Cerebrovascular Events in Older Patients With Patent Foramen Ovale: Current Status and Future Perspectives.
Cryptogenic stroke
Elderly population
Patent foramen ovale
Journal
Journal of stroke
ISSN: 2287-6391
Titre abrégé: J Stroke
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101602023
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Sep 2023
Historique:
received:
15
05
2023
accepted:
21
08
2023
medline:
10
10
2023
pubmed:
10
10
2023
entrez:
9
10
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure, along with medical therapy, has emerged as the therapeutic gold standard in younger (<60-year-old) patients with a PFO-related stroke for preventing recurrent events. However, PFO management guidelines lack definite recommendations for older (>60 years) patients with a PFO-related cerebrovascular event, a complex group of patients who were mostly excluded from PFO closure clinical trials. Nevertheless, several studies have shown a higher prevalence of PFO among older patients with cryptogenic stroke, and its presence has been associated with an increased risk of recurrent events. Furthermore, older patients exhibit a higher prevalence of high-risk PFO anatomical features, present inherent age-related risk factors that might increase the risk of paradoxical embolism through a PFO, and have a higher incidence of ischemic events after a PFO-related event. Additionally, observational studies have shown the safety and preliminary efficacy of PFO closure in older PFO-related stroke patients. Yet, higher rates of recurrent cerebrovascular events and new-onset atrial fibrillation were observed in some studies among older patients compared to their younger counterparts. After careful case-by-case evaluation, including the assessment of hidden potential cardioembolic sources of a cryptogenic stroke other than PFO, transcatheter PFO closure might be a safe and effective therapeutic option for preventing recurrent thromboembolic events in patients >60 years with a high-risk PFO-associated stroke. Ongoing trials will provide important insights into the role of PFO closure in the elderly population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37813671
pii: jos.2023.01599
doi: 10.5853/jos.2023.01599
pmc: PMC10574307
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
338-349Références
JAMA. 2021 May 25;325(20):2116-2118
pubmed: 34032839
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2020 Mar;73(3):219-224
pubmed: 31585849
Stroke. 2021 May;52(5):1653-1661
pubmed: 33611943
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 22;71(20):2335-2342
pubmed: 29544871
Eur Stroke J. 2019 Dec;4(4):307-317
pubmed: 31903429
Front Neurol. 2022 May 17;13:860827
pubmed: 35655618
Can J Neurol Sci. 2022 May;49(3):315-337
pubmed: 34140063
J Neurol. 2012 Jun;259(6):1051-5
pubmed: 22057407
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jan 28;75(3):333-340
pubmed: 31976872
Neurology. 2009 Jul 14;73(2):89-97
pubmed: 19439720
Echocardiography. 2020 Jun;37(6):939-944
pubmed: 32426851
Neurology. 2014 Jul 15;83(3):221-6
pubmed: 24928123
Front Neurol. 2020 Apr 28;11:281
pubmed: 32411074
Stroke. 2004 Sep;35(9):2145-9
pubmed: 15232117
J Neurol. 2018 Mar;265(3):578-585
pubmed: 29356972
Front Neurol. 2020 May 05;11:336
pubmed: 32431661
Neurology. 2020 May 19;94(20):876-885
pubmed: 32350058
Stroke. 2020 Oct;51(10):3119-3123
pubmed: 32921262
Eur Heart J. 2019 Oct 7;40(38):3182-3195
pubmed: 30358849
N Engl J Med. 2017 Sep 14;377(11):1033-1042
pubmed: 28902580
Echocardiography. 2014;31(1):5-11
pubmed: 23822635
Br Med J. 1946 Jun 1;1:836
pubmed: 20984769
Neurol Sci. 2022 Jan;43(1):453-458
pubmed: 34050831
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 May 12;75(18):2312-2320
pubmed: 32381162
N Engl J Med. 1988 May 5;318(18):1148-52
pubmed: 3362165
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Jul 1;77(7):878-886
pubmed: 32282016
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Feb 15;87(3):508-14
pubmed: 26106024
Lancet Neurol. 2018 Jul;17(7):609-617
pubmed: 29887162
Stroke. 2018 Jun;49(6):1541-1548
pubmed: 29760277
JAMA Neurol. 2022 Nov 1;79(11):1175-1179
pubmed: 36215079
N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 29;357(22):2262-8
pubmed: 18046029
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Nov 8;164(20):2260-5
pubmed: 15534164
Cardiology. 2019;144(1-2):40-49
pubmed: 31574522
Neurology. 2000 Oct 24;55(8):1172-9
pubmed: 11071496
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Oct 1;77(10):1279-1287
pubmed: 32628255
Stroke. 2021 Jul;52(7):e364-e467
pubmed: 34024117
Stroke. 2009 Jul;40(7):2349-55
pubmed: 19443800
N Engl J Med. 2017 Sep 14;377(11):1011-1021
pubmed: 28902593
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2022 Jan 3;24(1):2
pubmed: 34980185
Lancet. 2001 May 12;357(9267):1485-9
pubmed: 11377600
Neurology. 2022 May 10;98(19):e1942-e1952
pubmed: 35264426
Mayo Clin Proc. 1984 Jan;59(1):17-20
pubmed: 6694427
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019 Jul;32(7):811-816
pubmed: 31130417
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 15;366(11):991-9
pubmed: 22417252
Can J Cardiol. 2016 Aug;32(8):986.e9-986.e16
pubmed: 26952158
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Jul 1;106(1):129-34
pubmed: 20609660
N Engl J Med. 2017 Sep 14;377(11):1022-1032
pubmed: 28902590
N Engl J Med. 2021 Mar 11;384(10):970-971
pubmed: 33704944
J Stroke. 2021 May;23(2):289-292
pubmed: 34102766
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jul;15(7):e011652
pubmed: 35735021
N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 21;368(12):1083-91
pubmed: 23514285
Circulation. 2022 Feb 22;145(8):e153-e639
pubmed: 35078371
JAMA. 2021 Dec 14;326(22):2277-2286
pubmed: 34905030
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2021 Dec;34(12):1285-1293.e3
pubmed: 34389468
Neurology. 2022 Jan 18;98(3):e279-e290
pubmed: 34911748
Neurology. 2013 Aug 13;81(7):619-25
pubmed: 23864310
Clin Cardiol. 2021 Mar;44(3):386-391
pubmed: 33595868
Front Neurol. 2023 Mar 14;14:1103664
pubmed: 36998779
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Jul;68(1):136-42; discussion 143-4
pubmed: 16755591
Arch Intern Med. 1994 Apr 25;154(8):861-6
pubmed: 8154949
BMJ. 2022 Feb 9;376:e063161
pubmed: 35140114
Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2021 Jun 15;11(3):316-329
pubmed: 34322302
Neurol Res Pract. 2021 Apr 1;3(1):16
pubmed: 33789756
J Vasc Surg. 1996 Mar;23(3):511-6
pubmed: 8601896