Super-enhancer hijacking drives ectopic expression of hedgehog pathway ligands in meningiomas.
Journal
Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 10 2023
07 10 2023
Historique:
received:
11
08
2022
accepted:
25
09
2023
medline:
1
11
2023
pubmed:
8
10
2023
entrez:
7
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Hedgehog signaling mediates embryologic development of the central nervous system and other tissues and is frequently hijacked by neoplasia to facilitate uncontrolled cellular proliferation. Meningiomas, the most common primary brain tumor, exhibit Hedgehog signaling activation in 6.5% of cases, triggered by recurrent mutations in pathway mediators such as SMO. In this study, we find 35.6% of meningiomas that lack previously known drivers acquired various types of somatic structural variations affecting chromosomes 2q35 and 7q36.3. These cases exhibit ectopic expression of Hedgehog ligands, IHH and SHH, respectively, resulting in Hedgehog signaling activation. Recurrent tandem duplications involving IHH permit de novo chromatin interactions between super-enhancers within DIRC3 and a locus containing IHH. Our work expands the landscape of meningioma molecular drivers and demonstrates enhancer hijacking of Hedgehog ligands as a route to activate this pathway in neoplasia.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37805627
doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41926-y
pii: 10.1038/s41467-023-41926-y
pmc: PMC10560290
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hedgehog Proteins
0
Ligands
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6279Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P50 CA221747
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA060553
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS120547
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : F30 CA183530
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : F30 CA213666
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM007205
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Goutagny, S. et al. High incidence of activating TERT promoter mutations in meningiomas undergoing malignant progression. Brain Pathol. 24, 184–189 (2014).
pubmed: 24261697
doi: 10.1111/bpa.12110
Nassiri, F. et al. A clinically applicable integrative molecular classification of meningiomas. Nature 597, 119–125 (2021).
pubmed: 34433969
doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03850-3
Youngblood, M. W. et al. Associations of meningioma molecular subgroup and tumor recurrence. Neuro Oncol. 23, 783–794 (2021).
pubmed: 33068421
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa226
Choudhury, A. et al. Meningioma DNA methylation groups identify biological drivers and therapeutic vulnerabilities. Nat. Genet. 54, 649–659 (2022).
pubmed: 35534562
pmcid: 9374001
doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01061-8
Sahm, F. et al. DNA methylation-based classification and grading system for meningioma: a multicentre, retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol. 18, 682–694 (2017).
pubmed: 28314689
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30155-9
Brastianos, P. K. et al. Advances in multidisciplinary therapy for meningiomas. Neuro Oncol. 21, i18–i31 (2019).
pubmed: 30649489
pmcid: 6347080
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noy136
Wen, P. Y., Quant, E., Drappatz, J., Beroukhim, R. & Norden, A. D. Medical therapies for meningiomas. J. Neuro-Oncol. 99, 365–378 (2010).
doi: 10.1007/s11060-010-0349-8
Rouleau, G. A. et al. Genetic linkage of bilateral acoustic neurofibromatosis to a DNA marker on chromosome 22. Nature 329, 246 (1987).
pubmed: 2888021
doi: 10.1038/329246a0
Ruttledge, M. H. et al. Evidence for the complete inactivation of the NF2 gene in the majority of sporadic meningiomas. Nat. Genet. 6, 180 (1994).
pubmed: 8162072
doi: 10.1038/ng0294-180
Schmitz, U. et al. INI1 mutations in meningiomas at a potential hotspot in exon 9. Br. J. cancer 84, 199–201 (2001).
pubmed: 11161377
pmcid: 2363707
doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1583
Clark, V. E. et al. Genomic analysis of non-NF2 meningiomas reveals mutations in TRAF7, KLF4, AKT1, and SMO. Science 339, 1077–1080 (2013).
pubmed: 23348505
pmcid: 4808587
doi: 10.1126/science.1233009
Brastianos, P. K. et al. Genomic sequencing of meningiomas identifies oncogenic SMO and AKT1 mutations. Nat. Genet. 45, 285–289 (2013).
pubmed: 23334667
pmcid: 3739288
doi: 10.1038/ng.2526
Abedalthagafi, M. et al. Oncogenic PI3K mutations are as common as AKT1 and SMO mutations in meningioma. Neuro Oncol. 18, 649–655 (2016).
pubmed: 26826201
pmcid: 4827048
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov316
Clark, V. E. et al. Recurrent somatic mutations in POLR2A define a distinct subset of meningiomas. Nat. Genet. 48, 1253–1259 (2016).
pubmed: 27548314
pmcid: 5114141
doi: 10.1038/ng.3651
Jiang, J. & Hui, C.-C. Hedgehog signaling in development and cancer. Dev. Cell 15, 801–812 (2008).
pubmed: 19081070
pmcid: 6443374
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.11.010
Klopocki, E. et al. Copy-number variations involving the IHH locus are associated with syndactyly and craniosynostosis. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 88, 70–75 (2011).
pubmed: 21167467
pmcid: 3014361
doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.11.006
Gao, B. et al. Mutations in IHH, encoding Indian hedgehog, cause brachydactyly type A-1. Nat. Genet. 28, 386–388 (2001).
pubmed: 11455389
doi: 10.1038/ng577
Lupiáñez, D. G. et al. Disruptions of topological chromatin domains cause pathogenic rewiring of gene-enhancer interactions. Cell 161, 1012–1025 (2015).
pubmed: 25959774
pmcid: 4791538
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.004
Yuksel-Apak, M. et al. A large duplication involving the IHH locus mimics acrocallosal syndrome. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 20, 639–644 (2012).
pubmed: 22234151
pmcid: 3355252
doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.250
Berman, D. M. et al. Widespread requirement for Hedgehog ligand stimulation in growth of digestive tract tumours. Nature 425, 846–851 (2003).
pubmed: 14520411
doi: 10.1038/nature01972
Karhadkar, S. S. et al. Hedgehog signalling in prostate regeneration, neoplasia and metastasis. Nature 431, 707–712 (2004).
pubmed: 15361885
doi: 10.1038/nature02962
Qualtrough, D., Buda, A., Gaffield, W., Williams, A. C. & Paraskeva, C. Hedgehog signalling in colorectal tumour cells: induction of apoptosis with cyclopamine treatment. Int. J. Cancer 110, 831–837 (2004).
pubmed: 15170664
doi: 10.1002/ijc.20227
Boetto, J. et al. GAB1 overexpression identifies hedgehog-activated anterior skull base meningiomas. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 47, 748–755 (2021).
pubmed: 34056767
doi: 10.1111/nan.12740
Abedalthagafi, M. S. et al. Angiomatous meningiomas have a distinct genetic profile with multiple chromosomal polysomies including polysomy of chromosome 5. Oncotarget 5, 10596 (2014).
pubmed: 25347344
pmcid: 4279396
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2517
Kuroi, Y. et al. Identification of shared genomic aberrations between angiomatous and microcystic meningiomas. Neurooncol. Adv. 1, vdz028 (2019).
pubmed: 32642661
pmcid: 7212863
Ahrendsen, J. T., Hsu, N., Wolf, Z., Bryke, C. & Varma, H. Multiple whole chromosomal gains define angiomatous meningiomas and are absent from the tumor vasculature. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 79, 618–625 (2020).
pubmed: 32357369
doi: 10.1093/jnen/nlaa031
Williams, E. A. et al. Frequent inactivating mutations of the PBAF complex gene PBRM1 in meningioma with papillary features. Acta Neuropathol. 140, 89–93 (2020).
pubmed: 32405805
doi: 10.1007/s00401-020-02161-7
Shankar, G. M. et al. Germline and somatic BAP1 mutations in high-grade rhabdoid meningiomas. Neuro Oncol. 19, 535–545 (2017).
pubmed: 28170043
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox094
Lettice, L. A. et al. A long-range Shh enhancer regulates expression in the developing limb and fin and is associated with preaxial polydactyly. Hum. Mol. Genet. 12, 1725–1735 (2003).
pubmed: 12837695
doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddg180
Singh, R., Dhanyamraju, P. K. & Lauth, M. DYRK1B blocks canonical and promotes non-canonical Hedgehog signaling through activation of the mTOR/AKT pathway. Oncotarget 8, 833–845 (2017).
pubmed: 27903983
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13662
Lauth, M. et al. DYRK1B-dependent autocrine-to-paracrine shift of Hedgehog signaling by mutant RAS. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 718–725 (2010).
pubmed: 20512148
doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1833
Thway, K. & Fisher, C. Tumors with EWSR1-CREB1 and EWSR1-ATF1 fusions: the current status. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 36, e1–e11 (2012).
pubmed: 22510762
doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31825485c5
Stephens, M. False discovery rates: a new deal. Biostatistics 18, 275–294 (2017).
pubmed: 27756721
Katoh, Y. & Katoh, M. Hedgehog target genes: mechanisms of carcinogenesis induced by aberrant hedgehog signaling activation. Curr. Mol. Med. 9, 873–886 (2009).
pubmed: 19860666
doi: 10.2174/156652409789105570
Ellison, D. W. et al. Medulloblastoma: clinicopathological correlates of SHH, WNT, and non-SHH/WNT molecular subgroups. Acta Neuropathol. 121, 381–396 (2011).
pubmed: 21267586
pmcid: 3519926
doi: 10.1007/s00401-011-0800-8
Wu, W. et al. Clinical Significance of Somatostatin Receptor (SSTR) 2 in Meningioma. Front. Oncol. 10, 1633 (2020).
pubmed: 33014821
pmcid: 7494964
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01633
Bhattacharyya, S., Chandra, V., Vijayanand, P. & Ay, F. Identification of significant chromatin contacts from HiChIP data by FitHiChIP. Nat. Commun. 10, 4221 (2019).
pubmed: 31530818
pmcid: 6748947
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11950-y
Cresswell, K. G., Stansfield, J. C. & Dozmorov, M. G. SpectralTAD: an R package for defining a hierarchy of topologically associated domains using spectral clustering. BMC Bioinform. 21, 319 (2020).
doi: 10.1186/s12859-020-03652-w
Weischenfeldt, J. et al. Pan-cancer analysis of somatic copy-number alterations implicates IRS4 and IGF2 in enhancer hijacking. Nat. Genet. 49, 65–74 (2017).
pubmed: 27869826
doi: 10.1038/ng.3722
Hnisz, D. et al. Activation of proto-oncogenes by disruption of chromosome neighborhoods. Science 351, 1454–1458 (2016).
pubmed: 26940867
pmcid: 4884612
doi: 10.1126/science.aad9024
Vasudevan, H. N. et al. Intratumor and informatic heterogeneity influence meningioma molecular classification. Acta Neuropathologica 144, 579–583 (2022).
pubmed: 35759011
pmcid: 9618384
doi: 10.1007/s00401-022-02455-y
Will, A. J. et al. Composition and dosage of a multipartite enhancer cluster control developmental expression of Ihh (Indian hedgehog). Nat. Genet. 49, 1539–1545 (2017).
pubmed: 28846100
pmcid: 5617800
doi: 10.1038/ng.3939
Helmsauer, K. et al. Enhancer hijacking determines extrachromosomal circular MYCN amplicon architecture in neuroblastoma. Nat. Commun. 11, 5823 (2020).
pubmed: 33199677
pmcid: 7669906
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19452-y
Morton, A. R. et al. Functional enhancers shape extrachromosomal oncogene amplifications. Cell 179, 1330–1341.e13 (2019).
pubmed: 31761532
pmcid: 7241652
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.10.039
Youngblood, M. W. et al. Correlations between genomic subgroup and clinical features in a cohort of more than 3000 meningiomas. J. Neurosurg. JNS 133, 1345–1354 (2020).
doi: 10.3171/2019.8.JNS191266
Ruiz, I., Altaba, A., Palma, V. & Dahmane, N. Hedgehog-Gli signalling and the growth of the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3, 24–33 (2002).
doi: 10.1038/nrn704
Nie, X., Luukko, K., Kvinnsland, I. H. & Kettunen, P. Developmentally regulated expression of Shh and Ihh in the developing mouse cranial base: comparison with Sox9 expression. Anat. Rec. A: Discov. Mol. Cell Evol. Biol. 286, 891–898 (2005).
pubmed: 16145660
doi: 10.1002/ar.a.20231
Boetto, J., Apra, C., Bielle, F., Peyre, M. & Kalamarides, M. Selective vulnerability of the primitive meningeal layer to prenatal Smo activation for skull base meningothelial meningioma formation. Oncogene 37, 4955–4963 (2018).
pubmed: 29789719
doi: 10.1038/s41388-018-0328-7
Boetto, J., Bielle, F., Sanson, M., Peyre, M. & Kalamarides, M. SMO mutation status defines a distinct and frequent molecular subgroup in olfactory groove meningiomas. Neuro Oncol. 19, 345–351 (2017).
pubmed: 28082415
pmcid: 5464306
Fontebasso, A. M., Liu, X. Y., Sturm, D. & Jabado, N. Chromatin remodeling defects in pediatric and young adult glioblastoma: a tale of a variant histone 3 tail. Brain Pathol. 23, 210–216 (2013).
pubmed: 23432647
pmcid: 8029102
doi: 10.1111/bpa.12023
Sweeney, R. T. et al. Identification of recurrent SMO and BRAF mutations in ameloblastomas. Nat. Genet. 46, 722–725 (2014).
pubmed: 24859340
pmcid: 4418232
doi: 10.1038/ng.2986
Monje, M. et al. Hedgehog-responsive candidate cell of origin for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 4453–4458 (2011).
pubmed: 21368213
pmcid: 3060250
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1101657108
Preusser, M., Brastianos, P. K. & Mawrin, C. Advances in meningioma genetics: novel therapeutic opportunities. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 14, 106 (2018).
pubmed: 29302064
doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2017.168
Bayley, J. C. T. et al. Multiple approaches converge on three biological subtypes of meningioma and extract new insights from published studies. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm6247 (2022).
pubmed: 35108039
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abm6247
Driver, J. et al. A molecularly integrated grade for meningioma. Neuro Oncol. 24, 796–808 (2022).
pubmed: 34508644
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab213
Dong, X., Wang, C., Chen, Z. & Zhao, W. Overcoming the resistance mechanisms of smoothened inhibitors. Drug Discov. Today 23, 704–710 (2018).
pubmed: 29326074
doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.01.012
Harmanci, A. S. et al. Integrated genomic analyses of de novo pathways underlying atypical meningiomas. Nat. Commun. 8, 14433 (2017).
pubmed: 28195122
pmcid: 5316884
doi: 10.1038/ncomms14433
Li, H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. Preprint at arXiv:1303.3997 (2013).
Picard Toolkit. in GitHub Repository (Broad Institute, 2019). https://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/ .
McKenna, A. et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303 (2010).
pubmed: 20644199
pmcid: 2928508
doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110
Li, H. et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).
pubmed: 19505943
pmcid: 2723002
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
Sathirapongsasuti, J. F. et al. Exome sequencing-based copy-number variation and loss of heterozygosity detection: ExomeCNV. Bioinformatics 27, 2648–2654 (2011).
pubmed: 21828086
pmcid: 3179661
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr462
Li, H. Toward better understanding of artifacts in variant calling from high-coverage samples. Bioinformatics 30, 2843–2851 (2014).
pubmed: 24974202
pmcid: 4271055
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu356
Canisius, S., Martens, J. W. & Wessels, L. F. A novel independence test for somatic alterations in cancer shows that biology drives mutual exclusivity but chance explains most co-occurrence. Genome Biol. 17, 261 (2016).
pubmed: 27986087
pmcid: 5162102
doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1114-x
McLaren, W. et al. The ensembl variant effect predictor. Genome Biol. 17, 122 (2016).
pubmed: 27268795
pmcid: 4893825
doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-0974-4
Rentzsch, P., Witten, D., Cooper, G. M., Shendure, J. & Kircher, M. CADD: predicting the deleteriousness of variants throughout the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D886–d894 (2019).
pubmed: 30371827
doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1016
Lek, M. et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature 536, 285 (2016).
pubmed: 27535533
pmcid: 5018207
doi: 10.1038/nature19057
Smith, M. J. et al. Loss-of-function mutations in SMARCE1 cause an inherited disorder of multiple spinal meningiomas. Nat. Genet. 45, 295–298 (2013).
pubmed: 23377182
doi: 10.1038/ng.2552
Ruttledge, M. H. et al. Evidence for the complete inactivation of the NF2 gene in the majority of sporadic meningiomas. Nat. Genet. 6, 180–184 (1994).
pubmed: 8162072
doi: 10.1038/ng0294-180
Whiffin, N. et al. Using high-resolution variant frequencies to empower clinical genome interpretation. Genet. Med. 19, 1151–1158 (2017).
pubmed: 28518168
pmcid: 5563454
doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.26
Chen, X. et al. Manta: rapid detection of structural variants and indels for germline and cancer sequencing applications. Bioinformatics 32, 1220–1222 (2016).
pubmed: 26647377
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv710
Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet. J. 17, 10–12 (2011).
doi: 10.14806/ej.17.1.200
Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).
pubmed: 23104886
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635
Bray, N. L., Pimentel, H., Melsted, P. & Pachter, L. Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 525 (2016).
pubmed: 27043002
doi: 10.1038/nbt.3519
Soneson, C., Love, M. I. & Robinson, M. D. Differential analyses for RNA-seq: transcript-level estimates improve gene-level inferences. F1000Res 4, 1521 (2015).
pubmed: 26925227
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.7563.1
Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).
pubmed: 25516281
pmcid: 4302049
doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
Ng, A., Jordan, M. & Weiss, Y. On spectral clustering: Analysis and an algorithm. Adv. Neural Inform. Process. Syst. 14 (2001).
Zhu, A., Ibrahim, J. G. & Love, M. I. Heavy-tailed prior distributions for sequence count data: removing the noise and preserving large differences. Bioinformatics 35, 2084–2092 (2019).
pubmed: 30395178
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty895
Langfelder, P. & Horvath, S. Fast R functions for robust correlations and hierarchical clustering. J. Stat. Softw. 46, 1–17 (2012).
doi: 10.18637/jss.v046.i11
Zhang, J. & Huang, K. Normalized lmQCM: an algorithm for detecting weak quasi-cliques in weighted graph with applications in gene co-expression module discovery in cancers. Cancer Inf. 13, 137–146 (2014).
Langfelder, P. & Horvath, S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinform. 9, 559 (2008).
doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-559
Holm, S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 6, 65–70 (1979).
Wu, T. et al. clusterProfiler 4.0: A universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innovation (Camb.) 2, 100141 (2021).
pubmed: 34557778
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357 (2012).
pubmed: 22388286
pmcid: 3322381
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923
Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008).
pubmed: 18798982
pmcid: 2592715
doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137
Whyte, W. A. et al. Master transcription factors and mediator establish super-enhancers at key cell identity genes. Cell 153, 307–319 (2013).
pubmed: 23582322
pmcid: 3653129
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.035
Lovén, J. et al. Selective inhibition of tumor oncogenes by disruption of super-enhancers. Cell 153, 320–334 (2013).
pubmed: 23582323
pmcid: 3760967
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.036
Ramírez, F. et al. deepTools2: a next generation web server for deep-sequencing data analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W160–W165 (2016).
pubmed: 27079975
pmcid: 4987876
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw257
Mumbach, M. R. et al. HiChIP: efficient and sensitive analysis of protein-directed genome architecture. Nat. Methods 13, 919 (2016).
pubmed: 27643841
pmcid: 5501173
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3999
Servant, N. et al. HiC-Pro: an optimized and flexible pipeline for Hi-C data processing. Genome Biol. 16, 259 (2015).
pubmed: 26619908
pmcid: 4665391
doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0831-x
van der Weide, R. H. et al. Hi-C analyses with GENOVA: a case study with cohesin variants. NAR Genom. Bioinform 3, lqab040 (2021).
pubmed: 34046591
pmcid: 8140737
doi: 10.1093/nargab/lqab040