Tree diversity increases productivity through enhancing structural complexity across mycorrhizal types.
Journal
Science advances
ISSN: 2375-2548
Titre abrégé: Sci Adv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101653440
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 10 2023
06 10 2023
Historique:
medline:
9
10
2023
pubmed:
6
10
2023
entrez:
6
10
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Tree species diversity and mycorrhizal associations play a central role for forest productivity, but factors driving positive biodiversity-productivity relationships remain poorly understood. In a biodiversity experiment manipulating tree diversity and mycorrhizal associations, we examined the roles of above- and belowground processes in modulating wood productivity in young temperate tree communities and potential underlying mechanisms. We found that tree species richness, but not mycorrhizal associations, increased forest productivity by enhancing aboveground structural complexity within communities. Structurally complex communities were almost twice as productive as structurally simple stands, particularly when light interception was high. We further demonstrate that overyielding was largely explained by positive net biodiversity effects on structural complexity with functional variation in shade tolerance and taxonomic diversity being key drivers of structural complexity in mixtures. Consideration of stand structural complexity appears to be a crucial element in predicting carbon sequestration in the early successional stages of mixed-species forests.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37801499
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adi2362
pmc: PMC10558120
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
eadi2362Références
Science. 2016 Oct 14;354(6309):
pubmed: 27738143
Nat Commun. 2010 Jul 27;1:48
pubmed: 20975705
Ecology. 2011 Sep;92(9):1818-27
pubmed: 21939078
Ecosphere. 2018 May 30;9(5):e02226
pubmed: 30323959
Sci Adv. 2023 Jan 18;9(3):eadd4468
pubmed: 36652522
Ann Bot. 2018 Mar 14;121(4):589-601
pubmed: 28961743
Nat Commun. 2023 Mar 13;14(1):1377
pubmed: 36914630
Ecology. 2023 Feb;104(2):e3896
pubmed: 36215064
Science. 2018 Oct 5;362(6410):80-83
pubmed: 30287660
New Phytol. 2015 Mar;205(4):1443-1447
pubmed: 25524234
Ecol Lett. 2019 Dec;22(12):2130-2140
pubmed: 31625279
New Phytol. 2020 Nov;228(4):1256-1268
pubmed: 32496591
Ecol Lett. 2021 May;24(5):996-1006
pubmed: 33657676
Nature. 2001 Jul 5;412(6842):72-6
pubmed: 11452308
Ecology. 2019 Oct;100(10):e02864
pubmed: 31397885
Ecol Lett. 2011 Dec;14(12):1211-9
pubmed: 21955682
J Exp Bot. 2003 Nov;54(392):2403-17
pubmed: 14565947
Ecol Lett. 2020 Jan;23(1):79-87
pubmed: 31631491
Tree Physiol. 2017 Oct 1;37(10):1426-1435
pubmed: 28100711
Oecologia. 2016 Oct;182(2):319-33
pubmed: 27059713
New Phytol. 2021 Nov;232(3):1123-1158
pubmed: 33159479
Ecol Evol. 2021 Apr 02;11(10):5424-5440
pubmed: 34026018
Trends Ecol Evol. 2022 Jul;37(7):573-581
pubmed: 35504748
Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Sep;4(9):1204-1212
pubmed: 32661404
Ecol Lett. 2017 Jul;20(7):892-900
pubmed: 28616871
Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Mar 01;1(4):63
pubmed: 28812675
Nature. 2016 Jan 14;529(7585):204-7
pubmed: 26700807
Science. 2010 Feb 26;327(5969):1129-32
pubmed: 20185724
Nature. 2001 Jun 14;411(6839):792-5
pubmed: 11459056
Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 22;12(1):519
pubmed: 33483481
Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 May;2(5):763-766
pubmed: 29662226
Nat Commun. 2019 Mar 29;10(1):1460
pubmed: 30926809
New Phytol. 2020 Mar;225(5):1835-1851
pubmed: 31514244
BMC Bioinformatics. 2016 Nov 25;17(1):483
pubmed: 27884101
Ecology. 2010 Jan;91(1):299-305
pubmed: 20380219