Self-efficacy for writing and written text quality of upper secondary students with and without reading difficulties.

L1/L2 argumentative writing poor reading comprehension poor word recognition reading difficulties self-efficacy for writing upper secondary school written text quality

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 30 05 2023
accepted: 07 08 2023
medline: 9 10 2023
pubmed: 9 10 2023
entrez: 9 10 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Self-efficacy for writing (SEW) and reading ability are some of several factors that may be related to the quality of written text that students produce. The aim of the current study was (1) to explore the variation in SEW and written text quality in L1-Swedish and L2-English among upper secondary students with different reading profiles in L1 (typical reading vs. reading difficulties) and with different study backgrounds (SB1year or SB2years = one or two years of studies of Swedish and English, respectively), and in the next step (2) to explore if individual variations in L1-reading and SEW may explain variation in written text quality. Participants were 100 upper secondary students (aged 17-18) with different reading profiles operationalized as typical reading and reading difficulties. Data consisted of screening for word recognition and reading comprehension, text quality results from argumentative L1- and L2-writing tasks, school information on study background in Swedish/English, and students' responses from an online survey about SEW. As to SEW results, an ANOVA revealed significant main effects for reading profile and study background in L1, but in L2 there was only a significant main effect for reading profile. Written text quality results indicated that there was a significant interaction effect between reading profile and study background in L1, indicating that the significant main effect for reading profile on written text quality was influenced by the group of students with reading difficulties and SB1year. There was a significant main effect for reading profile and study background on written text quality in L2. Students with reading difficulties and SB1year were the most vulnerable group, and they had the lowest scores in L1/L2 SEW and written text quality in L1 and L2. Multiple regression results indicated that word recognition and SEW contributed significantly to L1-text quality, and word recognition, reading comprehension, and SEW contributed significantly to L2-text quality. Thus, this study sheds light on the under-researched area of L1/L2 SEW and text quality of students with reading difficulties at the level of upper secondary school. Pedagogical implications are discussed and highlight the need for writing instruction across subjects in upper secondary school and for extra writing support/scaffolding for students with reading difficulties and shorter study background in the language subjects L1 (Swedish) and L2 (English).

Identifiants

pubmed: 37809318
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1231817
pmc: PMC10557487
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1231817

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Sehlström, Waldmann and Levlin.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Apr-May;51-52:145-52
pubmed: 26826466
Br J Psychol. 2003 May;94(Pt 2):143-74
pubmed: 12803812
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018 Oct 24;49(4):843-863
pubmed: 30458545
J Sch Psychol. 2008 Feb;46(1):1-21
pubmed: 18438452
J Adolesc. 2009 Aug;32(4):797-817
pubmed: 19027942
Psychol Bull. 2012 Mar;138(2):322-52
pubmed: 22250824
J Learn Disabil. 2013 Jan-Feb;46(1):87-96
pubmed: 21940461
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 17;14:1149923
pubmed: 37138979
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2021 Apr;46(1):1-10
pubmed: 31910683
Br J Educ Psychol. 2020 Sep;90(3):580-603
pubmed: 31513289
J Learn Disabil. 2020 May/Jun;53(3):189-198
pubmed: 31941395
Except Child. 1989 Nov;56(3):201-14
pubmed: 2806360
Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000 Oct;25(4):406-422
pubmed: 11001784
Br J Dev Psychol. 2016 Nov;34(4):538-554
pubmed: 27226087
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 21;8:1406
pubmed: 28878707
J Learn Disabil. 2016 Jan-Feb;49(1):65-76
pubmed: 24710743
J Learn Disabil. 1989 Nov;22(9):590-2
pubmed: 2809413
J Learn Disabil. 1993 Apr;26(4):237-49
pubmed: 8515188
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 20;14:1091894
pubmed: 36891200
J Learn Disabil. 2020 Jan/Feb;53(1):36-47
pubmed: 31609165
J Learn Disabil. 2007 Nov-Dec;40(6):494-507
pubmed: 18064976

Auteurs

Pär Sehlström (P)

Department of Language Studies, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Christian Waldmann (C)

Department of Swedish, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.

Maria Levlin (M)

Department of Language Studies, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Classifications MeSH