Adrenal Metastases Are Associated with Poor Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Nivolumab in the GETUG-AFU-26 NIVOREN Phase 2 Trial.

Adrenal metastases GETUG-AFU-26 NIVOREN trial Glandular metastases Immunotherapy Nivolumab Pancreatic metastases Renal cell carcinoma

Journal

European urology oncology
ISSN: 2588-9311
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Oncol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101724904

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Oct 2023
Historique:
received: 23 05 2023
revised: 05 09 2023
accepted: 14 09 2023
medline: 10 10 2023
pubmed: 10 10 2023
entrez: 9 10 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Glandular metastases (GMs; adrenal gland, pancreas, thyroid, ovary, breast, or prostate) are rare in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC). Previous studies have indicated that GM patients treated with antiangiogenic therapy experience significantly longer overall survival (OS). To assess outcomes for mccRCC with or without GMs treated with nivolumab. The GETUG-AFU-26 NIVOREN phase 2 trial evaluated the activity and safety of nivolumab in patients with mccRCC who experienced failure of antiangiogenic therapies (NCT03013335). In this ancillary study, patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of at least one GM. The primary outcome was OS; secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and the objective response rate (ORR). Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression models are used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for survival outcomes. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with pancreatic metastases and patients with adrenal metastases. Among 720 patients treated with nivolumab between February 2016 and July 2017, 217 had GMs, of whom 151/217 had adrenal metastases and 86/217 had pancreatic metastasis. Patients with adrenal metastases had worse 12-mo OS (64% vs 71.1%) and 6-mo PFS (27.2% vs 36.6%) and a lower objective response rate (12.5%, 95% CI 7.6%-19.0%, vs 23.2%, 95% CI 19.8-27.0%; p = 0.005) than patients without adrenal metastases. Conversely, univariate analysis showed that patients with pancreatic metastases had significantly better 12-mo OS (82.3% vs 67.9%; HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.40-0.85) in comparison to patients with nonpancreatic GMs. On multivariable analysis, only adrenal metastasis remained associated with adverse prognosis. Adrenal metastasis is an independent prognostic factor for poor response and survival in the GETUG-AFU-26 NIVOREN trial. Limited activity with nivolumab was observed for patients with mccRCC with adrenal metastases. These results warrant an evaluation of the prognostic value of adrenal metastases in patients treated with immunotherapy combinations with ipilimumab or tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Our study showed that metastasis in the adrenal glands could be an independent factor associated with poor response to immunotherapy and survival for patients with metastatic kidney cancer. It would be useful to evaluate the prognostic value of adrenal gland metastasis in patients treated with immunotherapy combinations or immunotherapy agents combined with drugs called tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Glandular metastases (GMs; adrenal gland, pancreas, thyroid, ovary, breast, or prostate) are rare in metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC). Previous studies have indicated that GM patients treated with antiangiogenic therapy experience significantly longer overall survival (OS).
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
To assess outcomes for mccRCC with or without GMs treated with nivolumab.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS METHODS
The GETUG-AFU-26 NIVOREN phase 2 trial evaluated the activity and safety of nivolumab in patients with mccRCC who experienced failure of antiangiogenic therapies (NCT03013335). In this ancillary study, patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of at least one GM.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS METHODS
The primary outcome was OS; secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and the objective response rate (ORR). Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression models are used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for survival outcomes. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with pancreatic metastases and patients with adrenal metastases.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS CONCLUSIONS
Among 720 patients treated with nivolumab between February 2016 and July 2017, 217 had GMs, of whom 151/217 had adrenal metastases and 86/217 had pancreatic metastasis. Patients with adrenal metastases had worse 12-mo OS (64% vs 71.1%) and 6-mo PFS (27.2% vs 36.6%) and a lower objective response rate (12.5%, 95% CI 7.6%-19.0%, vs 23.2%, 95% CI 19.8-27.0%; p = 0.005) than patients without adrenal metastases. Conversely, univariate analysis showed that patients with pancreatic metastases had significantly better 12-mo OS (82.3% vs 67.9%; HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.40-0.85) in comparison to patients with nonpancreatic GMs. On multivariable analysis, only adrenal metastasis remained associated with adverse prognosis.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Adrenal metastasis is an independent prognostic factor for poor response and survival in the GETUG-AFU-26 NIVOREN trial. Limited activity with nivolumab was observed for patients with mccRCC with adrenal metastases. These results warrant an evaluation of the prognostic value of adrenal metastases in patients treated with immunotherapy combinations with ipilimumab or tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
PATIENT SUMMARY RESULTS
Our study showed that metastasis in the adrenal glands could be an independent factor associated with poor response to immunotherapy and survival for patients with metastatic kidney cancer. It would be useful to evaluate the prognostic value of adrenal gland metastasis in patients treated with immunotherapy combinations or immunotherapy agents combined with drugs called tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37813745
pii: S2588-9311(23)00200-6
doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.09.009
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Emilien Billon (E)

Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France. Electronic address: billone@ipc.unicancer.fr.

Cécile Dalban (C)

Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.

Stephane Oudard (S)

Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, University of Paris, Paris, France.

Christine Chevreau (C)

IUCT-Oncopôle Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France.

Brigitte Laguerre (B)

Centre Eugéne Marquis, Rennes, France.

Philippe Barthélémy (P)

Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France.

Delphine Borchiellini (D)

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.

Lionnel Geoffrois (L)

Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Centre Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France.

Sylvie Negrier (S)

Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.

Florence Joly (F)

Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.

Antoine Thiery-Vuillemin (A)

University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France.

Marine Gross-Goupil (M)

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux, France.

Frederic Rolland (F)

Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblain, France.

Frank Priou (F)

CHD Vendee-Hopital Les Oudairies, La Roche-Sur-Yon, France.

Hakim Mahammedi (H)

Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Florence Tantot (F)

GETUG Group, UNICANCER, Paris, France.

Bernard Escudier (B)

Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

Sylvie Chabaud (S)

Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.

Laurence Albiges (L)

Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

Gwenaelle Gravis (G)

Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.

Classifications MeSH