Interproximal contact loss between implant restorations and adjacent natural teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Implant complications
interproximal contact loss
open proximal contact
single implant crowns
Journal
Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists
ISSN: 1532-849X
Titre abrégé: J Prosthodont
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9301275
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Oct 2023
04 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
15
06
2023
accepted:
01
10
2023
pubmed:
5
10
2023
medline:
5
10
2023
entrez:
5
10
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
This systematic review was conducted to evaluate the prevalence of interproximal contact loss (ICL) between implant restorations and adjacent teeth in relation to age, gender, follow-up time, and arch location. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and was registered in the Open Science Framework (OSF). The formulated population, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) question was "What is the prevalence of the ICL between implant restoration and adjacent teeth?" The search strategy used four main electronic databases and an additional manual search was performed until February 2023. Clinical studies that evaluated the prevalence of interproximal open contact between implant restorations and adjacent teeth were included. A qualitative analysis for clinical studies was used to assess the risk of bias. In addition, a single-arm meta-analysis of proportion was performed to evaluate the percentage of mesial versus distal open contact and total ICL between implant restoration and adjacent teeth. Fifteen studies published between 2014 and 2023 met the eligibility criteria. Seven studies presented ICL rates higher than 20%. All studies evaluated ICL in posterior regions (molar, premolar area). Five studies had an ICL rate lower than 50% and three studies had an ICL rate higher than 50%. One study assessed the interproximal contact at three months post-restoration insertion, four studies assessed the interproximal contact at 1-year follow-up and nine studies evaluated the interproximal contact over 2 years of follow-up. Mesial and distal ICL rates were 44.2% (95% CI: 30.6% to 58.6%) and 27.5% (95% CI: 10.5% to 55.0%), respectively. The heterogeneity between studies was high (I Based on the results of the included studies, the prevalence of ICL was high, occurring more frequently at the mesial contact. There were no significant differences in relation to age, gender, and arch location.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Prosthodontics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Prosthodontists.
Références
Wong AT, Wat PY, Pow EH, Leung KC. Proximal contact loss between implant-supported prostheses and adjacent natural teeth: a retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(4):e68-e71.
Pjetursson BE, Bragger U, Lang NP, Zwahlen M. Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs). Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(Suppl 3):97-113.
Ren S, Lin Y, Hu X, Wang Y. Changes in proximal contact tightness between fixed implant prostheses and adjacent teeth: a 1-year prospective study. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115(4):437-440.
Shi JY, Zhu Y, Gu YX, Lai HC. Proximal contact alterations between implant-supported restorations and adjacent natural teeth in the posterior region: a 1-year preliminary study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019;34(1):165-168.
Koori H, Morimoto K, Tsukiyama Y, Koyano K. Statistical analysis of the diachronic loss of interproximal contact between fixed implant prostheses and adjacent teeth. Int J Prosthodont. 2010;23(6):535-540.
Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90(2):121-132.
Pjetursson BE, Thoma D, Jung R, Zwahlen M, Zembic A. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;6:22-38.
Liang CH, Nien CY, Chen YL, Hsu KW. The prevalence and associated factors of proximal contact loss between implant restoration and adjacent tooth after function: a retrospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020;22(3):351-358.
Chen Q, Shi Y, Zhang Z, Song G. A single-center study of a resin inlay dental implant-fixed prosthesis for closing proximal contact loss in 89 patients who underwent 3-year follow-up. Med Sci Monit. 2021;4:27:e933809.
Richter EJ. Basic biomechanics of dental implants in prosthetic dentistry. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;61(5):602-609.
Jo DW, Kwon MJ, Kim JH, Kim JK, Yi YJ. Evaluation of adjacent tooth displacement in the posterior implant restoration with proximal contact loss by superimposition of digital models. J Adv Prosthodont. 2019;11(2):88-94.
Kandathilparambil MR, Nelluri VV, Vayadadi BC, Gajjam NK. Evaluation of biological changes at the proximal contacts between single-tooth implant-supported prosthesis and the adjacent natural teeth-an in vivo study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020;20(4):378-386.
Jeong JS, Chang M. Food impaction and periodontal/peri-implant tissue conditions in relation to the embrasure dimensions between implant-supported fixed dental prostheses and adjacent teeth: a cross-sectional study. J Periodontol. 2015;86(12):1314-1320.
Latimer JM, Gharpure AS, Kahng HJ, Aljofi FE, Daubert DM. Interproximal open contacts between implant restorations and adjacent natural teeth as a risk-indicator for peri-implant disease-A cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021;32(5):598-607.
Mehanna S, Habre-Hallage P. Proximal contact alterations between implant-supported restorations and adjacent teeth in the posterior region: a 3-month prospective study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021;13(5):e479-e486.
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):e1-34.
Bento VAA, Gomes JML, Lemos CAA, Limirio JPJ, Rosa CDD. Prevalence of proximal contact loss between implant-supported prostheses and adjacent natural teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2023;129(3):404-412.
Wells BS, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Shea B, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. 2019. Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed December 29, 2022.
Bompolaki D, Edmondson SA, Katancik JA. Interproximal contact loss between implant-supported restorations and adjacent natural teeth: a retrospective cross-sectional study of 83 restorations with an up to 10-year follow-up. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;127(3):418-424.
Byun SJ, Heo SM, Ahn SG, Chang M. Analysis of proximal contact loss between implant-supported fixed dental prostheses and adjacent teeth in relation to influential factors and effects. A cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(6):709-714.
Saber A, Chakar C, Mokbel N, Nohra J. Prevalence of interproximal contact loss between implant-supported fixed prostheses and adjacent teeth and its impact on marginal bone loss: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020;35(3):625-630.
Pang NS, Suh CS, Kim KD, Park W, Jung BY. Prevalence of proximal contact loss between implant-supported fixed prostheses and adjacent natural teeth and its associated factors: a 7-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(12):1501-1508.
Littlewood SJ, Kandasamy S, Huang G. Retention and relapse in clinical practice. Aust Dent J. 2017;62(Suppl 1):51-57.
Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2010;1(2):97-111.
DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3)177-188.
Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557-560.
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539-1558.
Varthis S, Randi A, Tarnow DP. Prevalence of interproximal open contacts between single-implant restorations and adjacent teeth. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Sep-Oct;31(5):1089-1092. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4432
Kolte AP, Kolte RA, Bawankar P. Proximal contact areas of maxillary anterior teeth and their influence on interdental papilla. Saudi Dent J. 2018 Oct;30(4):324-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2018.05.007
Greenstein G, Carpentieri J, Cavallaro J. Open contacts adjacent to dental implant restorations: etiology, incidence, consequences, and correction. J Am Dent Assoc. 2016 Jan;147(1):28-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2015.06.011
Varthis S, Tarnow DP, Randi A. Interproximal open contacts between implant restorations and adjacent teeth. Prevalence-causes-possible solutions. J Prosthodont. 2019 Feb;28(2):e806-e810. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12980
Sfondouris T, Prestipino V. Chairside management of an open proximal contact on an implant-supported ceramic crown using direct composite resin. J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Jul;122(1):1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.10.019
Zhou T, Wongpairojpanich J, Sareethammanuwat M, Lilakhunakon C, Buranawat B. Digital occlusal analysis of pre and post single posterior implant restoration delivery: a pilot study. PLoS One. 2021 Jul 2;16(7):e0252191. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252191
Chopra A, Sivaraman K, Narayan AI, Balakrishnan D. Etiology and classification of food impaction around implants and implant-retained prosthesis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Apr;21(2):391-397. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12716
Bonfante EA, Leary J, Daher S, Murcko L, Hirayama M, Bergamo ET. Implants Placed in Adolescents Followed for Up to 15.5 Years: a Retrospective Case Series. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 May-Jun;36(3):561-568. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8574
French D, Naito M, Linke B. Interproximal contact loss in a retrospective cross-sectional study of 4325 implants: distribution and incidence and the effect on bone loss and peri-implant soft tissue. J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Aug;122(2):108-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.11.011
Wat PY, Wong AT, Leung KC, Pow EH. Proximal contact loss between implant-supported prostheses and adjacent natural teeth: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2011 Jan;105(1):1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)00174-5
Liu X, Liu J, Zhou J, Tan J. Closing open contacts adjacent to an implant-supported restoration. J Dent Sci. 2019 Jun;14(2):216-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2019.02.004