Mycothiol maintains the homeostasis and signalling of nitric oxide in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) M145.
Actinobacteria
Intracellular homeostasis
Mycothiol
Nitric oxide
Secondary metabolism
Signal transduction
Journal
BMC microbiology
ISSN: 1471-2180
Titre abrégé: BMC Microbiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100966981
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 10 2023
05 10 2023
Historique:
received:
08
12
2022
accepted:
01
10
2023
medline:
9
10
2023
pubmed:
6
10
2023
entrez:
5
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Previous studies have revealed a nitric oxide (NO) metabolic cycle in which NO, nitrate (NO To investigate the interaction of MSH with endogenously produced NO, we generated an S. coelicolor A3(2) strain deficient in MSH biosynthesis. This mutant strain exhibited a decrease in low-molecular-weight S-nitrosothiols and intracellular NO levels during culture compared to those of the wild-type strain. Moreover, the mutant strain exhibited reduced activity of the DevS/DevR TCS, a regulator of NO homeostasis and ACT production, from the early stage of culture, along with a decrease in ACT production compared to those of the wild-type strain. This study suggests that MSH maintains intracellular NO homeostasis by forming S-nitrosomycothiol, which induces NO signalling. Finally, we propose a metabolic model in which MSH from endogenously produced NO facilitates the maintenance of both NO homeostasis and signalling in S. coelicolor A3(2) M145.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Previous studies have revealed a nitric oxide (NO) metabolic cycle in which NO, nitrate (NO
RESULTS
To investigate the interaction of MSH with endogenously produced NO, we generated an S. coelicolor A3(2) strain deficient in MSH biosynthesis. This mutant strain exhibited a decrease in low-molecular-weight S-nitrosothiols and intracellular NO levels during culture compared to those of the wild-type strain. Moreover, the mutant strain exhibited reduced activity of the DevS/DevR TCS, a regulator of NO homeostasis and ACT production, from the early stage of culture, along with a decrease in ACT production compared to those of the wild-type strain.
CONCLUSIONS
This study suggests that MSH maintains intracellular NO homeostasis by forming S-nitrosomycothiol, which induces NO signalling. Finally, we propose a metabolic model in which MSH from endogenously produced NO facilitates the maintenance of both NO homeostasis and signalling in S. coelicolor A3(2) M145.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37798648
doi: 10.1186/s12866-023-03036-z
pii: 10.1186/s12866-023-03036-z
pmc: PMC10552308
doi:
Substances chimiques
mycothiol
0
Nitric Oxide
31C4KY9ESH
Cysteine
K848JZ4886
Anthraquinones
0
Bacterial Proteins
0
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
285Informations de copyright
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Antioxid Redox Signal. 2019 Jul 20;31(3):155-210
pubmed: 30499304
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2002;42:585-600
pubmed: 11807184
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Sep 1;95(18):10378-83
pubmed: 9724711
J Bacteriol. 1993 May;175(9):2734-42
pubmed: 8478335
Life Sci. 2004 Jun 25;75(6):639-53
pubmed: 15172174
J Biosci Bioeng. 2015 Sep;120(3):294-8
pubmed: 25683449
J Bacteriol. 2006 Feb;188(3):874-81
pubmed: 16428390
Nature. 2001 Sep 13;413(6852):171-4
pubmed: 11557982
Chem Res Toxicol. 1996 Jul-Aug;9(5):809-20
pubmed: 8828915
FEBS Lett. 2006 May 15;580(11):2712-6
pubmed: 16643903
Microbiologyopen. 2013 Dec;2(6):901-11
pubmed: 24019302
Free Radic Biol Med. 2013 Oct;63:51-64
pubmed: 23660531
Nat Prod Rep. 2008 Dec;25(6):1091-117
pubmed: 19030604
J Bacteriol. 1970 Mar;101(3):821-6
pubmed: 5438050
BMC Genomics. 2014 Dec 04;15:1065
pubmed: 25477071
J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1965 May;18:115-9
pubmed: 14336164
J Biol Chem. 2003 Aug 22;278(34):31584-92
pubmed: 12783887
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999 Feb 16;255(2):239-44
pubmed: 10049692
J Biol Chem. 1997 Jan 31;272(5):2841-5
pubmed: 9006926
Redox Biol. 2019 Jan;20:130-145
pubmed: 30308476
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Mar 24;106(12):4671-6
pubmed: 19261856
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002 Nov;46(11):3348-55
pubmed: 12384335
Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248-54
pubmed: 942051
Nat Chem Biol. 2013 Oct;9(10):657-63
pubmed: 23955366
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Oct 28;100(22):12989-94
pubmed: 14569030
Arch Microbiol. 2001 Nov;176(5):386-90
pubmed: 11702082
Front Plant Sci. 2013 May 08;4:126
pubmed: 23658557
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Sep;51(9):3364-6
pubmed: 17638697
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1997 Dec;61(4):533-616
pubmed: 9409151
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Feb 18;100(4):1541-6
pubmed: 12563033
Chem Rev. 2002 Apr;102(4):993-1018
pubmed: 11942785
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2021 Jun 25;87(14):e0048021
pubmed: 33990302
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999 May 5;1411(2-3):378-84
pubmed: 10320670
Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2012 Dec;16(5-6):498-506
pubmed: 23127359
Arch Biochem Biophys. 1995 Apr 20;318(2):279-85
pubmed: 7733655
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999 May 5;1411(2-3):323-33
pubmed: 10320666
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2008 Sep;72(3):471-94
pubmed: 18772286
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 25;8(7):e70351
pubmed: 23936192
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013 May;1830(5):3173-81
pubmed: 23416062
J Bacteriol. 1978 Mar;133(3):1126-9
pubmed: 417060
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2007 May 15;851(1-2):140-51
pubmed: 17379583
J Biol Chem. 2006 Apr 21;281(16):10778-85
pubmed: 16481315
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Nov 5;110(45):E4256-65
pubmed: 24145454
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013 May;1830(5):3182-98
pubmed: 23075826
J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2016 Feb;69(2):124-7
pubmed: 26374563
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Apr 08;7:472
pubmed: 27092169
Nature. 1987 Jun 11-17;327(6122):524-6
pubmed: 3495737
J Microbiol. 2006 Feb;44(1):121-5
pubmed: 16554727
Biochemistry (Mosc). 1998 Jul;63(7):874-84
pubmed: 9721340
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 25;6:22038
pubmed: 26912114
Physiol Rev. 2007 Jan;87(1):315-424
pubmed: 17237348
Commun Biol. 2022 Jan 11;5(1):32
pubmed: 35017648
Trends Microbiol. 2010 Apr;18(4):149-56
pubmed: 20167493