Predictors of new onset atrial fibrillation burden in the critically ill.
Journal
Cardiology
ISSN: 1421-9751
Titre abrégé: Cardiology
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 1266406
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Oct 2023
07 Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
04
05
2023
accepted:
25
09
2023
medline:
9
10
2023
pubmed:
9
10
2023
entrez:
8
10
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting, and has been associated with adverse outcomes. In this context, there is increasing research interest in AF burden as a predictor of subsequent adverse events. However, the pathophysiology and drivers of AF burden in ICU are poorly understood. This study sought to evaluate the predictors of AF burden in critical illness associated new onset AF (CI-NOAF). Methods Out of 7,030 admissions a tertiary general intensive care unit between December 2015 and September 2018, 309 patients developed CI-NOAF. AF burden was defined as the percentage of monitored time in AF, as extracted from hourly interpretations of continuous ECG monitoring. Low and high AF burden groups were defined relative to the median AF burden. Clinical, laboratory and echocardiographic parameters were extracted, and multivariable modelling with binary logistic regression was performed to evaluate for independent associations with AF burden. Results The median AF burden was 7.0%. Factors associated with increased AF burden were age, dyslipidaemia, chronic kidney disease, increased creatinine, CHA2DS2-VASc score, ICU admission diagnosis category, amiodarone administration and left atrial area (LAA). Factors associated with lower AF burden were previous alcohol excess, burden of ventilation, the use of inotropes/vasopressors and beta blockers. On multivariate analysis, increased LAA, chronic kidney disease and amiodarone use were independently associated with increased AF burden, whereas beta blocker use was associated with lower AF burden. Conclusion Left atrial size and chronic cardiovascular comorbidities appear to be the primary drivers of CI-NOAF burden, whereas factors related to acute illness and critical care intervention paradoxically did not appear to be a substantial driver of arrhythmia burden. Further research is needed regarding drivers of AF and the efficacy of rhythm control intervention in this unique setting.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37806306
pii: 000534368
doi: 10.1159/000534368
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.