Real-World Survival and Treatment Regimens Across First- to Third-Line Treatment for Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
Triple-negative breast cancer
metastatic
survival
treatment
Journal
Breast cancer : basic and clinical research
ISSN: 1178-2234
Titre abrégé: Breast Cancer (Auckl)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101474356
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
07
03
2023
accepted:
31
08
2023
medline:
9
10
2023
pubmed:
9
10
2023
entrez:
9
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer with poor survival. Currently, the literature lacks comprehensive real-world evidence on locally recurrent and mTNBC patients. To validate the optimal treatment for patients with mTNBC, real-world evidence in combination with data from clinical trials must be evaluated as complementary. The objective of the study is to examine outcomes and treatment patterns of patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) utilizing real-world data of patients from all oncology sites across Denmark. This is a retrospective, non-interventional, multi-site, population-based observational study conducted across all oncology departments in Denmark. We included all women diagnosed with metastatic or locally recurrent TNBC from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019, using the national Danish Breast Cancer Group database. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in the first to third treatment line. The study included 243 women diagnosed with metastatic or recurrent TNBC. The median OS (mOS) was 11.6 months after the first line of treatment, 6.5 months after the second line, and 6.5 months after the third line. De novo mTNBC was associated with shorter OS (mOS: 8.3 vs 14.2 months), and those with a relapse within 18 months of primary diagnosis had shorter OS than those with a relapse after 18 months (mOS: 10.0 vs 18.2). In the first line, taxane was the preferred choice of treatment for patients with de novo mTNBC, whereas capecitabine was preferred for patients with recurrent TNBC. This real-world, nationwide study demonstrated poor OS among patients with metastatic or recurrent TNBC, with a mOS of 11.6 months (95% CI, 9.9-17.3). Patients who presented with de novo mTNBC or who had a relapse of their breast cancer within 18 months of primary diagnosis had shorter OS. The study was registered and approved by the Danish Capital Regions research overview (P-2021-605).
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) is an aggressive subtype of breast cancer with poor survival. Currently, the literature lacks comprehensive real-world evidence on locally recurrent and mTNBC patients. To validate the optimal treatment for patients with mTNBC, real-world evidence in combination with data from clinical trials must be evaluated as complementary.
Objectives
UNASSIGNED
The objective of the study is to examine outcomes and treatment patterns of patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) utilizing real-world data of patients from all oncology sites across Denmark.
Design
UNASSIGNED
This is a retrospective, non-interventional, multi-site, population-based observational study conducted across all oncology departments in Denmark.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
We included all women diagnosed with metastatic or locally recurrent TNBC from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019, using the national Danish Breast Cancer Group database. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in the first to third treatment line.
Results
UNASSIGNED
The study included 243 women diagnosed with metastatic or recurrent TNBC. The median OS (mOS) was 11.6 months after the first line of treatment, 6.5 months after the second line, and 6.5 months after the third line. De novo mTNBC was associated with shorter OS (mOS: 8.3 vs 14.2 months), and those with a relapse within 18 months of primary diagnosis had shorter OS than those with a relapse after 18 months (mOS: 10.0 vs 18.2). In the first line, taxane was the preferred choice of treatment for patients with de novo mTNBC, whereas capecitabine was preferred for patients with recurrent TNBC.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
This real-world, nationwide study demonstrated poor OS among patients with metastatic or recurrent TNBC, with a mOS of 11.6 months (95% CI, 9.9-17.3). Patients who presented with de novo mTNBC or who had a relapse of their breast cancer within 18 months of primary diagnosis had shorter OS.
Registration
UNASSIGNED
The study was registered and approved by the Danish Capital Regions research overview (P-2021-605).
Identifiants
pubmed: 37810797
doi: 10.1177/11782234231203292
pii: 10.1177_11782234231203292
pmc: PMC10552450
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
11782234231203292Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: TB: Institutional grants from Danish Cancer Society, Neye-fonden, Roche, Novartis, Samsung Bioepis, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Merck Eisai, and Venture Oncology Personal; Invited Speaker: Pfizer; and Advisory Board: Merck. MJ: Institutional grants from Samsung Bioepis, Nanostring Technologies, and Venture Oncology. AK: Institutional grants from Roche and Venture Oncology Personal and Advisory Board: Novartis, AstraZeneca, MDS, Roche, Pfizer, and Eli Lilly Danmark A/S. Other authors had no conflict of interest to declare.
Références
Hereditary Genet. 2013;2013(Suppl 2):
pubmed: 25285241
Future Oncol. 2021 Mar;17(8):931-941
pubmed: 33207944
Radiol Technol. 2017 May;88(5):519M-539M
pubmed: 28500107
In Vivo. 2018 Mar-Apr;32(2):353-358
pubmed: 29475920
Cancer Med. 2019 Apr;8(4):1882-1892
pubmed: 30761775
Breast. 2014 Feb;23(1):26-32
pubmed: 24215983
Breast Cancer Res. 2019 Dec 16;21(1):143
pubmed: 31842957
J Korean Med Sci. 2018 Jun 26;33(34):e213
pubmed: 30127705
Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1623-1649
pubmed: 32979513