The prediction of sagittal chin point relapse following two-jaw surgery using machine learning.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 10 2023
09 10 2023
Historique:
received:
02
04
2023
accepted:
04
10
2023
medline:
2
11
2023
pubmed:
10
10
2023
entrez:
9
10
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The study aimed to identify critical factors associated with the surgical stability of pogonion (Pog) by applying machine learning (ML) to predict relapse following two-jaw orthognathic surgery (2 J-OGJ). The sample set comprised 227 patients (110 males and 117 females, 207 training and 20 test sets). Using lateral cephalograms taken at the initial evaluation (T0), pretreatment (T1), after (T2) 2 J-OGS, and post treatment (T3), 55 linear and angular skeletal and dental surgical movements (T2-T1) were measured. Six ML modes were utilized, including classification and regression trees (CART), conditional inference tree (CTREE), and random forest (RF). The training samples were classified into three groups; highly significant (HS) (≥ 4), significant (S) (≥ 2 and < 4), and insignificant (N), depending on Pog relapse. RF indicated that the most important variable that affected relapse rank prediction was ramus inclination (RI), CTREE and CART revealed that a clockwise rotation of more than 3.7 and 1.8 degrees of RI was a risk factor for HS and S groups, respectively. RF, CTREE, and CART were practical tools for predicting surgical stability. More than 1.8 degrees of CW rotation of the ramus during surgery would lead to significant Pog relapse.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37813915
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44207-2
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-44207-2
pmc: PMC10562368
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
17005Informations de copyright
© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Troy, B. A., Shanker, S., Fields, H. W., Vig, K. & Johnston, W. Comparison of incisor inclination in patients with Class III malocclusion treated with orthognathic surgery or orthodontic camouflage. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 135(146), e1-146.e9 (2009).
Proffit, W. R., Turvey, T. A. & Phillips, C. Orthognathic surgery: A hierarchy of stability. Int. J. Adult Orthodon. Orthognath. Surg. 11, 191–204 (1996).
pubmed: 9456622
Proffit, W. R., Bailey, L. J., Phillips, C. & Turvey, T. A. Long-term stability of surgical open-bite correction by Le Fort I osteotomy. Angle Orthod. 70, 112–117 (2000).
pubmed: 10832998
Bailey, L., Cevidanes, L. H. & Proffit, W. R. Stability and predictability of orthognathic surgery. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 126, 273–277 (2004).
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.06.003
Proffit, W. R., Turvey, T. A. & Phillips, C. The hierarchy of stability and predictability in orthognathic surgery with rigid fixation: An update and extension. Head Face Med. 3, 21 (2007).
doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-3-21
pubmed: 17470277
pmcid: 1876453
Cho, H. J. Long-term stability of surgical mandibular setback. Angle Orthod. 77, 851–856 (2007).
doi: 10.2319/052306-209.1
pubmed: 17685766
Al-Delayme, R., Al-Khen, M., Hamdoon, Z. & Jerjes, W. Skeletal and dental relapses after skeletal class III deformity correction surgery: Single-jaw versus double-jaw procedures. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 115, 466–472 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2012.08.443
pubmed: 23177758
Sarker, I. H. Deep learning: A comprehensive overview on techniques, taxonomy, applications and research directions. SN Comput. Sci. 2, 420 (2021).
doi: 10.1007/s42979-021-00815-1
pubmed: 34426802
pmcid: 8372231
Jung, S. K. & Kim, T. W. New approach for the diagnosis of extractions with neural network machine learning. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 149, 127–133 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.07.030
pubmed: 26718386
Etemad, L. et al. Machine learning from clinical data sets of a contemporary decision for orthodontic tooth extraction. Orthod. Craniofac. Res. 24(Suppl 2), 193–200 (2021).
doi: 10.1111/ocr.12502
pubmed: 34031981
Li, P. et al. Orthodontic treatment planning based on artificial neural networks. Sci. Rep. 9, 2037 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-38439-w
pubmed: 30765756
pmcid: 6375961
Fang, X. et al. Machine-learning-based detection of degenerative temporomandibular joint diseases using lateral cephalograms. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 163, 260-271.e5 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2022.10.015
pubmed: 36710061
Lee, K. S., Jha, N. & Kim, Y. J. Risk factor assessments of temporomandibular disorders via machine learning. Sci. Rep. 11, 19802 (2021).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98837-5
pubmed: 34611188
pmcid: 8492627
Elfanagely, O. et al. Machine learning and surgical outcomes prediction: A systematic review. J. Surg. Res. 264, 346–361 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.02.045
pubmed: 33848833
Cohen, J. Statistical power analysis. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 1(3), 98–101 (1992).
doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783
Rajput, D., Wang, W.-J. & Chen, C.-C. Evaluation of a decided sample size in machine learning applications. BMC Bioinform. 24, 48 (2023).
doi: 10.1186/s12859-023-05156-9
Batra, M. & Agrawal, R. Comparative analysis of decision tree algorithms. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. Nature Inspired Computing (eds Panigrahi, B. et al.) 31–36 (Springer Singapore, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6747-1_4 .
doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-6747-1_4
Hothorn, T., Hornik, K. & Zeileis, A. Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. J. Comput. Graph Stat. 15, 651–674 (2006).
doi: 10.1198/106186006X133933
Wu, L., Shen, C. & Van Den Hengel, A. Deep linear discriminant analysis on fisher networks: A hybrid architecture for person re-identification. Pattern Recogn. 65, 238–250 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2016.12.022
Schölkopf, B. Support Vector Learning (Oldenbourg, 1997).
Bhatia, N. Vandana. Survey of nearest neighbor techniques. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Secur. 8, 302–305 (2010).
Breiman, L., Last, M. & Rice, J. Random forests: Finding quasars. In Statistical Challenges in Astronomy (eds Breiman, L. et al.) 243–254 (Springer-Verlag, 2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21529-8_16 .
doi: 10.1007/0-387-21529-8_16
Brodeur, Z. P., Herman, J. D. & Steinschneider, S. Bootstrap aggregation and cross-validation methods to reduce overfitting in reservoir control policy search. Water Resour. Res. 56, e2020WR027184 (2020).
doi: 10.1029/2020WR027184
Nematzadeh, Z., Ibrahim, R. & Selamat, A. Comparative studies on breast cancer classifications with k-fold cross validations using machine learning techniques. In 2015 10th Asian Control Conference (ASCC) (eds Nematzadeh, Z. et al.) 1–6 (IEEE, 2015).
Prusty, S., Patnaik, S. & Dash, S. K. SKCV: Stratified K-fold cross-validation on ML classifiers for predicting cervical cancer. Front. Nanotechnol. 4, 972421 (2022).
doi: 10.3389/fnano.2022.972421
Friedrich, S. et al. Is there a role for statistics in artificial intelligence?. Adv. Data Anal. Classif. 16, 823–846 (2021).
doi: 10.1007/s11634-021-00455-6
Kang, S. Y. et al. Stability of clockwise rotation of the maxillary occlusal plane in skeletal Class III patients treated with two-jaw surgery. Orthod. Craniofac. Res. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12601 (2022).
doi: 10.1111/ocr.12601
pubmed: 36177997
Batbold, M. et al. Vertical bony step between proximal and distal segments after mandibular setback is related with relapse: A cone-beam computed tomographic study. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofacial Orthop. 161, e524–e533 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.10.016
pubmed: 35305890