C-section technique vs minilaparotomy after minimally invasive uterine surgery: a retrospective cohort study.
C-section technique
Laparoscopy
Minilaparotomy
Myomectomy
Pain management
Journal
Archives of gynecology and obstetrics
ISSN: 1432-0711
Titre abrégé: Arch Gynecol Obstet
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8710213
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Oct 2023
05 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
01
08
2023
accepted:
13
09
2023
medline:
5
10
2023
pubmed:
5
10
2023
entrez:
5
10
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Uterine leiomyomas are benign uterine tumors. The choice of surgical treatment is guided by patient's age, desire to preserve fertility or avoid "radical" surgical interventions such as hysterectomy. In laparotomy, the issue of extracting the fibroid from the cavity does not arise. However, in laparoscopy and robotic surgery, this becomes a challenge. The aim of the present study was to determine the optimal surgical approach for fibroid extraction following laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy in terms of postoperative pain, extraction time, overall surgical time, scar size, and patient satisfaction. A total of 51 patients met the inclusion criteria and were considered in our analysis: 33 patients who had undergone the "ExCITE technique" (Group A), and 18 patients a minilaparotomy procedure (Group B), after either simple myomectomy, multiple myomectomy, supracervical hysterectomy, or total hysterectomy. The diagnosis of myoma was histologically confirmed in all cases. Regarding the postoperative pain evaluation, at 6 h, patients reported 4 [3-4] vs 6 [5.3-7] on the VAS in Group A and B, as well as at 12 h, 2 [0-2] vs 3.5 [2.3-4] in Group A and B, respectively: both differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001). No statistically significant difference at 24 h from surgery was found. All patients in Group A were satisfied with the ExCITE technique, while in Group B only 67% of them. The length of the hospital stay was significantly shorter in Group A as compared to Group B (p = 0.007). In terms of the operative time for the extraction of the surgical specimen, overall operative time, and the scar size after the surgery, there was a statistically significant difference for those in Group A. The ExCITE technique does not require specific training and allows the surgeon to offer a minimally invasive surgical option for patients, with also an aesthetic result. It is a safe and standardized approach that ensures tissue extraction without the need for mechanical morcellation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37796281
doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07239-7
pii: 10.1007/s00404-023-07239-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Stewart EA, Friedman AJ, Peck K, Nowak RA (1994) Relative overexpression of collagen type I and collagen type III messenger ribonucleic acids by uterine leiomyomas during the proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79:900–906
pubmed: 8077380
Lippman SA, Warner M, Samuels S, Olive D, Vercellini P, Eskenazi B (2003) Uterine fibroids and gynecologic pain symptoms in a population-based study. Fertil Steril 80:1488–1494
doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(03)02207-6
pubmed: 14667888
Cantuaria GH, Angioli R, Frost L, Duncan R, Penalver MA (1998) Comparison of bimanual examination with ultrasound examination before hysterectomy for uterine leiomyoma. Obstet Gynecol 92:109–112
doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00131-8
pubmed: 9649104
Lasmar RB, Lasmar BP, Moawad NS (2022) Hysteroscopic myomectomy. Medicina (Kaunas) 58(11):1627. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58111627
doi: 10.3390/medicina58111627
pubmed: 36422166
Vitale SG, Laganà AS, Caruso S, Garzon S, Vecchio GM, La Rosa VL, Casarin J, Ghezzi F (2021) Comparison of three biopsy forceps for hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy in postmenopausal patients (HYGREB-1): a multicenter, single-blind randomized clinical trial. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 155(3):425–432. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13669
doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13669
pubmed: 33686708
Vitale SG, Laganà AS, Török P, Lasmar RB, Carugno J, Palumbo M, Tesarik J (2022) Virtual sonographic hysteroscopy in assisted reproduction: a retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 156(1):112–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13651
doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13651
pubmed: 33615469
Vitale SG, Moore O, Riemma G, Carugno J, Yarto ML, Haimovich S (2023) Hysteroscopic laser ablation of symptomatic uterine fibroids: insights from a prospective study. Climacteric. https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2023.2205581
doi: 10.1080/13697137.2023.2205581
pubmed: 37165870
Mc LB (2008) Diagnosis, imaging and anatomical classification of uterine fibroids. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 22:627–642
doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2008.01.006
Van den Bosch T, Dueholm M, Leone FP, Valentin L, Rasmussen CK, Votino A et al (2015) Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 46(3):284–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.14806
doi: 10.1002/uog.14806
pubmed: 25652685
D’Silva EC, Muda AM, Safiee AI, Ghazali WAHW (2018) Five-year lapsed: review of laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy in Putrajaya Hospital. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 7(4):161–166. https://doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_38_18
doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_38_18
pubmed: 30306035
pmcid: 6172868
Mallick R, Odejinmi F (2017) Pushing the boundaries of laparoscopic myomectomy: a comparative analysis of peri-operative outcomes in 323 women undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy in a tertiary referral centre. Gynecol Surg 14(1):22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10397-017-1025-1
doi: 10.1186/s10397-017-1025-1
pubmed: 29200989
pmcid: 5684289
Dubin AK, Wei J, Sullivan S, Udaltsova N, Zaritsky E, Yamamoto MP (2017) Minilaparotomy versus laparoscopic myomectomy after cessation of power morcellation: rate of wound complications. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 24(6):946–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.05.010
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.05.010
pubmed: 28552622
Taylan E, Sahin C, Zeybek B, Akdemir A (2017) Contained morcellation: review of current methods and future directions. Front Surg 4:15
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2017.00015
pubmed: 28352629
pmcid: 5348539
Advincula AP, Truong MD (2015) ExCITE: Minimally invasive tissue extraction made simple with simulation. OBG Manag 27(12):40–45
Della Corte L, Mercorio A, Palumbo M, Viciglione F, Cafasso V, Candice A et al (2022) Minimally invasive anesthesia for laparoscopic hysterectomy: a case series. Arch Gynecol Obstet 306(6):2001–2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06727-6
doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06727-6
pubmed: 35931899
pmcid: 9362356
Giampaolino P, Della Corte L, Mercorio A, Bruzzese D, Coviello A, Grasso G et al (2022) Laparoscopic gynecological surgery under minimally invasive anesthesia: a prospective cohort study. Updates Surg 74(5):1755–1762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-022-01310-9
doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01310-9
pubmed: 35759109
pmcid: 9244282
Laughlin SK, Schroeder JC, Baird DD (2010) New directions in the epidemiology of uterine fibroids. Semin Reprod Med 28:204–217
doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1251477
pubmed: 20414843
pmcid: 5330647
Sheng Y, Hong Z, Wang J, Mao B, Wu Z, Gou Y, Zhao J, Liu Q (2023) Efficacy and safety of robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus laparoscopic myomectomy: a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 21(1):230. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03104-8
doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-03104-8
pubmed: 37507735
pmcid: 10375654
Della Corte L, Fabozzi A, Morra I, Bifulco G, Giampaolino P (2018) Disseminated peritoneal leiomyomatosis 10 years after a laparoscopic myomectomy: a brief communication. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 224:58–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.03.016
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.03.016
pubmed: 29547807
Mercorio A, Della Corte L, Vetrella M, Russo M, Serafino P, Palumbo M et al (2022) Uterine fibroids morcellation: a puzzle topic. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 31(7):1008–1016. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2022.2095872
doi: 10.1080/13645706.2022.2095872
pubmed: 35815667
Cesta M, Kennedy B, Pasic R (2021) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy of a 7400 g uterus. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 28(4):748–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.06.019
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.06.019
pubmed: 32610076
DAlbuquerque IMSC, Cutrim PT, Corinti Son M, Noronha YCC, Tamura Vieira Gomes M, Barison GA (2022) 8144 laparoscopic robot-assisted hysterectomy with vaginal specimen extraction using excite technique of a large uterus. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 29(11):S116–S117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2022.09.376
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.09.376
Pessoa PD, Romano JJ, Ramos GGF, Maranhao DDA, Tamura Vieira Gomes M, Barison GA (2022) Abstract: 7989 Cannonball fibroid robotic myomectomy with specimen extraction using excite technique. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 29(11):S112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2022.09.359
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.09.359
Adler AD, Tam J, Huguelet P, Alaniz VI (2023) Minimally invasive techniques for uterine remnant removal. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 36(2):232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2023.01.060
doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2023.01.060
Brown DN, Deirdre L (2018) Current women's health reviews, vol 14, issue 1. Bentham Science Publishers, pp 42–47. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573404813666170412114155
Wong WS, Lee TC, Lim CE (2010) Novel Vaginal “paper roll” uterine morcellation technique for removal of large (>500 g) uterus. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17(3):374–378
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.02.005
pubmed: 20417430