The Value of Transanal Normal Saline Infusion-Assisted Multipath Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of T1/T2 Rectal Cancer.
Journal
Ultrasound quarterly
ISSN: 1536-0253
Titre abrégé: Ultrasound Q
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8809459
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Oct 2023
02 Oct 2023
Historique:
medline:
4
10
2023
pubmed:
4
10
2023
entrez:
4
10
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
This study aims to assess the application value of transanal normal saline infusion-assisted multipath ultrasonography (TNSI-MU) in the diagnosis of T1/T2 rectal cancer (RC). All patients first received single-path 360-degree transrectal ultrasonography and then received 360-degree transrectal ultrasonography, transabdominal ultrasonography, or transvaginal ultrasonography after TNSI to determine the T stage. With surgical pathology as the criterion standard, the detection rates of T1/T2 RC lesions and the T-staging results of single-path 360-degree transrectal ultrasonography, TNSI-MU, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were compared and analyzed. T1/T2 RC was surgically and pathologically confirmed in 52 patients. Single-path 360-degree transrectal ultrasonography had a lesion detection rate of 57.69% (30/52) and a T-staging accuracy of 80.0% (24/30), the sensitivity was 57.69%, and the specificity was 88.46%. Transanal normal saline infusion-assisted multipath ultrasonography had a lesion detection rate of 100%, and its T-staging accuracy was 84.62% (44/52), the sensitivity was 100%, and the specificity was 88.61%. Transanal normal saline infusion-assisted multipath ultrasonography had a significantly higher detection rate of T1/T2 RC lesions than single-path 360-degree transrectal ultrasonography (P < 0.001), but the 2 methods had similar T-staging accuracy for T1/T2 RC (χ2 = 0.286, P = 0.593). Contrast-enhanced MRI had a lesion detection rate of 100% and a T-staging accuracy of 40.38% (21/52), the sensitivity was 98.07%, and the specificity was 61.54%. Transanal normal saline infusion-assisted multipath ultrasonography had significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than contrast-enhanced MRI for T staging of T1/T2 RC (P < 0.001), and the diagnostic results of the 2 methods were not consistent (κ = 0.151). Transanal normal saline infusion-assisted multipath ultrasonography outperformed single-path 360-degree transrectal ultrasonography in the detection rate of T1/T2 RC lesions and contrast-enhanced MRI in the staging accuracy for T1/T2 RC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37793135
doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000668
pii: 00013644-990000000-00051
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249.
Detering R, van Oostendorp SE, Meyer VM, et al. MRI cT1-2 rectal cancer staging accuracy: a population-based study. Br J Surg. 2020;107(10):1372–1382.
Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, et al. Rectal cancer, version 2.2022, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022;20(10):1139–1167.
El Hajj II, DeWitt J, Sherman S, et al. Prospective evaluation of the performance and interobserver variation in endoscopic ultrasound staging of rectal cancer. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;30(9):1013–1018.
Gao Y, Hu JL, Zhang XX, et al. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound in rectal cancer and its use in transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2020;29(2):90–97.
Li XT, Zhang XY, Sun YS, et al. Evaluating rectal tumor staging with magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and endoluminal ultrasound: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(44):e5333.
Endorectal ultrasonography and pelvic magnetic resonance imaging show similar diagnostic accuracy in local staging of rectal cancer: an update systematic review and meta-analysis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;12(1):5.
Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, et al. Colon cancer, version 2.2021, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021;19(3):329–359.
Oien K, Forsmo HM, Rösler C, et al. Endorectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for staging of early rectal cancers: how well does it work in practice? Acta Oncol. 2019;58(sup 1):S49–S54.
O'Connell E, Galvin R, McNamara DA, et al. The utility of preoperative radiological evaluation of early rectal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2020 Sep;22(9):1076–1084.
Cote A, Graur F, Lebovici A, et al. The accuracy of endorectal ultrasonography in rectal cancer staging. Clujul Med. 2015;88(3):348–356.
Yuan Y, Lu H, Ma X, et al. Is rectal filling optimal for MRI-based radiomics in preoperative T staging of rectal cancer? Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022;47(5):1741–1749.
Feng Y, Peng C, Zhu Y, et al. Biplane transrectal ultrasonography plus ultrasonic elastosonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in T staging of rectal cancer. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):862–868.
Opara CO, Khan FY, Kabiraj DG, et al. The value of magnetic resonance imaging and endorectal ultrasound for the accurate preoperative T-staging of rectal cancer. Cureus. 2022;14(10):e30499.