Stroke in children and adolescents: Analysis of electrophysiological and behavioral assessment findings of auditory processing.
Adolescents
Auditory evoked potentials
Auditory processing disorders
Children
Hearing
Stroke
Journal
Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)
ISSN: 1980-5322
Titre abrégé: Clinics (Sao Paulo)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101244734
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
09
03
2023
revised:
25
08
2023
accepted:
06
09
2023
medline:
1
11
2023
pubmed:
10
10
2023
entrez:
9
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study aimed to analyze the auditory processing behavior of children and adolescents diagnosed with stroke and compare it with that of typically developing individuals. This was an analytical cross-sectional study involving 48 participants aged between 7 and 17 years with adequate schooling for age and grade, allocated equally to two groups: Stroke (SG) and Control Groups (CG). For the SG, cases identified between 2003 and 2018 were considered. In the CG, school-aged participants with typical development were randomized. After screening for differential audiological assessment and confirmation of auditory pathway integrity at the brainstem level, binaural analyses of the auditory processing behavior were conducted using the Dichotic Digit Test (DDT), Frequency Pattern Test (FPT), and electrophysiological assessment (P300). The Shapiro-Wilk test for normality was conducted, followed by the T and Mann-Whitney tests, with a 95 % confidence level and significance offset at p < 0.05, using the SPSS software (IBM®, v. 22.) RESULTS: The CG performed better in terms of auditory processing. These differences were significant (p < 0.0001) for the binaural integration of DDT, FPT humming and Labeling, and P300 latency. The P300 results were similar; however, with a greater amplitude in the SG. This study showed that children and adolescents with stroke performed worse in electrophysiological and behavioral tests of auditory processing assessed using the auditory evoked potentials. These data reinforce the hypothesis that stroke-related lesions compromise the neural mechanisms underlying auditory processing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37812955
pii: S1807-5932(23)00122-9
doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2023.100286
pmc: PMC10569949
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
100286Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 HCFMUSP. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Références
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2016 Apr-Jun;14(2):208-12
pubmed: 27462895
Neurology. 2003 Jul 22;61(2):189-94
pubmed: 12874397
Audiology. 1990;29(6):304-13
pubmed: 2275645
Neuroimage Clin. 2016 Oct 23;13:228-236
pubmed: 28003962
Arch Otolaryngol. 1970 Oct;92(4):311-24
pubmed: 5455571
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2023 Jun;7(1):
pubmed: 37270200
Ear Hear. 2017 May/Jun;38(3):314-320
pubmed: 27941404
Stroke. 2013 Sep;44(9):2468-74
pubmed: 23860296
Lancet. 2002 Nov 16;360(9345):1540-5
pubmed: 12443591
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2004 Mar;4(2):129-38
pubmed: 14984685
Emerg Med Int. 2011;2011:734506
pubmed: 22254140
BMC Infect Dis. 2012 Mar 31;12:79
pubmed: 22462525
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016 May;35(5):597-602
pubmed: 26996929
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Sep;75(9):1117-22
pubmed: 21719119
Neurology. 2006 Aug 22;67(4):614-9
pubmed: 16924014
Audiology. 1987;26(2):79-88
pubmed: 3606474
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2002 Dec;60(4):959-63
pubmed: 12563387
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2014 Sep;72(9):680-6
pubmed: 25252231
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015 Nov;57(11):1027-34
pubmed: 26307431
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 May;161(5):463-9
pubmed: 17485622
J Am Acad Audiol. 1994 Jul;5(4):265-8
pubmed: 7949300
Biomedicines. 2022 Dec 20;11(1):
pubmed: 36672510
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2003 Jun;28(3):227-30
pubmed: 12755761
Neurobiol Aging. 2009 Dec;30(12):2065-79
pubmed: 18339453
J Clin Neurosci. 2018 Sep;55:45-51
pubmed: 30077473
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2014 Jan;14(1):422
pubmed: 24384876
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2009 Nov-Dec;85(6):469-79
pubmed: 20016868
Aging Dis. 2021 Jul 1;12(4):1043-1055
pubmed: 34221548
Stroke. 2012 May;43(5):1285-9
pubmed: 22382162
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2014 Sep;30(9):660-4
pubmed: 25186513
Handb Clin Neurol. 2015;129:633-47
pubmed: 25726294
Pro Fono. 2007 Oct-Dec;19(4):393-400
pubmed: 18200390
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2006 Jun;64(2A):181-5
pubmed: 16791352
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 3;11:CD007039
pubmed: 36326118
Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2017 Sep;67:23-33
pubmed: 28336156
Codas. 2021 Aug 23;33(6):e20200314
pubmed: 34431857
J Emerg Med. 2016 Jul;51(1):73-6
pubmed: 27131834
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2008 Apr;55(2):323-38, viii
pubmed: 18381089
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2013 Jan;71(1):11-7
pubmed: 23288020
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 1999 Sep;57(3A):587-93
pubmed: 10667281
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Sep-Oct;79(5):609-15
pubmed: 24141677
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2020 Jun 03;18:eAO5225
pubmed: 32578676
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Mar;39(6):586-593
pubmed: 27008578
J Child Neurol. 2010 Jul;25(7):829-33
pubmed: 20110218
Neuropsychologia. 1996 Feb;34(2):127-37
pubmed: 8852875
Eur J Clin Invest. 2012 Jul;42(7):784-94
pubmed: 22248042