Clinical utilization of artificial intelligence-based COVID-19 pneumonia quantification using chest computed tomography - a multicenter retrospective cohort study in Japan.
Artificial intelligence (AI)-based analysis
Computer Vision System
Pneumonia
Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome
SARS-CoV-2 infection
Journal
Respiratory research
ISSN: 1465-993X
Titre abrégé: Respir Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101090633
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Oct 2023
05 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
18
07
2023
accepted:
04
09
2023
medline:
9
10
2023
pubmed:
6
10
2023
entrez:
5
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Computed tomography (CT) imaging and artificial intelligence (AI)-based analyses have aided in the diagnosis and prediction of the severity of COVID-19. However, the potential of AI-based CT quantification of pneumonia in assessing patients with COVID-19 has not yet been fully explored. This study aimed to investigate the potential of AI-based CT quantification of COVID-19 pneumonia to predict the critical outcomes and clinical characteristics of patients with residual lung lesions. This retrospective cohort study included 1,200 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 from four hospitals. The incidence of critical outcomes (requiring the support of high-flow oxygen or invasive mechanical ventilation or death) and complications during hospitalization (bacterial infection, renal failure, heart failure, thromboembolism, and liver dysfunction) was compared between the groups of pneumonia with high/low-percentage lung lesions, based on AI-based CT quantification. Additionally, 198 patients underwent CT scans 3 months after admission to analyze prognostic factors for residual lung lesions. The pneumonia group with a high percentage of lung lesions (N = 400) had a higher incidence of critical outcomes and complications during hospitalization than the low percentage group (N = 800). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that AI-based CT quantification of pneumonia was independently associated with critical outcomes (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 10.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.59-19.7), as well as with oxygen requirement (aOR 6.35, 95% CI 4.60-8.76), IMV requirement (aOR 7.73, 95% CI 2.52-23.7), and mortality rate (aOR 6.46, 95% CI 1.87-22.3). Among patients with follow-up CT scans (N = 198), the multivariable analysis revealed that the pneumonia group with a high percentage of lung lesions on admission (aOR 4.74, 95% CI 2.36-9.52), older age (aOR 2.53, 95% CI 1.16-5.51), female sex (aOR 2.41, 95% CI 1.13-5.11), and medical history of hypertension (aOR 2.22, 95% CI 1.09-4.50) independently predicted persistent residual lung lesions. AI-based CT quantification of pneumonia provides valuable information beyond qualitative evaluation by physicians, enabling the prediction of critical outcomes and residual lung lesions in patients with COVID-19.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Computed tomography (CT) imaging and artificial intelligence (AI)-based analyses have aided in the diagnosis and prediction of the severity of COVID-19. However, the potential of AI-based CT quantification of pneumonia in assessing patients with COVID-19 has not yet been fully explored. This study aimed to investigate the potential of AI-based CT quantification of COVID-19 pneumonia to predict the critical outcomes and clinical characteristics of patients with residual lung lesions.
METHODS
METHODS
This retrospective cohort study included 1,200 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 from four hospitals. The incidence of critical outcomes (requiring the support of high-flow oxygen or invasive mechanical ventilation or death) and complications during hospitalization (bacterial infection, renal failure, heart failure, thromboembolism, and liver dysfunction) was compared between the groups of pneumonia with high/low-percentage lung lesions, based on AI-based CT quantification. Additionally, 198 patients underwent CT scans 3 months after admission to analyze prognostic factors for residual lung lesions.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The pneumonia group with a high percentage of lung lesions (N = 400) had a higher incidence of critical outcomes and complications during hospitalization than the low percentage group (N = 800). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that AI-based CT quantification of pneumonia was independently associated with critical outcomes (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 10.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.59-19.7), as well as with oxygen requirement (aOR 6.35, 95% CI 4.60-8.76), IMV requirement (aOR 7.73, 95% CI 2.52-23.7), and mortality rate (aOR 6.46, 95% CI 1.87-22.3). Among patients with follow-up CT scans (N = 198), the multivariable analysis revealed that the pneumonia group with a high percentage of lung lesions on admission (aOR 4.74, 95% CI 2.36-9.52), older age (aOR 2.53, 95% CI 1.16-5.51), female sex (aOR 2.41, 95% CI 1.13-5.11), and medical history of hypertension (aOR 2.22, 95% CI 1.09-4.50) independently predicted persistent residual lung lesions.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
AI-based CT quantification of pneumonia provides valuable information beyond qualitative evaluation by physicians, enabling the prediction of critical outcomes and residual lung lesions in patients with COVID-19.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37798709
doi: 10.1186/s12931-023-02530-2
pii: 10.1186/s12931-023-02530-2
pmc: PMC10552312
doi:
Substances chimiques
Oxygen
S88TT14065
Types de publication
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
241Subventions
Organisme : Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
ID : JP21fk0108563
Organisme : Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
ID : JP21fk0108573
Organisme : Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
ID : JP21jk0210034
Organisme : Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
ID : JP21km0405211
Organisme : Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
ID : JP21wm0325031
Organisme : Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
ID : JP20nk0101612
Organisme : Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
ID : JP20fk0108415
Organisme : Japan Science and Technology Agency
ID : JPMJPR21R7
Organisme : Japan Science and Technology Agency
ID : JPMJCR20H2
Organisme : Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
ID : 20CA2054
Informations de copyright
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Sep 21;8:711435
pubmed: 34621760
Radiology. 2021 Aug;300(2):E328-E336
pubmed: 33724065
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E46-E54
pubmed: 32155105
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023 Jan;25(1):144-155
pubmed: 36056760
Cell. 2020 Jun 11;181(6):1423-1433.e11
pubmed: 32416069
Radiology. 2021 Jun;299(3):E262-E279
pubmed: 33560192
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Aug;8(15):935
pubmed: 32953735
Clin Imaging. 2021 Dec;80:58-66
pubmed: 34246044
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Dec;113:74-81
pubmed: 34601141
Emerg Radiol. 2020 Dec;27(6):701-710
pubmed: 33119835
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2021 Nov-Dec 01;45(6):970-978
pubmed: 34581706
J Clin Invest. 2020 May 1;130(5):2620-2629
pubmed: 32217835
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 May;5(5):428-430
pubmed: 32145190
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 25;384(8):693-704
pubmed: 32678530
Nature. 2022 Sep;609(7928):754-760
pubmed: 35940203
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Mar;19(3):399-406
pubmed: 34410886
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Dec 12;22(1):935
pubmed: 36510172
J Digit Imaging. 2021 Apr;34(2):320-329
pubmed: 33634416
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 20;382(8):727-733
pubmed: 31978945
Eur J Radiol. 2021 Dec;145:110031
pubmed: 34801878
BMC Pulm Med. 2023 Apr 26;23(1):146
pubmed: 37101265
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Jan;32(1):151-160
pubmed: 32883700
Korean J Radiol. 2020 Jul;21(7):859-868
pubmed: 32524786
Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 Jun;22(6):957-966
pubmed: 32412156
Eur Radiol. 2022 Jan;32(1):205-212
pubmed: 34223954
Eur Radiol. 2022 Apr;32(4):2235-2245
pubmed: 34988656
Circulation. 2020 Jul 14;142(2):114-128
pubmed: 32421381
Atherosclerosis. 2021 Jul;328:136-143
pubmed: 33883086
JAMA. 2020 Aug 11;324(6):603-605
pubmed: 32644129
Eur Radiol. 2020 Dec;30(12):6770-6778
pubmed: 32591888
Radiology. 2022 Nov;305(2):479-485
pubmed: 35536134
Nutr Diabetes. 2022 Aug 9;12(1):38
pubmed: 35945221
Nat Commun. 2020 Aug 14;11(1):4080
pubmed: 32796848
J Thorac Imaging. 2021 Mar 1;36(2):65-72
pubmed: 33600123
J Pharm Anal. 2020 Apr;10(2):123-129
pubmed: 32292624
Chest. 2021 Aug;160(2):652-670
pubmed: 33861993
Eur J Radiol. 2021 May;138:109676
pubmed: 33798931
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jun 17;8:689568
pubmed: 34222293
Eur Radiol. 2020 Dec;30(12):6808-6817
pubmed: 32623505
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 11;11(1):417
pubmed: 33432072
Radiology. 2020 Aug;296(2):E86-E96
pubmed: 32301647
Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;96:467-474
pubmed: 32425643
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 May 4;72(9):e206-e214
pubmed: 32674114
Respir Res. 2022 Nov 15;23(1):315
pubmed: 36380316
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Jul;9(7):747-754
pubmed: 33964245
J Clin Med. 2022 Jul 13;11(14):
pubmed: 35887810
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 5;383(19):1813-1826
pubmed: 32445440
Chest. 2021 Jul;160(1):187-198
pubmed: 33676998
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2023 Mar;21(3):133-146
pubmed: 36639608
BMJ. 2021 Jul 26;374:n1648
pubmed: 34312178
Int J Infect Dis. 2023 Jul;132:84-88
pubmed: 37086866
Eur J Radiol. 2020 Sep;130:109202
pubmed: 32745895
Acad Radiol. 2021 Aug;28(8):1048-1057
pubmed: 33741210