Art therapy-based interventions to address burnout and psychosocial distress in healthcare workers-a systematic review.
Anxiety
Art therapy
Burnout
Healthcare worker
Psychosocial distress
Stress
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Oct 2023
04 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
11
03
2023
accepted:
23
08
2023
medline:
2
11
2023
pubmed:
5
10
2023
entrez:
4
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Burnout and psychosocial distress are serious and growing issues for healthcare workers (HCWs) and healthcare systems across the globe. Exacerbated by changes in healthcare delivery during and following the Covid-19 pandemic, these issues negatively affect HCW wellbeing, clinical outcomes and patient safety. Art Therapy has demonstrated promise as a suitable but under researched intervention, warranting further investigation. This systematic review aims to ascertain what art therapy-based interventions used to address burnout and / or psychosocial distress in HCWs have been reported in the health and social care literature and how these have been evaluated. Six databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ProQuest Central), Google Scholar and three clinical trial registries (CENTRAL, ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched for studies using art therapy-based methods to engage with burnout risk or psychosocial distress in HCWs. Following screening for eligibility study characteristics and outcomes were extracted by two reviewers independently. Studies were evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tools. Outcomes were grouped for analysis. Quantitative and qualitative results were synthesised and integrated using narrative synthesis. Twenty-seven studies, drawn from thirteen countries, spanning five continents were selected for inclusion. Fifty percent were published in the last five years, indicating growing global research in the field. Fourteen studies used quantitative research methods and thirteen used qualitative methods. A total of 1580 participants took part in the studies, with nurses most broadly represented (59%). Interventions were mostly delivered in groups (95%) and by an art therapist (70%). Heterogeneity and insufficient randomised controlled trials precluded the possibility of meta-analysis. However, a review of available data showed evidence of medium to large effects for emotional exhaustion (burnout), work-related stress and common mental health issues. A content analysis of qualitative data of perceived effect complemented quantitative findings. Global research into the use of art therapy-based methods to address burnout and psychosocial distress in HCWs is growing. Whilst further high-quality evidence such as randomised controlled trials would be beneficial, findings suggest that art therapy-based methods should be strongly considered as an acceptable and effective treatment for symptoms of emotional exhaustion (burnout) and psychosocial distress in HCWs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Burnout and psychosocial distress are serious and growing issues for healthcare workers (HCWs) and healthcare systems across the globe. Exacerbated by changes in healthcare delivery during and following the Covid-19 pandemic, these issues negatively affect HCW wellbeing, clinical outcomes and patient safety. Art Therapy has demonstrated promise as a suitable but under researched intervention, warranting further investigation. This systematic review aims to ascertain what art therapy-based interventions used to address burnout and / or psychosocial distress in HCWs have been reported in the health and social care literature and how these have been evaluated.
METHODS
METHODS
Six databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ProQuest Central), Google Scholar and three clinical trial registries (CENTRAL, ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched for studies using art therapy-based methods to engage with burnout risk or psychosocial distress in HCWs. Following screening for eligibility study characteristics and outcomes were extracted by two reviewers independently. Studies were evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tools. Outcomes were grouped for analysis. Quantitative and qualitative results were synthesised and integrated using narrative synthesis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Twenty-seven studies, drawn from thirteen countries, spanning five continents were selected for inclusion. Fifty percent were published in the last five years, indicating growing global research in the field. Fourteen studies used quantitative research methods and thirteen used qualitative methods. A total of 1580 participants took part in the studies, with nurses most broadly represented (59%). Interventions were mostly delivered in groups (95%) and by an art therapist (70%). Heterogeneity and insufficient randomised controlled trials precluded the possibility of meta-analysis. However, a review of available data showed evidence of medium to large effects for emotional exhaustion (burnout), work-related stress and common mental health issues. A content analysis of qualitative data of perceived effect complemented quantitative findings.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Global research into the use of art therapy-based methods to address burnout and psychosocial distress in HCWs is growing. Whilst further high-quality evidence such as randomised controlled trials would be beneficial, findings suggest that art therapy-based methods should be strongly considered as an acceptable and effective treatment for symptoms of emotional exhaustion (burnout) and psychosocial distress in HCWs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37794353
doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09958-8
pii: 10.1186/s12913-023-09958-8
pmc: PMC10552408
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Meta-Analysis
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1059Subventions
Organisme : Barts Charity
ID : G-002063
Organisme : Barts Charity
ID : MRC&U0042
Informations de copyright
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Mayo Clin Proc. 2016 Apr;91(4):422-31
pubmed: 27046522
Am J Med. 2022 Oct;135(10):1255-1262.e5
pubmed: 35576997
Int J Nurs Stud. 2022 Mar;127:104180
pubmed: 35125207
BMJ. 2014 Mar 07;348:g1687
pubmed: 24609605
Arts Health. 2021 Feb;13(1):98-106
pubmed: 32772810
Int J Public Health. 2022 Jun 09;67:1604710
pubmed: 35755953
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 May;35:100808
pubmed: 33778435
Public Health. 2021 Jul;196:217-222
pubmed: 34274696
Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 22;5:1573
pubmed: 25657627
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2014 May;20(5):233-40
pubmed: 24852030
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Dec 13;10(12):
pubmed: 36554048
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2022 Dec 1;28(6):686-694
pubmed: 36302198
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Nov 27;12:181
pubmed: 23185978
BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700
pubmed: 19622552
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jun 4;170(11):784-790
pubmed: 31132791
Psychiatry Res. 2022 May;311:114501
pubmed: 35320759
Int J Nurs Pract. 2018 Dec;24(6):e12687
pubmed: 30079550
Palliat Med. 2021 Jan;35(1):6-26
pubmed: 33063609
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 21;12:744443
pubmed: 34744918
J Marital Fam Ther. 2020 Apr;46(2):321-336
pubmed: 31436335
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 10;12:758849
pubmed: 34858231
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 30;22(1):624
pubmed: 35354449
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 20;18(8):
pubmed: 33924026
Death Stud. 2015 Jan-Jun;39(1-5):44-51
pubmed: 24870589
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 13;8:2155
pubmed: 29326619
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Oct;42:153-161
pubmed: 31557665
BMJ. 2021 Jun 8;373:n1461
pubmed: 34103332
BMJ. 2020 Jan 16;368:l6890
pubmed: 31948937
Local Reg Anesth. 2020 Oct 28;13:171-183
pubmed: 33149664
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9
pubmed: 19565683
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):407-15
pubmed: 21247734