boulton K, Veloso GC. Cognitive interventions for children with acquired brain injury: A systematic review. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 2021;31(4):621-66.
Laatsch L, Dodd J, Brown T, Ciccia A, Connor F, Davis K, et al. Evidence-based systematic review of cognitive rehabilitation, emotional, and family treatment studies for children with acquired brain injury literature: From 2006 to 2017. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 2020;30(1):130-61.
Ylvisaker M, Adelson PD, Braga LW, Burnett SM, Glang A, Feeney T, et al. Rehabilitation and Ongoing Support After Pediatric TBI: Twenty Years of Progress. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 2005;20(1):95-109.
Krasny-Pacini A, Limond J, Chevignard MP. Executive Function Interventions. In: Locascio G, Slomine BS, editors. Cognitive Rehabilitation for Pediatric Neurological Disorders [Internet]. 1st ed. Cambridge University Press; 2018 [cited 3 Apr 2020]. p. 75-99. Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9781316855683%23CN-bp-4/type/book_part
King G, Currie M, Petersen P. Child and parent engagement in the mental health intervention process: a motivational framework. Child and Adolescent Mental Health. 2014;19(1):2-8.
D'Arrigo R, Ziviani J, Poulsen AA, Copley J, King G. Measures of Parent Engagement for Children Receiving Developmental or Rehabilitation Interventions: A Systematic Review. Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics. 2018;38(1):18-38.
Dawson DR, McEwen SE, Polatajko HJ, editors. Cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance in occupational therapy: using the CO-OP Approach to enable participation across the lifespan. Bethesda, MD: AOTA Press, The American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc; 2017. 280 p.
Missiuna C, DeMatteo C, Hanna S, Mandich A, Law M, Mahoney W, et al. Exploring the Use of Cognitive Intervention for Children with Acquired Brain Injury. Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics. 2010;30(3):205-19.
Hunt AW, Paniccia M, Mah K, Dawson D, Reed N. Feasibility and Effects of the CO-OP ApproachTM in Postconcussion Rehabilitation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2019;73(1):7301205060p1.
Jackman M, Novak I, Lannin NA, Galea C, Froude E. The Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) Approach: Best responders in children with cerebral palsy and brain injury. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2018;78:103-13.
Jackman M, Novak I, Lannin N, Froude E, Miller L, Galea C. Effectiveness of Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance over and above functional hand splints for children with cerebral palsy or brain injury: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pediatr. 2018;18(1):248.
Dawson DR, Gaya A, Hunt A, Levine B, Lemsky C, Polatajko HJ. Using the Cognitive Orientation to Occupational Performance (CO-OP) with Adults with Executive Dysfunction following Traumatic Brain Injury. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2009;76(2):115-27.
Ng EMW, Polatajko HJ, Marziali E, Hunt A, Dawson DR. Telerehabilitation for addressing executive dysfunction after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury. 2013;27(5):548-64.
Krasny-Pacini A, Limond J, Chevignard M. Rehabilitation of executive functions - Children. In: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation - The International Handbook. 1st Edition. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2017. p. 213-9.
Lebrault H, Chavanne C, Abada G, Latinovic B, Varillon S, Bertrand AF, et al. Exploring the use of the Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance approach (CO-OP) with children with executive functions deficits after severe acquired brain injury: A single case experimental design study. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 2021;64(5):101535.
Tate RL, Perdices M, Rosenkoetter U, Wakim D, Godbee K, Togher L, et al. Revision of a method quality rating scale for single-case experimental designs and n -of-1 trials: The 15-item Risk of Bias in N -of-1 Trials (RoBiNT) Scale. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 2013;23(5):619-38.
Tate RL, Perdices M, Rosenkoetter U, Shadish W, Vohra S, Barlow DH, et al. The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 2017;27(1):1-15.
Levin JR, Ferron JM, Gafurov BS. Comparison of randomization-test procedures for single-case multiple-baseline designs. Developmental Neurorehabilitation. 2018;21(5):290-311.
Emslie H, Wilson C, Burden V, Nimmo-Smith I, Wilson B. Behavioral Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome for Children (BADS-C). Thames Valley Tests Company; 2003.
Giola GA, Isquith P, Guy SC, Kenworthy K. Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF). French adaptation: Roy A, Fournet N, Legall D, Roulin JL. Hogrefe; 2013.
Polatajko H, Mandich A. Enabling occupation in Children: The Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) Approach. CAOT Publications ACE. Ottawa: CAOT Publications ACE; 2004.
Beers SR, Wisniewski SR, Garcia-Filion P, Tian Y, Hahner T, Berger RP, et al. Validity of a Pediatric Version of the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2012;29(6):1126-39.
Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl MA, Polatajko H, Pollock N. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (5th ed.-revised). CAOT Publications ACE. 2019.
Krasny-Pacini A, Hiebel J, Pauly F, Godon S, Chevignard M. Goal Attainment Scaling in rehabilitation: A literature-based update. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 2013;56(3):212-30.
Ottenbacher KJ, Cusick A. Goal Attainment Scaling as a Method of Clinical Service Evaluation. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 1990;44(6):519-25.
Steenbeek D, Ketelaar M, Lindeman E, Galama K, Gorter JW. Interrater Reliability of Goal Attainment Scaling in Rehabilitation of Children With Cerebral Palsy. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2010;91(3):429-35.
Krasny-Pacini A, Evans J, Sohlberg MM, Chevignard M. Proposed Criteria for Appraising Goal Attainment Scales Used as Outcome Measures in Rehabilitation Research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2016;97(1):157-70.
Krasny-Pacini A, Estival S, Laurier V, Maugard C, Isner-Horobeti MV, Pradeau C, et al. A rating system to evaluate the quality of Goal Attainment Scales used as outcome measures in rehabilitation. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 2023; (forthcoming)
Peng CYJ, Chen LT. Assessing Intervention Effects in the Presence of Missing Scores. Education Sciences. 2021;11(2):76.
Kratochwill TR, Hitchcock JH, Horner RH, Levin JR, Odom SL, Rindskopf DM, et al. Single-Case Intervention Research Design Standards. Remedial and Special Education. 2013;34(1):26-38.
Landis JR, Koch GG. The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159.
Chevignard M, Toure H, Brugel DG, Poirier J, Laurent-Vannier A. A comprehensive model of care for rehabilitation of children with acquired brain injuries. Child: Care, Health and Development. 2010;36(1):31-43.
Manolov R, Tanious R. Assessing Consistency in Single-Case Data Features Using Modified Brinley Plots. Behav Modif. 2022;46(3):581-627.
Parker RI, Vannest K. An Improved Effect Size for Single-Case Research: Nonoverlap of All Pairs. Behavior Therapy. 2009;40(4):357-67.
Pustejovsky JE. Procedural sensitivities of effect sizes for single-case designs with directly observed behavioral outcome measures. Psychological Methods. 2019;24(2):217-35.
Edgington ES. An Additive Method for Combining Probability Values from Independent Experiments. The Journal of Psychology. 1972;80(2):351-63.
Grissom RJ, Kim JJ. Review of assumptions and problems in the appropriate conceptualization of effect size. Psychological Methods. 2001;6(2):135-46.
Pustejovsky JE. Standard errors and confidence intervals for NAP [Internet]. 2016. Available at: https://www.jepusto.com/nap-ses-and-cis/.
Gafurov BS. The single-case data-analysis ExPRT (Excel Package of Randomization Tests). In: Kratochwill TR, Levin JR, editors. Single-case intervention research: Methodological and statistical advances [Internet]. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2014 [cited 9 May 2022]. p. 185-219. Available at: http://content.apa.org/books/14376-007.
Krasny-Pacini A. Single-case experimental designs for child neurological rehabilitation and developmental disability research. Develop Med Child Neurol. 2023;65(5):611-24.
Pustejovsky JE, Hedges LV, Shadish WR. Design-Comparable Effect Sizes in Multiple Baseline Designs: A General Modeling Framework. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 2014;39(5):368-93.
Declercq L, Cools W, Beretvas SN, Moeyaert M, Ferron JM, Van den Noortgate W. MultiSCED: A tool for (meta-)analyzing single-case experimental data with multilevel modeling. Behav Res. 2020;52(1):177-92.
Ferron JM, Farmer JL, Owens CM. Estimating individual treatment effects from multiple-baseline data: A Monte Carlo study of multilevel-modeling approaches. Behavior Research Methods. 2010;42(4):930-43.
Ferron JM, Bell BA, Hess MR, Rendina-Gobioff G, Hibbard ST. Making treatment effect inferences from multiple-baseline data: The utility of multilevel modeling approaches. Behavior Research Methods. 2009;41(2):372-84.
Gomez INB, Palomo SAM, Vicuña AMU, Bustamante JAD, Eborde JME, Regala KA, et al. Performance-Based Executive Function Instruments Used by Occupational Therapists for Children: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties. Blanche EI, editor. Occupational Therapy International. 2021;2021:1-13.
Chevignard M, Kerrouche B, Krasny-Pacini A, Mariller A, Pineau-Chardon E, Notteghem P, et al. Ecological Assessment of Everyday Executive Functioning at Home and at School Following Childhood Traumatic Brain Injury Using the BRIEF Questionnaire: Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 2017;32(6):E1-12.
Stubberud J, Holthe IL, Løvstad M, Schanke AK, Brandt A, Finnanger T. The feasibility and acceptability of goal management training of executive functions in children with spina bifida and acquired brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 2021;31(4):601-20.
Bjorklund DF. Learning to thing on their own: Executive Function, Strategies, and Problem Solving. In: Children's Thinking: Cognitive Developement and Individual Differences. Fifth Edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth; 2011. p. 248-300.
Bernardi M, Leonard HC, Hill EL, Botting N, Henry LA. Executive functions in children with developmental coordination disorder: a 2-year follow-up study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018;60(3):306-13.
Blank R, Barnett AL, Cairney J, Green D, Kirby A, Polatajko H, et al. International clinical practice recommendations on the definition, diagnosis, assessment, intervention, and psychosocial aspects of developmental coordination disorder. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019;61(3):242-85.
Martini R, Shore BM. Pointing to parallels in ability-related differences in the use of metacognition in academic and psychomotor tasks. Learning and Individual Differences. 2008;18(2):237-47.
Hart T, Giovannetti T, Montgomery MW, Schwartz MF. Awareness of Errors in Naturalistic Action after Traumatic Brain Injury: Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 1998;13(5):16-28.
Krasny-Pacini A, Limond J, Evans J, Hiebel J, Bendjelida K, Chevignard M. Context-Sensitive Goal Management Training for Everyday Executive Dysfunction in Children After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation. 2014;29(5):E49-64.
Durish CL, Yeates KO, Stancin T, Taylor HG, Walz NC, Wade SL. Home Environment as a Predictor of Long-Term Executive Functioning following Early Childhood Traumatic Brain Injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2018;24(1):11-21.
Chavez-Arana C, Catroppa C, Carranza-Escárcega E, Godfrey C, Yáñez-Téllez G, Prieto-Corona B, et al. A Systematic Review of Interventions for Hot and Cold Executive Functions in Children and Adolescents With Acquired Brain Injury. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 2018;43(8):928-42.
Capistran J, Martini R. Exploring inter-task transfer following a CO-OP approach with four children with DCD: A single subject multiple baseline design. Human Movement Science. 2016;49:277-90.
Diamond A, Lee K. Interventions Shown to Aid Executive Function Development in Children 4 to 12 Years Old. Science. 2011;333(6045):959-64.
McEwen S, Houldin A. Generalization and transfer in the CO-OP approach. In: Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance in Occupational Therapy. Bethesda: AOTA Press; 2017. p. 31-42.
Maloney KA, Schmidt AT, Hanten GR, Levin HS. Executive dysfunction in children and adolescents with behavior disorders and traumatic brain injury. Child Neuropsychology. 2020;26(1):69-82.
Keenan HT, Clark AE, Holubkov R, Cox CS, Ewing-Cobbs L. Trajectories of Children's Executive Function After Traumatic Brain Injury. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(3):e212624.

Auteurs

Hélène Lebrault (H)

Rehabilitation Department for Children with Acquired Neurological Injury, Saint-Maurice Hospitals, Saint-Maurice, France.
Sorbonne Université, CNRS, INSERM, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale, LIB, Paris, France.
Sorbonne Université, GRC 24, Handicap Moteur et Cognitif et Réadaptation (HaMCRe), Paris, France.

Rose Martini (R)

Occupational Therapy Program, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Rumen Manolov (R)

Department of Social Psychology and Quantitative Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Céline Chavanne (C)

Rehabilitation Department for Children with Acquired Neurological Injury, Saint-Maurice Hospitals, Saint-Maurice, France.

Agata Krasny-Pacini (A)

Pôle de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, Institut Universitaire de Réadaptation Clemenceau (IURC), Strasbourg, France.
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Unité INSERM 1114 Neuropsychologie Cognitive et Physiopathologie De La Schizophrenie, Département De Psychiatrie, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

Mathilde Chevignard (M)

Rehabilitation Department for Children with Acquired Neurological Injury, Saint-Maurice Hospitals, Saint-Maurice, France.
Sorbonne Université, CNRS, INSERM, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Biomédicale, LIB, Paris, France.
Sorbonne Université, GRC 24, Handicap Moteur et Cognitif et Réadaptation (HaMCRe), Paris, France.

Classifications MeSH