Skin tears in mammography: A narrative review.

Mammography Management Prevention Skin tears Tissue viability

Journal

Journal of tissue viability
ISSN: 0965-206X
Titre abrégé: J Tissue Viability
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9306822

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 13 06 2023
revised: 19 09 2023
accepted: 24 09 2023
pubmed: 9 10 2023
medline: 9 10 2023
entrez: 8 10 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Skin tears are classed as traumatic wounds mainly caused by shearing and frictional forces. Incidences of skin tears are noted to be significant mostly in the elderly population and those with fragile and vulnerable skin. Individuals undergoing mammography are susceptible to skin tears due to factors associated with skin breakdown such as thinning of the epidermis, use of steroids, presence of moisture, but this, when compounded with the procedure of mammography can increase the risk further. Mammography, an x-ray imaging method, which exerts adequate compression force on the breast tissue for the mammographer to obtain a high-quality image for diagnostic purposes. However, when compression force is applied during mammography resulting incidences of cutaneous skin tears can occur. Lack of and under reporting of skin tears during mammography makes it difficult to ascertain the extent of this problem and scale of its incidence. Therefore, the purpose of this narrative review is to focus on providing an overview of skin tears associated with mammography and a discussion of the current literature with regards to its incidence and diagnosis. In addition, the review will also discuss the theoretical and contextual perspective of the prevention and management strategies associated with skin tears.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37806846
pii: S0965-206X(23)00102-X
doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2023.09.003
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

577-584

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest None.

Auteurs

Melanie Stephens (M)

School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Fredrick Road Campus, Manchester, M5 4WT, UK. Electronic address: m.stephens@salford.ac.uk.

Sheba Pradeep (S)

School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Fredrick Road Campus, Manchester, M5 4WT, UK. Electronic address: S.Pradeep@salford.ac.uk.

Adeela Khan (A)

School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Fredrick Road Campus, Manchester, M5 4WT, UK. Electronic address: A.Khan213@salford.ac.uk.

Matthew Wynn (M)

School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Fredrick Road Campus, Manchester, M5 4WT, UK. Electronic address: M.O.Wynn@salford.ac.uk.

Katy Szczepura (K)

School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Fredrick Road Campus, Manchester, M5 4WT, UK. Electronic address: K.Szczepura@salford.ac.uk.

Claire Mercer (C)

School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Fredrick Road Campus, Manchester, M5 4WT, UK. Electronic address: c.e.mercer@salford.ac.uk.

Classifications MeSH