Copulatory mechanics of ghost spiders reveals a new self-bracing mechanism in entelegyne spiders.

Anyphaenidae cryofixation genitalia micro‐CT sexual selection sperm transfer

Journal

Ecology and evolution
ISSN: 2045-7758
Titre abrégé: Ecol Evol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101566408

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 31 07 2023
revised: 07 09 2023
accepted: 21 09 2023
medline: 6 10 2023
pubmed: 6 10 2023
entrez: 6 10 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Spiders evolved a distinctive sperm transfer system, with the male copulatory organs located on the tarsus of the pedipalps. In entelegyne spiders, these organs are usually very complex and consist of various sclerites that not only allow the transfer of the sperm themselves but also provide a mechanical interlock between the male and female genitalia. This interlocking can also involve elements that are not part of the copulatory organ such as the retrolateral tibial apophysis (RTA)-a characteristic of the most diverse group of spiders (RTA clade). The RTA is frequently used for primary locking i.e., the first mechanical engagement between male and female genitalia. Despite its functional importance, some diverse spider lineages have lost the RTA, but evolved an apophysis on the femur instead. It can be hypothesized that this femoral apophysis is a functional surrogate of the RTA during primary locking or possibly serves another function, such as self-bracing, which involves mechanical interaction between male genital structures themselves to stabilize the inserted pedipalp. We tested these hypotheses using ghost spiders of the genus

Identifiants

pubmed: 37799446
doi: 10.1002/ece3.10582
pii: ECE310582
pmc: PMC10547672
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e10582

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Références

J Morphol. 2004 Sep;261(3):364-76
pubmed: 15281063
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2019 Jul;136:227-240
pubmed: 30953780
Zootaxa. 2021 Mar 11;4942(1):zootaxa.4942.1.2
pubmed: 33756910
J Morphol. 2023 May;284(5):e21586
pubmed: 37059595
Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676-82
pubmed: 22743772
J Morphol. 2020 Feb;281(2):250-257
pubmed: 31886906
Zootaxa. 2022 May 05;5133(3):355-382
pubmed: 36101094
Zootaxa. 2014 Apr 16;3790:1-35
pubmed: 24869859
Genetica. 2010 Jan;138(1):75-104
pubmed: 19705286
Arthropod Struct Dev. 2015 Jul;44(4):388-97
pubmed: 26014975
J Evol Biol. 2011 Nov;24(11):2378-88
pubmed: 21848985
Zoology (Jena). 2007;110(5):398-408
pubmed: 17869076
Nat Commun. 2019 Mar 21;10(1):1312
pubmed: 30899023

Auteurs

Dante Poy (D)

Division of Arachnology Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales - CONICET Buenos Aires Argentina.

Luis N Piacentini (LN)

Division of Arachnology Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales - CONICET Buenos Aires Argentina.

Shou-Wang Lin (SW)

Zoologisches Institut und Museum Universität Greifswald Greifswald Germany.

Leonel A Martínez (LA)

Division of Arachnology Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales - CONICET Buenos Aires Argentina.

Martín J Ramírez (MJ)

Division of Arachnology Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales - CONICET Buenos Aires Argentina.

Peter Michalik (P)

Zoologisches Institut und Museum Universität Greifswald Greifswald Germany.

Classifications MeSH