Intonation Units in Spontaneous Speech Evoke a Neural Response.

delta-band speech tracking electroencephalography general linear model intonation units speech prosody spontaneous speech processing

Journal

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience
ISSN: 1529-2401
Titre abrégé: J Neurosci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8102140

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 08 02 2023
revised: 16 08 2023
accepted: 29 08 2023
pmc-release: 29 05 2024
medline: 1 12 2023
pubmed: 5 10 2023
entrez: 4 10 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Spontaneous speech is produced in chunks called intonation units (IUs). IUs are defined by a set of prosodic cues and presumably occur in all human languages. Recent work has shown that across different grammatical and sociocultural conditions IUs form rhythms of ∼1 unit per second. Linguistic theory suggests that IUs pace the flow of information in the discourse. As a result, IUs provide a promising and hitherto unexplored theoretical framework for studying the neural mechanisms of communication. In this article, we identify a neural response unique to the boundary defined by the IU. We measured the EEG of human participants (of either sex), who listened to different speakers recounting an emotional life event. We analyzed the speech stimuli linguistically and modeled the EEG response at word offset using a GLM approach. We find that the EEG response to IU-final words differs from the response to IU-nonfinal words even when equating acoustic boundary strength. Finally, we relate our findings to the body of research on rhythmic brain mechanisms in speech processing. We study the unique contribution of IUs and acoustic boundary strength in predicting delta-band EEG. This analysis suggests that IU-related neural activity, which is tightly linked to the classic Closure Positive Shift (CPS), could be a time-locked component that captures the previously characterized delta-band neural speech tracking.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37793909
pii: JNEUROSCI.0235-23.2023
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0235-23.2023
pmc: PMC10697392
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

8189-8200

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 the authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Références

Nat Neurosci. 1999 Feb;2(2):191-6
pubmed: 10195205
Nat Neurosci. 2016 Jan;19(1):158-64
pubmed: 26642090
Nat Neurosci. 2022 Mar;25(3):369-380
pubmed: 35260860
Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 28;10(1):15846
pubmed: 32985572
J Neurosci. 2019 Sep 18;39(38):7564-7575
pubmed: 31371424
PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Jul;5(7):e1000436
pubmed: 19609344
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2022 Sep 1;17(9):788-801
pubmed: 35137224
J Mem Lang. 2016 Oct;90:1-13
pubmed: 30853752
Elife. 2022 Jan 21;11:
pubmed: 35060904
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Oct;81(Pt B):181-187
pubmed: 28212857
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 15;147:32-42
pubmed: 27903440
PLoS Biol. 2013 Dec;11(12):e1001752
pubmed: 24391472
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 30;12(1):14759
pubmed: 36042220
Neuroimage. 2002 Apr;15(4):870-8
pubmed: 11906227
J Psycholinguist Res. 1996 Mar;25(2):193-247
pubmed: 8667297
J Neurosci. 2020 Dec 2;40(49):9467-9475
pubmed: 33097640
Nat Neurosci. 2012 Mar 18;15(4):511-7
pubmed: 22426255
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Nov 30;10:604
pubmed: 27965557
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Sep;19(9):1421-34
pubmed: 17714005
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:156869
pubmed: 21253357
Curr Biol. 2022 Sep 26;32(18):4093-4100.e6
pubmed: 36007527
Curr Biol. 2015 Jun 15;25(12):1649-53
pubmed: 26028433
Brain Lang. 2014 Oct;137:91-102
pubmed: 25190329
Neuroreport. 2010 Jan 6;21(1):8-13
pubmed: 19884867
Psychophysiology. 2015 Feb;52(2):157-68
pubmed: 25141770
PLoS Biol. 2018 Mar 12;16(3):e2004473
pubmed: 29529019
PLoS Biol. 2022 Jul 14;20(7):e3001713
pubmed: 35834569
Brain Lang. 2003 Jul;86(1):142-64
pubmed: 12821421
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Nov;23(11):913-926
pubmed: 31606386
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:831409
pubmed: 21403915
Brain Res. 2015 Apr 7;1603:101-13
pubmed: 25636270
Cereb Cortex. 2017 Sep 1;27(9):4293-4302
pubmed: 27566979
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Jul;134(1):628-39
pubmed: 23862837
Cortex. 2020 Nov;132:296-308
pubmed: 33010739
Network. 2001 Aug;12(3):289-316
pubmed: 11563531
Eur J Neurosci. 2019 Dec;50(11):3831-3842
pubmed: 31287601
Linguist Vanguard. 2021 Feb 9;7(1):20190063
pubmed: 35880210
Cereb Cortex. 2021 Jul 29;31(9):4289-4299
pubmed: 33949654
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Mar;17(3):407-21
pubmed: 15814001

Auteurs

Maya Inbar (M)

Department of Linguistics, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem 9190501, Israel maya.inbar@gmail.com ayelet.landau@mail.huji.ac.il.
Department of Psychology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem 9190501, Israel.
Department of Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem 9190501, Israel.

Shir Genzer (S)

Department of Psychology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem 9190501, Israel.

Anat Perry (A)

Department of Psychology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem 9190501, Israel.

Eitan Grossman (E)

Department of Linguistics, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem 9190501, Israel.

Ayelet N Landau (AN)

Department of Psychology, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem 9190501, Israel maya.inbar@gmail.com ayelet.landau@mail.huji.ac.il.
Department of Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, Jerusalem 9190501, Israel.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH