Shining Light on Photobleaching: An Artifact That Causes Unnecessary Excitation Among Pathologists.


Journal

Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine
ISSN: 1543-2165
Titre abrégé: Arch Pathol Lab Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7607091

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Oct 2023
Historique:
accepted: 02 08 2023
medline: 6 10 2023
pubmed: 6 10 2023
entrez: 6 10 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Photobleaching artifact occurs when fluorescence intensity decreases following light exposure. Slides stained with fluorescent techniques may be stored in the dark until primary diagnostics. Experimental evidence suggesting the rate of photobleaching and necessity of dark storage is lacking. To compare photobleaching rate on direct immunofluorescence and Thioflavin T slides stored in ambient room light conditions and exposed to excitatory wavelengths. During 2 iterations of the experiment, 45 slides were prepared, 42 with immunofluorescent antibodies plus 3 with thioflavin, from skin and kidney biopsies. The experimental group was stored in room light conditions in comparison to the control in the dark, at room temperature. Further, 1 immunofluorescence slide and 1 thioflavin slide were exposed to excitatory fluorescent light for several hours. Significant photobleaching was defined as integer decrease in score (scale, 0-3). Exposure times ranged from 152 to 3034 hours. Nine of the 42 immunofluorescence slides (21%) photobleached after a minimum exposure of 152 hours to room light, with no significant difference between the experimental and control groups (all P values >.05). The immunofluorescence slide exposed to fluorescent light for 4 hours showed marked photobleaching in the exposed field but not elsewhere. No thioflavin slides showed clinically significant photobleaching under any conditions. Clinically significant photobleaching of slides exposed to room light may occur after a few days, but not a few hours (unless exposed to excitatory fluorescent light). Conversely, thioflavin-stained slides did not photobleach when exposed to ambient room air and only negligibly when exposed to excitatory fluorescent light.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37800669
pii: 496287
doi: 10.5858/arpa.2022-0311-OA
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2023 College of American Pathologists.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have no relevant financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.

Auteurs

Benzion Samueli (B)

From the Department of Pathology, Soroka University Medical Center, Be'er Sheva, Israel; Medical School of International Health and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva, Israel (Samueli).

Yarden Kezerle (Y)

From the Department of Pathology, Soroka University Medical Center, Be'er Sheva, Israel; Medical School of International Health and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva, Israel (Kezerle).

Jacob Dreiher (J)

Hospital Administration, Soroka University Medical Center, Be'er Sheva, Israel; Medical School of International Health and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva, Israel (Dreiher).

Vladislav Osipov (V)

From the Department of Pathology, Soroka University Medical Center, Be'er Sheva, Israel (Osipov).

Rachel Steckbeck (R)

Medical School of International Health and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva, Israel (Steckbeck).

Hananya Vaknine (H)

Institute of Pathology, E. Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel, and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (Vaknine).

Joshua H Baraban (JH)

the Department of Chemistry, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Be'er Sheva, Israel (Baraban).

Classifications MeSH