"We're trained to trust our patients": a qualitative study on the general practitioners' trust in patients for colorectal cancer shared care.

cancer survivors colorectal neoplasms delivery of healthcare general practice integrated physician–patient relations trust

Journal

Family practice
ISSN: 1460-2229
Titre abrégé: Fam Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8500875

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Oct 2023
Historique:
medline: 5 10 2023
pubmed: 5 10 2023
entrez: 5 10 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

In a therapeutic partnership, physicians rely on patients to describe their health conditions, join in shared decision-making, and engage with supported self-management activities. In shared care, the patient, primary care, and specialist services partner together using agreed processes and outputs for the patient to be placed at the centre of their care. However, few empirical studies have explored physicians' trust in patients and its implications for shared care models. To explore trust in patients amongst general practitioners (GPs), and the impacts of trust on GPs' willingness to engage in new models of care, such as colorectal cancer shared care. GP participants were recruited through professional networks for semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were integrity checked, coded inductively, and themes developed iteratively. Twenty-five interviews were analysed. Some GPs view trust as a responsibility of the physician and have a high propensity for trusting patients. For other GPs, trust in patients is developed over successive consultations based on patient characteristics such as honesty, reliability, and proactivity in self-care. GPs were more willing to engage in colorectal cancer shared care with patients with whom they have a developed, trusting relationship. Trust plays a significant role in the patient's access to shared care. The implementation of shared care should consider the relational dynamics between the patient and health care providers. In a therapeutic partnership, physicians rely on patients to describe their health conditions, join in shared decision-making and engage with supported self-management activities. In shared care, the patient, primary care, and specialist services partner together using agreed processes and outputs for the patient to be placed at the centre of their care. Trust is key to this partnership. However, few studies have explored the physicians’ trust in patients and its implications for shared care models. This study aims to explore trust in patients amongst general practitioners (GPs), and the impacts of trust on GPs’ willingness to engage in new models of care, such as colorectal cancer shared care. After analysing 25 interview transcripts with GPs, we found some GPs view trust as a responsibility of the physicians, while in others, trust in patients developed over successive consultations based on patient characteristics such as honesty, reliability, and proactivity in self-care. GPs were more willing to engage in colorectal cancer shared care with patients whom they have a developed, trusting relationship. Trust plays a significant role in the patient’s access to shared care. The rollout of shared care should consider the relational dynamics between the patient and health care providers.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
In a therapeutic partnership, physicians rely on patients to describe their health conditions, join in shared decision-making, and engage with supported self-management activities. In shared care, the patient, primary care, and specialist services partner together using agreed processes and outputs for the patient to be placed at the centre of their care. However, few empirical studies have explored physicians' trust in patients and its implications for shared care models.
AIM OBJECTIVE
To explore trust in patients amongst general practitioners (GPs), and the impacts of trust on GPs' willingness to engage in new models of care, such as colorectal cancer shared care.
METHODS METHODS
GP participants were recruited through professional networks for semi-structured interviews. Transcripts were integrity checked, coded inductively, and themes developed iteratively.
RESULTS RESULTS
Twenty-five interviews were analysed. Some GPs view trust as a responsibility of the physician and have a high propensity for trusting patients. For other GPs, trust in patients is developed over successive consultations based on patient characteristics such as honesty, reliability, and proactivity in self-care. GPs were more willing to engage in colorectal cancer shared care with patients with whom they have a developed, trusting relationship.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Trust plays a significant role in the patient's access to shared care. The implementation of shared care should consider the relational dynamics between the patient and health care providers.
In a therapeutic partnership, physicians rely on patients to describe their health conditions, join in shared decision-making and engage with supported self-management activities. In shared care, the patient, primary care, and specialist services partner together using agreed processes and outputs for the patient to be placed at the centre of their care. Trust is key to this partnership. However, few studies have explored the physicians’ trust in patients and its implications for shared care models. This study aims to explore trust in patients amongst general practitioners (GPs), and the impacts of trust on GPs’ willingness to engage in new models of care, such as colorectal cancer shared care. After analysing 25 interview transcripts with GPs, we found some GPs view trust as a responsibility of the physicians, while in others, trust in patients developed over successive consultations based on patient characteristics such as honesty, reliability, and proactivity in self-care. GPs were more willing to engage in colorectal cancer shared care with patients whom they have a developed, trusting relationship. Trust plays a significant role in the patient’s access to shared care. The rollout of shared care should consider the relational dynamics between the patient and health care providers.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
In a therapeutic partnership, physicians rely on patients to describe their health conditions, join in shared decision-making and engage with supported self-management activities. In shared care, the patient, primary care, and specialist services partner together using agreed processes and outputs for the patient to be placed at the centre of their care. Trust is key to this partnership. However, few studies have explored the physicians’ trust in patients and its implications for shared care models. This study aims to explore trust in patients amongst general practitioners (GPs), and the impacts of trust on GPs’ willingness to engage in new models of care, such as colorectal cancer shared care. After analysing 25 interview transcripts with GPs, we found some GPs view trust as a responsibility of the physicians, while in others, trust in patients developed over successive consultations based on patient characteristics such as honesty, reliability, and proactivity in self-care. GPs were more willing to engage in colorectal cancer shared care with patients whom they have a developed, trusting relationship. Trust plays a significant role in the patient’s access to shared care. The rollout of shared care should consider the relational dynamics between the patient and health care providers.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37797167
pii: 7292153
doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad095
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Royal Australian College of General Practitioners

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press.

Auteurs

Faith R Yong (FR)

School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Safe and Effective Medication Research Collaborative, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Westmead Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney, Westmead, Australia.

Sundresan Naicker (S)

Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

Kerry Uebel (K)

School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Maria Agaliotis (M)

Australian Institute of Health Service Management, College of Business and Economics, University of Tasmania, Rozelle, Australia.

Christopher Chan (C)

School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

John D T Nguyen (JDT)

School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Thanya Pathirana (T)

School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Southport, Australia.

Alexandra Hawkey (A)

Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, Australia.

Kylie Vuong (K)

School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Southport, Australia.

Classifications MeSH