Surgical Techniques of, and Outcomes after, Distal Muscle Stabilization in Transfemoral Amputation: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.


Journal

Annals of vascular surgery
ISSN: 1615-5947
Titre abrégé: Ann Vasc Surg
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8703941

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 27 02 2023
revised: 05 07 2023
accepted: 06 07 2023
pubmed: 7 10 2023
medline: 7 10 2023
entrez: 6 10 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Distal muscle stabilization, such as myodesis (suturing muscles to bone) or myoplasty (suturing agonistic-antagonistic muscles together), can aid residual limb stabilization, provide a good soft-tissue covering, and increase rehabilitation potential. However, surgical practice varies due to scant clinical data. The aim of this review is to summarize and evaluate the literature regarding techniques and associated outcomes of distal muscle stabilization in transfemoral amputation (TFA). A systematic review and narrative synthesis was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Resources, including observational studies, nonobservational scientific papers, conference proceedings, and textbooks, detailing techniques of TFA distal muscle stabilization were identified from standard medical repositories and library search. A supplementary search of YouTube and Google was undertaken to identify additional resources. Quality assessment was undertaken using Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies-of Interventions; Authority, Accuracy, Coverage, Objectivity, Date, Significance; and modified-Discern tools. Forty seven resources were identified, including 17 journal articles, 17 textbooks, 5 educational websites/eBooks, 5 videos, 2 online presentations, and 1 webpage. Thirty seven described myodesis, 11 described myoplasty, and 6 described closure without distal muscle stabilization. Eight observational studies presented outcome data for 302 TFAs. No studies comparing closure with or without distal muscle stabilization were identified. All papers describing myodesis secured the adductors to the femur, and most also secured the quadriceps and/or hamstrings to this complex. Number of femoral drill holes varied from 1 to 6. Early wound complications occurred in 17% of amputations, whereas myodesis failure occurred in 9.5%. Prosthetic fitting rates were 73% and, where reported, 100% of patients maintained neutral femoral alignment. Distal muscle stabilization, particularly myodesis, is a commonly described technique for TFA, although operative techniques are heterogenous. There is a paucity of outcome data, and no studies comparing it to closures without distal muscle stabilization. However, these low-quality data suggest wound healing rates are equivalent to TFA without distal muscle stabilization while demonstrating improvement to patients' rehabilitation potential.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Distal muscle stabilization, such as myodesis (suturing muscles to bone) or myoplasty (suturing agonistic-antagonistic muscles together), can aid residual limb stabilization, provide a good soft-tissue covering, and increase rehabilitation potential. However, surgical practice varies due to scant clinical data. The aim of this review is to summarize and evaluate the literature regarding techniques and associated outcomes of distal muscle stabilization in transfemoral amputation (TFA).
METHODS METHODS
A systematic review and narrative synthesis was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Resources, including observational studies, nonobservational scientific papers, conference proceedings, and textbooks, detailing techniques of TFA distal muscle stabilization were identified from standard medical repositories and library search. A supplementary search of YouTube and Google was undertaken to identify additional resources. Quality assessment was undertaken using Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies-of Interventions; Authority, Accuracy, Coverage, Objectivity, Date, Significance; and modified-Discern tools.
RESULTS RESULTS
Forty seven resources were identified, including 17 journal articles, 17 textbooks, 5 educational websites/eBooks, 5 videos, 2 online presentations, and 1 webpage. Thirty seven described myodesis, 11 described myoplasty, and 6 described closure without distal muscle stabilization. Eight observational studies presented outcome data for 302 TFAs. No studies comparing closure with or without distal muscle stabilization were identified. All papers describing myodesis secured the adductors to the femur, and most also secured the quadriceps and/or hamstrings to this complex. Number of femoral drill holes varied from 1 to 6. Early wound complications occurred in 17% of amputations, whereas myodesis failure occurred in 9.5%. Prosthetic fitting rates were 73% and, where reported, 100% of patients maintained neutral femoral alignment.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Distal muscle stabilization, particularly myodesis, is a commonly described technique for TFA, although operative techniques are heterogenous. There is a paucity of outcome data, and no studies comparing it to closures without distal muscle stabilization. However, these low-quality data suggest wound healing rates are equivalent to TFA without distal muscle stabilization while demonstrating improvement to patients' rehabilitation potential.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37802139
pii: S0890-5096(23)00656-8
doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.07.105
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

182-193

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Ismay Fabre (I)

Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, UK. Electronic address: Ismay.Fabre3@wales.nhs.uk.

Dominic Thompson (D)

Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK.

Brenig Gwilym (B)

Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK.

Keith Jones (K)

Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, UK.

Michael Pinzur (M)

Loyola University Hospital, Maywood, IL.

Jan H B Geertzen (JHB)

University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Christopher Twine (C)

Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.

David Bosanquet (D)

Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, UK.

Classifications MeSH