Development of engineered Candida tropicalis strain for efficient corncob-based xylitol-ethanol biorefinery.


Journal

Microbial cell factories
ISSN: 1475-2859
Titre abrégé: Microb Cell Fact
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101139812

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 02 08 2023
accepted: 30 08 2023
medline: 1 11 2023
pubmed: 7 10 2023
entrez: 6 10 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Xylitol has a wide range of applications in the pharmaceuticals, cosmetic, food and beverage industry. Microbial xylitol production reduces the risk of contamination and is considered as environment friendly and sustainable compared to the chemical method. In this study, random mutagenesis and genetic engineering approaches were employed to develop Candida tropicalis strains with reduced xylitol dehydrogenase (XDH) activity to eliminate co-substrate requirement for corn cob-based xylitol-ethanol biorefinery. The results suggest that when pure xylose (10% w/v) was fermented in bioreactor, the Ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS) mutated strain (C. tropicalis K2M) showed 9.2% and XYL2 heterozygous (XYL2/xyl2Δ::FRT) strain (C. tropicalis K21D) showed 16% improvement in xylitol production compared to parental strain (C. tropicalis K2). Furthermore, 1.5-fold improvement (88.62 g/L to 132 g/L) in xylitol production was achieved by C. tropicalis K21D after Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and one factor at a time (OFAT) applied for media component optimization. Finally, corncob hydrolysate was tested for xylitol production in biorefinery mode, which leads to the production of 32.6 g/L xylitol from hemicellulosic fraction, 32.0 g/L ethanol from cellulosic fraction and 13.0 g/L animal feed. This work, for the first time, illustrates the potential of C. tropicalis K21D as a microbial cell factory for efficient production of xylitol and ethanol via an integrated biorefinery framework by utilising lignocellulosic biomass with minimum waste generation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Xylitol has a wide range of applications in the pharmaceuticals, cosmetic, food and beverage industry. Microbial xylitol production reduces the risk of contamination and is considered as environment friendly and sustainable compared to the chemical method. In this study, random mutagenesis and genetic engineering approaches were employed to develop Candida tropicalis strains with reduced xylitol dehydrogenase (XDH) activity to eliminate co-substrate requirement for corn cob-based xylitol-ethanol biorefinery.
RESULTS RESULTS
The results suggest that when pure xylose (10% w/v) was fermented in bioreactor, the Ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS) mutated strain (C. tropicalis K2M) showed 9.2% and XYL2 heterozygous (XYL2/xyl2Δ::FRT) strain (C. tropicalis K21D) showed 16% improvement in xylitol production compared to parental strain (C. tropicalis K2). Furthermore, 1.5-fold improvement (88.62 g/L to 132 g/L) in xylitol production was achieved by C. tropicalis K21D after Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and one factor at a time (OFAT) applied for media component optimization. Finally, corncob hydrolysate was tested for xylitol production in biorefinery mode, which leads to the production of 32.6 g/L xylitol from hemicellulosic fraction, 32.0 g/L ethanol from cellulosic fraction and 13.0 g/L animal feed.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This work, for the first time, illustrates the potential of C. tropicalis K21D as a microbial cell factory for efficient production of xylitol and ethanol via an integrated biorefinery framework by utilising lignocellulosic biomass with minimum waste generation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37803395
doi: 10.1186/s12934-023-02190-3
pii: 10.1186/s12934-023-02190-3
pmc: PMC10557352
doi:

Substances chimiques

Xylitol VCQ006KQ1E
Ethanol 3K9958V90M
Xylose A1TA934AKO

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

201

Subventions

Organisme : Science and Engineering Research Board
ID : PDF/2020/002290
Organisme : Indian Council of Medical Research
ID : Myco/Fell/3/2022 ECD-II
Organisme : DBT-Pan IIT Centre for Bioenergy
ID : BT/PB/Centre/03/ICGEB/2011 Phase II

Informations de copyright

© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Références

AMB Express. 2020 Apr 20;10(1):78
pubmed: 32314068
Microb Cell Fact. 2020 Jun 3;19(1):121
pubmed: 32493445
Front Microbiol. 2019 Mar 19;10:357
pubmed: 30941104
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2011 Jul;53(1):106-13
pubmed: 21554342
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2019 Jan 28;12:20
pubmed: 30705706
Bioresour Technol. 2011 Feb;102(3):3322-9
pubmed: 21095119
Bioresour Technol. 2019 Nov;291:121931
pubmed: 31382093
Microb Cell Fact. 2021 May 25;20(1):105
pubmed: 34034730
Bioresour Technol. 2022 May;351:127067
pubmed: 35351564
N Biotechnol. 2011 Oct;28(6):673-8
pubmed: 20466087
Environ Technol. 2022 Jul 6;:1-15
pubmed: 35762251
Bioresour Technol. 2020 Aug;310:123427
pubmed: 32353769
Bioresour Technol. 2021 Dec;342:126005
pubmed: 34592613
Gene. 2004 Oct 27;341:119-27
pubmed: 15474295
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Oct 21;10:1029203
pubmed: 36338133
Biotechnol Lett. 2011 Jun;33(6):1209-13
pubmed: 21331586
Bioresour Technol. 2021 Jan;320(Pt B):124422
pubmed: 33242688
Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2015 Aug;176(7):1975-84
pubmed: 26043853
3 Biotech. 2016 Jun;6(1):75
pubmed: 28330145
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2019 Feb 27;12:40
pubmed: 30858877
Bioresour Technol. 2016 Aug;214:363-370
pubmed: 27155264
Microbiol Res. 2017 Apr;197:9-21
pubmed: 28219529
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2020 Dec 29;13(1):209
pubmed: 33375948
Bioresour Technol. 2022 May;351:126903
pubmed: 35227916
Bioresour Technol. 2016 Aug;213:299-310
pubmed: 27142629
Metab Eng. 2013 Jan;15:226-34
pubmed: 23103205
J Microbiol. 2006 Feb;44(1):113-20
pubmed: 16554726
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Jun;72(6):4207-13
pubmed: 16751533
Anal Chim Acta. 2007 Aug 6;597(2):179-86
pubmed: 17683728
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2012 Jan;35(1-2):199-204
pubmed: 21969058
Biotechnol Lett. 2006 Aug;28(15):1159-62
pubmed: 16810450
Bioresour Technol. 2012 Feb;105:134-41
pubmed: 22196071
Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2008 Apr;Chapter 13:Unit 13.3B
pubmed: 18425760
3 Biotech. 2016 Dec;6(2):127
pubmed: 28330197

Auteurs

Anup Kumar Singh (AK)

Yeast Biofuel Group, DBT-ICGEB Centre for Advanced Bioenergy Research, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India.

Farha Deeba (F)

Yeast Biofuel Group, DBT-ICGEB Centre for Advanced Bioenergy Research, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India.

Mohit Kumar (M)

Yeast Biofuel Group, DBT-ICGEB Centre for Advanced Bioenergy Research, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India.

Sonam Kumari (S)

Yeast Biofuel Group, DBT-ICGEB Centre for Advanced Bioenergy Research, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India.
ICMR-National Institute of Pathology, New Delhi, 110029, India.

Shahid Ali Wani (SA)

Yeast Biofuel Group, DBT-ICGEB Centre for Advanced Bioenergy Research, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India.

Tanushree Paul (T)

Yeast Biofuel Group, DBT-ICGEB Centre for Advanced Bioenergy Research, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India.

Naseem A Gaur (NA)

Yeast Biofuel Group, DBT-ICGEB Centre for Advanced Bioenergy Research, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India. naseem@icgeb.res.in.

Articles similaires

Zea mays Triticum China Seasons Crops, Agricultural
Zea mays Ozone Mycotoxins Food Safety Food Contamination
Animals Rumen Methane Fermentation Cannabis

Classifications MeSH