Scoring Methods in Script Concordance Tests: An Exploratory Psychometric Study.


Journal

The Journal of nursing education
ISSN: 1938-2421
Titre abrégé: J Nurs Educ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7705432

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Historique:
medline: 1 11 2023
pubmed: 10 10 2023
entrez: 9 10 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Despite the increasingly popular role of script concordance test (SCT) scoring methods in the evaluation of clinical reasoning, studies examining these methods in nursing are relatively scarce. This study explored the psychometric properties of five SCT scoring methods. An SCT was administered to 12 experts and 43 learners. Scores were calculated using five methods and descriptive statistics. Differences in scores were assessed with the Mann-Whitney U test, and Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated for the different methods. The median scores of both experts and learners differed substantially according to the scoring method used. Learners' scores were statistically different from experts' scores ( Further research is needed to refine the influence of SCT scoring methods for use in certifying assessment of clinical reasoning in nursing.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Despite the increasingly popular role of script concordance test (SCT) scoring methods in the evaluation of clinical reasoning, studies examining these methods in nursing are relatively scarce. This study explored the psychometric properties of five SCT scoring methods.
METHOD METHODS
An SCT was administered to 12 experts and 43 learners. Scores were calculated using five methods and descriptive statistics. Differences in scores were assessed with the Mann-Whitney U test, and Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated for the different methods.
RESULTS RESULTS
The median scores of both experts and learners differed substantially according to the scoring method used. Learners' scores were statistically different from experts' scores (
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Further research is needed to refine the influence of SCT scoring methods for use in certifying assessment of clinical reasoning in nursing.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37812827
doi: 10.3928/01484834-20230815-05
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

549-555

Auteurs

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH