Hip Impingement of severe SCFE patients after in situ pinning causes decreased flexion and forced external rotation in flexion on 3D-CT.
Slipped capital femoral epiphysis
femoroacetabular impingement
in situ pinning
three-dimensional computed tomography
Journal
Journal of children's orthopaedics
ISSN: 1863-2521
Titre abrégé: J Child Orthop
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101313582
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
22
11
2022
accepted:
13
07
2023
medline:
6
10
2023
pubmed:
6
10
2023
entrez:
6
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In situ pinning is an accepted treatment for stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis. However, residual deformity of severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis can cause femoroacetabular impingement and forced external rotation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the (1) hip external rotation and internal rotation in flexion, (2) hip impingement location, and (3) impingement frequency in early flexion in severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis patients after in situ pinning using three-dimensional computed tomography. A retrospective Institutional Review Board-approved study evaluating 22 patients (26 hips) with severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis (slip angle > 60°) using postoperative three-dimensional computed tomography after in situ pinning was performed. Mean age at slipped capital femoral epiphysis diagnosis was 13 ± 2 years (58% male, four patients bilateral, 23% unstable, 85% chronic). Patients were compared to contralateral asymptomatic hips (15 hips) with unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (control group). Pelvic three-dimensional computed tomography after in situ pinning was used to generate three-dimensional models. Specific software was used to determine range of motion and impingement location (equidistant method). And 22 hips (85%) underwent subsequent surgery. (1) Severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis patients had significantly (p < 0.001) decreased hip flexion (43 ± 40°) and internal rotation in 90° of flexion (-16 ± 21°, IRF-90°) compared to control group (122 ± 9° and 36 ± 11°). (2) Femoral impingement in maximal flexion was located anterior to anterior-superior (27% on 3 o'clock and 27% on 1 o'clock) of severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis patients and located anterior to anterior-inferior (38% on 3 o'clock and 35% on 4 o'clock) in IRF-90°. (3) However, 21 hips (81%) had flexion < 90° and 22 hips (85%) had < 10° of IRF-90° due to hip impingement and 21 hips (81%) had forced external rotation in 90° of flexion (< 0° of IRF-90°). After in situ pinning, patient-specific three-dimensional models showed restricted flexion and IRF-90° and forced external rotation in 90° of flexion due to early hip impingement and residual deformity in most of the severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis patients. This could help to plan subsequent hip preservation surgery, such as hip arthroscopy or femoral (derotation) osteotomy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37799312
doi: 10.1177/18632521231192462
pii: 10.1177_18632521231192462
pmc: PMC10549698
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
411-419Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990 Jul;72(4):568-73
pubmed: 2380205
J Pediatr Orthop. 2006 May-Jun;26(3):281-5
pubmed: 16670535
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Mar;467(3):692-8
pubmed: 18941860
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018 Apr;26(4):557-563
pubmed: 29426010
Int Orthop. 2019 Mar;43(3):669-675
pubmed: 29797165
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977 Jan;59(1):62-8
pubmed: 833177
J Pediatr Orthop. 2011 Dec;31(8):853-7
pubmed: 22101663
Acta Orthop. 2018 Apr;89(2):222-228
pubmed: 29172934
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jul;471(7):2156-62
pubmed: 23397314
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981 Jan;63(1):85-95
pubmed: 7451529
Bone Joint Res. 2017 Aug;6(8):472-480
pubmed: 28790036
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 May;93 Suppl 2:46-51
pubmed: 21543688
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1967 Jul;49(5):807-35
pubmed: 6029256
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991 Jun;73(5):667-74
pubmed: 2045391
J Child Orthop. 2017 Apr;11(2):147-153
pubmed: 28529664
J Pediatr Orthop. 2007 Oct-Nov;27(7):788-95
pubmed: 17878786
J Orthop Res. 2007 Jan;25(1):122-31
pubmed: 17054112
J Pediatr Orthop. 2012 Mar;32(2):125-30
pubmed: 22327445
J Pediatr Orthop. 2006 May-Jun;26(3):286-90
pubmed: 16670536
J Pediatr Orthop. 2009 Jun;29(4):336-40
pubmed: 19461373
J Orthop Res. 2020 May;38(5):1081-1088
pubmed: 31793021
J Pediatr Orthop. 2010 Jan-Feb;30(1):26-30
pubmed: 20032738
J Pediatr Orthop. 2013 Jul-Aug;33 Suppl 1:S76-82
pubmed: 23764797
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984 Oct;66(8):1151-2
pubmed: 6490691
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1979 Jun;117(3):333-44
pubmed: 463224
J Pediatr Orthop. 1999 Jul-Aug;19(4):419-24
pubmed: 10412987
Acta Orthop Scand. 2000 Aug;71(4):370-5
pubmed: 11028885
J Pediatr Orthop. 2017 Jun;37(4):272-278
pubmed: 26356312
Comput Aided Surg. 2010;15(4-6):75-82
pubmed: 21067316
J Pediatr Orthop B. 1996 Summer;5(3):135-43
pubmed: 8866276
J Pediatr Orthop. 2011 Mar;31(2):153-8
pubmed: 21307709
Comput Aided Surg. 1999;4(3):144-51
pubmed: 10528271
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Sep;470(9):2431-40
pubmed: 22492172
J Pediatr Orthop. 2022 Nov-Dec 01;42(10):e963-e970
pubmed: 36099440
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Dec;(417):112-20
pubmed: 14646708
Orthopade. 2002 Sep;31(9):894-9
pubmed: 12232708
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987 Oct;69(8):1169-76
pubmed: 3667647
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Dec;471(12):3774-80
pubmed: 23463288