IMRT in the treatment of locally advanced or inoperable NSCLC in the pre-durvalumab era: clinical outcomes and pattern of relapses, experience from the Oscar Lambret Center.
IMRT
NSCLC
isolated nodal failure
locally advanced or inoperable NSCLC
radiochemotherapy
radiotherapy
relapses
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
07
06
2023
accepted:
06
09
2023
medline:
9
10
2023
pubmed:
9
10
2023
entrez:
9
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Intensity-modulated conformal radiotherapy (IMRT) has become the technique of choice for the treatment of locally advanced or inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nevertheless, this technique presents dosimetric uncertainties, particularly in treating moving targets such as pulmonary neoplasms. Moreover, it theoretically increases the risk of isolated nodal failure (INF) due to reduced incidental irradiation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IMRT in patients with inoperable NSCLC and to describe the pattern of relapses. Patients with locally advanced NSCLC treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy between 2015 and 2018 at the Oscar Lambret Center were retrospectively included in the study. Overall and progression-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The cumulative incidence of the different components of relapse was estimated using the Kalbfleisch and Prentice method. Prognostic factors for relapse/death were investigated using the Cox model. A comparison with literature data was performed using a one-sample log-rank test. Seventy patients were included, and 65 patients (93%) had stage III disease. All the patients received chemotherapy, most frequently with cisplatin and navelbine. The dose received was 66 Gy administered in 33 fractions. The median follow-up and survival were 49.1 and 39.1 months, respectively. A total of 35 deaths and 43 relapses, including 29 with metastatic components, were reported. The overall survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 80.2% (95% confidence interval 68.3%-88.0%) and 67.2% (95% confidence interval 54.2%-77.3%), respectively. Locoregional relapse was observed in 14 patients, including two INF, one of which was located in the lymph node area adjacent to the clinical target volume. Median relapse-free survival was 15.2 months. No variable was statistically associated with the risk of relapse/death in multivariate analysis. Seven patients (10%) experienced grade 3 or higher toxicity. The use of IMRT for locally advanced or inoperable NSCLC led to favorable long-term clinical outcomes. The rate of locoregional relapse, particularly isolated lymph node failure, was low and comparable with that of the three-dimensional radiotherapy series, as was the rate of early and late toxicities.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Intensity-modulated conformal radiotherapy (IMRT) has become the technique of choice for the treatment of locally advanced or inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nevertheless, this technique presents dosimetric uncertainties, particularly in treating moving targets such as pulmonary neoplasms. Moreover, it theoretically increases the risk of isolated nodal failure (INF) due to reduced incidental irradiation.
Objective
UNASSIGNED
The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IMRT in patients with inoperable NSCLC and to describe the pattern of relapses.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Patients with locally advanced NSCLC treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapy between 2015 and 2018 at the Oscar Lambret Center were retrospectively included in the study. Overall and progression-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The cumulative incidence of the different components of relapse was estimated using the Kalbfleisch and Prentice method. Prognostic factors for relapse/death were investigated using the Cox model. A comparison with literature data was performed using a one-sample log-rank test.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Seventy patients were included, and 65 patients (93%) had stage III disease. All the patients received chemotherapy, most frequently with cisplatin and navelbine. The dose received was 66 Gy administered in 33 fractions. The median follow-up and survival were 49.1 and 39.1 months, respectively. A total of 35 deaths and 43 relapses, including 29 with metastatic components, were reported. The overall survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 80.2% (95% confidence interval 68.3%-88.0%) and 67.2% (95% confidence interval 54.2%-77.3%), respectively. Locoregional relapse was observed in 14 patients, including two INF, one of which was located in the lymph node area adjacent to the clinical target volume. Median relapse-free survival was 15.2 months. No variable was statistically associated with the risk of relapse/death in multivariate analysis. Seven patients (10%) experienced grade 3 or higher toxicity.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
The use of IMRT for locally advanced or inoperable NSCLC led to favorable long-term clinical outcomes. The rate of locoregional relapse, particularly isolated lymph node failure, was low and comparable with that of the three-dimensional radiotherapy series, as was the rate of early and late toxicities.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37810972
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1236361
pmc: PMC10554937
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1236361Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Le Roy, Wallet, Barthoulot, Leguillette, Lacornerie, Pasquier, Lartigau and Le Tinier.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Ann Oncol. 2013 Oct;24 Suppl 6:vi89-98
pubmed: 23860613
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2004 Jan;14(1):41-51
pubmed: 14752732
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 21;11(4):e0151988
pubmed: 27100968
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Sep 1;63(1):170-8
pubmed: 16111586
J Thorac Oncol. 2014 Dec;9(12):1788-95
pubmed: 25226428
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 May 1;68(1):94-102
pubmed: 17321067
Med Dosim. 2012 Winter;37(4):353-7
pubmed: 22459649
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Jul 15;62(4):988-94
pubmed: 15989999
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Mar 15;91(4):737-44
pubmed: 25752386
J Clin Oncol. 2017 May 1;35(13):1387-1394
pubmed: 28113017
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Mar 1;38(7):706-714
pubmed: 31841363
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Nov 20;39(33):3682-3692
pubmed: 34506246
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Feb;16(2):187-99
pubmed: 25601342
Radiother Oncol. 2018 Feb;126(2):291-299
pubmed: 29203290
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Jun 1;95(2):680-9
pubmed: 27055398
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Nov 15;84(4):1010-6
pubmed: 22920974
Radiother Oncol. 2012 Sep;104(3):343-8
pubmed: 22853852
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Nov;121(2):322-327
pubmed: 27884510
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2017 Apr;6(2):131-147
pubmed: 28529896
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Jul 1;80(3):893-9
pubmed: 21477946
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Apr 20;40(12):1301-1311
pubmed: 35108059
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Sep 1;66(1):126-34
pubmed: 16904518
Cancer Radiother. 2021 Dec;25(8):747-754
pubmed: 34183268
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Mar 1;67(3):735-41
pubmed: 17187941
Cancer Radiother. 2012 Oct;16(7):619-26
pubmed: 23089069
Oncologist. 2016 Dec;21(12):1530-1537
pubmed: 27628491
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jun 1;83(2):e251-6
pubmed: 22365622
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Feb;12(2):127-36
pubmed: 21236730
Radiat Oncol. 2020 Sep 16;15(1):218
pubmed: 32938468
Lung Cancer. 2010 Nov;70(2):218-20
pubmed: 20832897
Radiat Oncol. 2016 Sep 06;11(1):115
pubmed: 27600665
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 May 1;80(1):306-13
pubmed: 20888706
Radiother Oncol. 2010 May;95(2):178-84
pubmed: 20356642
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Mar 15;88(4):872-84
pubmed: 24495591
J Clin Oncol. 2010 May 1;28(13):2181-90
pubmed: 20351327
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan;35(1):56-62
pubmed: 28034064
Radiat Oncol. 2016 Sep 21;11(1):124
pubmed: 27655339
Lung Cancer. 2013 Nov;82(2):252-9
pubmed: 24018022