What information sources do Dutch medical specialists use in medical decision-making: a qualitative interview study.
clinical decision-making
clinical reasoning
education & training (see medical education & training)
information management
qualitative research
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 10 2023
05 10 2023
Historique:
medline:
9
10
2023
pubmed:
6
10
2023
entrez:
5
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To explore what information sources medical specialists currently use to inform their medical decision-making. Qualitative, semistructured interviews. A total of 20 semistructured interviews were conducted with 10 surgeons and 10 internal medicine specialists who work in academic and/or regional hospitals in the Netherlands. Medical specialists reported that they primarily rely on their general knowledge and experience, rather than actively using information sources. The sources they use to update their knowledge can be categorised into 'scientific publications', 'guidelines or protocols', and 'presentations and meetings'. When medical specialists feel their general knowledge and experience are insufficient, they use three different approaches to find answers in response to clinical questions: consulting a colleague, actively searching the literature and asking someone else to search the literature. Medical specialists use information sources to update their general knowledge and to find answers to specific clinical questions when they feel their general knowledge and experience are insufficient. An important finding is that medical specialists prefer accessible information sources (eg, consulting colleagues) over existing evidence-based medicine tools.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37798031
pii: bmjopen-2023-073905
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073905
pmc: PMC10565272
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e073905Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
JAMA. 1992 Nov 4;268(17):2420-5
pubmed: 1404801
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114523
pubmed: 34785096
BMJ. 1996 Jan 13;312(7023):71-2
pubmed: 8555924
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016 Dec;34(4):327-335
pubmed: 27804315
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jan 21;16:24
pubmed: 26791566
J Visc Surg. 2010 Dec;147(6):e341-9
pubmed: 21093403
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;:902
pubmed: 17238521
J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Jan;105(1):4-11
pubmed: 28096740
Med Decis Making. 1995 Apr-Jun;15(2):113-9
pubmed: 7783571
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Jun 26;15(6):e122
pubmed: 23803299
J Med Libr Assoc. 2004 Oct;92(4):429-37
pubmed: 15494758
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Jul;139:104144
pubmed: 32334400
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Nov 25;173(21):1962-9
pubmed: 23979118
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 8;22(4):e14979
pubmed: 32181742
Pediatr Phys Ther. 2004 Spring;16(1):19-21
pubmed: 17057467
BMJ. 1999 Aug 7;319(7206):358-61
pubmed: 10435959
Int J Med Inform. 2003 Aug;71(1):9-15
pubmed: 12909153
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2011;122:48-58
pubmed: 21686208
Health Info Libr J. 2007 Jun;24(2):78-94
pubmed: 17584211
Implement Sci. 2020 May 27;15(1):39
pubmed: 32460797
Implement Sci. 2020 Jun 3;15(1):41
pubmed: 32493348