Taking a chance on outcome standardisation: A cross-sectional analysis assessing the uptake of the prevention of preterm birth core outcome set in randomised controlled trials.

core outcome sets cross-sectional analysis outcome uptake preterm birth randomised controlled trials

Journal

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
ISSN: 1471-0528
Titre abrégé: BJOG
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100935741

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Oct 2023
Historique:
revised: 25 08 2023
received: 24 07 2023
accepted: 18 09 2023
medline: 6 10 2023
pubmed: 6 10 2023
entrez: 5 10 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Analyse uptake of the core outcome set (COS) within preterm birth (PTB) clinical trials. On 26 June 2023, we conducted a systematic search of phase III/IV trial registry entries regarding PTB interventions via ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trial Registry Platform. These trials were analysed for the outcomes measured. N/A. After searching the two databases, 5257 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were screened, resulting in 92 RCTs for analysis. Inclusion criteria were the following: subjects were patients receiving an intervention for PTB, study enrolment began within 5 years prior to publication of PTB COS to 26 June 2023, and evaluated the efficacy of interventions. Authors screened and extracted data in masked, duplicate fashion, then performed an interrupted time series analysis, analysis of variance and correlation analysis. We extracted outcomes measured by each clinical trial in our sample. Trials were analysed for the percentage of adopted outcomes from PTB COS. After COS publication, there was no significant change in percentage of COS outcomes measured. The most measured outcome was 'offspring mortality' (54.34%, 50/92) and the least measured outcome was 'late neonatal neurodevelopment morbidity' (3.26%, 3/92). Additionally, 22.83% (21/92) of trials measured zero outcomes related to the PTB COS. Our results demonstrated no significant change in outcome measurement before or after PTB COS publication. We recommend focusing on both the measurement of outcomes and the assessments that are used.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37798815
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17681
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008;371(9606):75-84.
Cao G, Liu J, Liu M. Global, regional, and national incidence and mortality of neonatal preterm birth, 1990-2019. JAMA Pediatr. 2022;176(8):787-796.
Behrman RE, Butler AS. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on understanding premature birth and assuring healthy outcomes. Societal costs of preterm birth. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); 2007.
Vogel JP, Chawanpaiboon S, Moller AB, Watananirun K, Bonet M, Lumbiganon P. The global epidemiology of preterm birth. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;52:3-12.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Preterm labour and birth; 2022.
Berkman ND, Santaguida P, Viswanathan M, Morton SC. The empirical evidence of bias in trials measuring treatment differences. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2014.
Webbe JWH, Ali S, Sakonidou S, Webbe T, Duffy JMN, Brunton G, et al. Inconsistent outcome reporting in large neonatal trials: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020;105(1):69-75.
Jones IA, Chen X, Evseenko D, Vangsness CT Jr. Nomenclature inconsistency and selective outcome reporting hinder understanding of stem cell therapy for the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101(2):186-195.
Webbe J, Sinha I, Gale C. Core Outcome Sets. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2018;103(3):163-166.
Kirkham JJ, Williamson P. Core outcome sets in medical research. BMJ Med. 2022;1(1):e000284.
Matvienko-Sikar K, Avery K, Blazeby JM, Devane D, Dodd S, Egan AM, et al. Use of core outcome sets was low in clinical trials published in major medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 2022;142:19-28.
Kirkham JJ, Clarke M, Williamson PR. A methodological approach for assessing the uptake of core outcome sets using ClinicalTrials.gov: findings from a review of randomised controlled trials of rheumatoid arthritis. BMJ. 2017;357:j2262.
van t, Hooft J, Duffy JMN, Daly M, Williamson PR, Meher S, Thom E, et al. A core outcome set for evaluation of interventions to prevent preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(1):49-58.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLoS Med. 2021;18(3):e1003583.
Magee T, Jones G, Magana K, Fitzgerald K, Modi J, Ward S. OSF [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jul 13]. Available from: https://osf.io/s8zxw/
Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP). 2018 Requirements (2018 Common Rule) [Internet]. HHS.gov. US Department of Health and Human Services; 2017 [cited 2023 Jul 7]. Available from: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/45-cfr-46/revised-common-rule-regulatory-text/index.html
COMET Initiative [Internet]. [cited 2023 Mar 22]. Available from: https://www.comet-initiative.org/
COMET Initiative [Internet]. [cited 2023 Jul 17]. Available from: https://comet-initiative.org/About
Clarke M, Williamson PR. Core outcome sets and systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5:11.
Bellucci C, Hughes K, Toomey E, Williamson PR, Matvienko-Sikar K. A survey of knowledge, perceptions and use of core outcome sets among clinical trialists. Trials. 2021;22(1):937.
Williamson PR, Altman DG, Bagley H, Barnes KL, Blazeby JM, Brookes ST, et al. The COMET Handbook: version 1.0. Trials. 2017;18(Suppl 3):280.
Jois RS. Understanding long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes of very and extremely preterm infants: a clinical review. Aust J Gen Pract. 2019;48(1-2):26-31.
Pravia CI, Benny M. Long-term consequences of prematurity. Cleve Clin J Med. 2020;87(12):759-767.
Guide CP. Cerebral palsy care and treatment costs [Internet]. Cerebral Palsy Guide. 2015 [cited 2023 Jul 21]. Available from: https://www.cerebralpalsyguide.com/treatment/costs/
Duffy JMN, Ziebland S, von Dadelszen P, McManus RJ. Tackling poorly selected, collected, and reported outcomes in obstetrics and gynecology research. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(1):71.e1-71.e4.

Auteurs

Chance Bratten (C)

Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.

Laura Tham (L)

Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.

Kimberly Magana (K)

Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.

Shaelyn Ward (S)

Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.

Trevor Magee (T)

Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.

Jay Modi (J)

Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.

Garrett Jones (G)

Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.

Kyle Fitzgerald (K)

Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.

Griffin Hughes (G)

Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.

Alicia Ito Ford (AI)

Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.

Matt Vassar (M)

Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.

Classifications MeSH