Studying the neural representations of uncertainty.


Journal

Nature neuroscience
ISSN: 1546-1726
Titre abrégé: Nat Neurosci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9809671

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Historique:
received: 08 02 2022
accepted: 30 08 2023
medline: 3 11 2023
pubmed: 10 10 2023
entrez: 9 10 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The study of the brain's representations of uncertainty is a central topic in neuroscience. Unlike most quantities of which the neural representation is studied, uncertainty is a property of an observer's beliefs about the world, which poses specific methodological challenges. We analyze how the literature on the neural representations of uncertainty addresses those challenges and distinguish between 'code-driven' and 'correlational' approaches. Code-driven approaches make assumptions about the neural code for representing world states and the associated uncertainty. By contrast, correlational approaches search for relationships between uncertainty and neural activity without constraints on the neural representation of the world state that this uncertainty accompanies. To compare these two approaches, we apply several criteria for neural representations: sensitivity, specificity, invariance and functionality. Our analysis reveals that the two approaches lead to different but complementary findings, shaping new research questions and guiding future experiments.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37814025
doi: 10.1038/s41593-023-01444-y
pii: 10.1038/s41593-023-01444-y
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1857-1867

Subventions

Organisme : EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council)
ID : StG-947105
Organisme : Agence Nationale de la Recherche (French National Research Agency)
ID : 18-CE37-0010-01

Informations de copyright

© 2023. Springer Nature America, Inc.

Références

Ballard, D. H. Brain Computation as Hierarchical Abstraction (MIT Press, 2015).
Hoyer, P. O. & Hyvärinen, A. Interpreting neural response variability as Monte Carlo sampling of the posterior. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 293–300 (2002). An influential article that proposed that neural activity could be explained with a sampling-based code.
Knill, D. C. & Pouget, A. The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation. Trends Neurosci. 27, 712–719 (2004).
pubmed: 15541511 doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2004.10.007
Lee, T. S. & Mumford, D. Hierarchical Bayesian inference in the visual cortex. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A Opt. Image Sci. Vis. 20, 1434–1448 (2003).
pubmed: 12868647 doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.20.001434
Ma, W. J. & Jazayeri, M. Neural coding of uncertainty and probability. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 37, 205–220 (2014).
pubmed: 25032495 doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014017
Bach, D. R. & Dolan, R. J. Knowing how much you don’t know: a neural organization of uncertainty estimates. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 572–586 (2012).
pubmed: 22781958 doi: 10.1038/nrn3289
Muller, T. H., Mars, R. B., Behrens, T. E. & O’Reilly, J. X. Control of entropy in neural models of environmental state. eLife 8, e39404 (2019).
pubmed: 30816090 pmcid: 6395063 doi: 10.7554/eLife.39404
Rushworth, M. F. S. & Behrens, T. E. J. Choice, uncertainty and value in prefrontal and cingulate cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 11, 389–397 (2008).
pubmed: 18368045 doi: 10.1038/nn2066
Tomov, M. S., Truong, V. Q., Hundia, R. A. & Gershman, S. J. Dissociable neural correlates of uncertainty underlie different exploration strategies. Nat. Commun. 11, 2371 (2020).
pubmed: 32398675 pmcid: 7217879 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15766-z
Behrens, T. E. J., Woolrich, M. W., Walton, M. E. & Rushworth, M. F. S. Learning the value of information in an uncertain world. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 1214–1221 (2007).
pubmed: 17676057 doi: 10.1038/nn1954
McGuire, J. T., Nassar, M. R., Gold, J. I. & Kable, J. W. Functionally dissociable influences on learning rate in a dynamic environment. Neuron 84, 870–881 (2014).
pubmed: 25459409 pmcid: 4437663 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.013
Meyniel, F., Schlunegger, D. & Dehaene, S. The sense of confidence during probabilistic learning: a normative account. PLoS Comput Biol. 11, e1004305 (2015).
pubmed: 26076466 pmcid: 4468157 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004305
O’Reilly, J. X. Making predictions in a changing world—inference, uncertainty, and learning. Front. Neurosci. 7, 105 (2013).
pubmed: 23785310 pmcid: 3682109
Kersten, D., Mamassian, P. & Yuille, A. Object perception as Bayesian inference. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55, 271–304 (2004).
pubmed: 14744217 doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142005
Qamar, A. T. et al. Trial-to-trial, uncertainty-based adjustment of decision boundaries in visual categorization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 20332–20337 (2013).
pubmed: 24272938 pmcid: 3864339 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219756110
Zhou, Y., Acerbi, L. & Ma, W. J. The role of sensory uncertainty in simple contour integration. PLoS Comput. Biol. 16, e1006308 (2020).
pubmed: 33253195 pmcid: 7728286 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006308
Alais, D. & Burr, D. The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration. Curr. Biol. 14, 257–262 (2004).
pubmed: 14761661 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.01.029
Deroy, O., Spence, C. & Noppeney, U. Metacognition in multisensory perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20, 736–747 (2016).
pubmed: 27612983 doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.08.006
Ernst, M. O. & Banks, M. S. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415, 429–433 (2002).
pubmed: 11807554 doi: 10.1038/415429a
Trommershäuser, J., Kording, K. & Landy, M. S. Sensory Cue Integration (Oxford Univ. Press, 2011).
Todorov, E. Optimality principles in sensorimotor control. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 907–915 (2004).
pubmed: 15332089 pmcid: 1488877 doi: 10.1038/nn1309
Trommershäuser, J., Maloney, L. T. & Landy, M. S. Decision making, movement planning and statistical decision theory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12, 291–297 (2008).
pubmed: 18614390 doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.04.010
Flavell, J. H. & Wellman, H. M. in Perspectives on the Development of Memory and Cognition (eds. Kail, R. V. Jr & Hagen, J. W.) 3–33 (L. Erlbaum, 1977).
Koriat, A., Sheffer, L. & Ma’ayan, H. Comparing objective and subjective learning curves: Judgments of learning exhibit increased underconfidence with practice. J. Exp. Psychol. 131, 147–162 (2002).
doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.131.2.147
Rademaker, R. L., Tredway, C. H. & Tong, F. Introspective judgments predict the precision and likelihood of successful maintenance of visual working memory. J. Vis. 12, 21 (2012).
pubmed: 23262153 pmcid: 4504333 doi: 10.1167/12.13.21
Yoo, A. H., Acerbi, L. & Ma, W. J. Uncertainty is maintained and used in working memory. J. Vis. 21, 13 (2021).
pubmed: 34369970 pmcid: 8356567 doi: 10.1167/jov.21.8.13
Dekleva, B. M., Ramkumar, P., Wanda, P. A., Kording, K. P. & Miller, L. E. Uncertainty leads to persistent effects on reach representations in dorsal premotor cortex. eLife 5, e14316 (2016).
pubmed: 27420609 pmcid: 4946902 doi: 10.7554/eLife.14316
Devkar, D., Wright, A. A. & Ma, W. J. Monkeys and humans take local uncertainty into account when localizing a change. J. Vis. 17, 4 (2017).
pubmed: 28877535 pmcid: 5588915 doi: 10.1167/17.11.4
Fiorillo, C. D. Discrete coding of reward probability and uncertainty by dopamine neurons. Science 299, 1898–1902 (2003).
pubmed: 12649484 doi: 10.1126/science.1077349
Kepecs, A., Uchida, N., Zariwala, H. A. & Mainen, Z. F. Neural correlates, computation and behavioural impact of decision confidence. Nature 455, 227–231 (2008).
pubmed: 18690210 doi: 10.1038/nature07200
Kiani, R. & Shadlen, M. N. Representation of confidence associated with a decision by neurons in the parietal cortex. Science 324, 759–764 (2009).
pubmed: 19423820 pmcid: 2738936 doi: 10.1126/science.1169405
Komura, Y., Nikkuni, A., Hirashima, N., Uetake, T. & Miyamoto, A. Responses of pulvinar neurons reflect a subject’s confidence in visual categorization. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 749–755 (2013).
pubmed: 23666179 doi: 10.1038/nn.3393
Lak, A. et al. Orbitofrontal cortex is required for optimal waiting based on decision confidence. Neuron 84, 190–201 (2014).
pubmed: 25242219 pmcid: 4364549 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.039
Odegaard, B. et al. Superior colliculus neuronal ensemble activity signals optimal rather than subjective confidence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E1588–E1597 (2018).
pubmed: 29382765 pmcid: 5816145 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1711628115
Walker, E. Y., Cotton, R. J., Ma, W. J. & Tolias, A. S. A neural basis of probabilistic computation in visual cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 23, 122–129 (2020). Example of the code-driven approach that uses a probabilistic population code estimated in a data-driven manner by means of an artificial neural network. The uncertainty derived from multiunit recordings accounts for the monkey choices.
pubmed: 31873286 doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0554-5
Helmholtz, H. Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik (Leopold Voss, 1867).
Shannon, C. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379–423 (1948).
doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
Beck, J. M., Ma, W. J., Pitkow, X., Latham, P. E. & Pouget, A. Not noisy, just wrong: the role of suboptimal inference in behavioral variability. Neuron 74, 30–39 (2012).
pubmed: 22500627 pmcid: 4486264 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.016
Rahnev, D. & Denison, R. N. Suboptimality in perceptual decision making. Behav. Brain Sci. 41, e223 (2018).
pubmed: 29485020 pmcid: 6110994 doi: 10.1017/S0140525X18000936
Iglesias, S. et al. Hierarchical prediction errors in midbrain and basal forebrain during sensory learning. Neuron 80, 519–530 (2013).
pubmed: 24139048 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.09.009
Mathys, C. D. et al. Uncertainty in perception and the hierarchical gaussian filter. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8, 825 (2014).
pubmed: 25477800 pmcid: 4237059 doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00825
Norton, E. H., Acerbi, L., Ma, W. J. & Landy, M. S. Human online adaptation to changes in prior probability. PLOS Comput. Biol. 15, e1006681 (2019).
pubmed: 31283765 pmcid: 6638982 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006681
Barthelmé, S. & Mamassian, P. Evaluation of objective uncertainty in the visual system. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000504 (2009).
pubmed: 19750003 pmcid: 2730538 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000504
Necker, L. A. Observations on some remarkable optical phænomena seen in Switzerland; and on an optical phænomenon which occurs on viewing a figure of a crystal or geometrical solid. Lond. Edinb. Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 1, 329–337 (1832).
doi: 10.1080/14786443208647909
Faisal, A. A., Selen, L. P. J. & Wolpert, D. M. Noise in the nervous system. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 292–303 (2008).
pubmed: 18319728 pmcid: 2631351 doi: 10.1038/nrn2258
Meyniel, F. Brain dynamics for confidence-weighted learning. PLOS Comput. Biol. 16, e1007935 (2020).
pubmed: 32484806 pmcid: 7292419 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007935
Meyniel, F. & Dehaene, S. Brain networks for confidence weighting and hierarchical inference during probabilistic learning. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1615773114 (2017). Example of a correlational approach that uses an ideal observer model of the input to derive uncertainty about a probability. The study reports fMRI correlates of this uncertainty distinct from correlates of confounding factors like unpredictability and surprise.
O’Reilly, J. X., Jbabdi, S., Rushworth, M. F. S. & Behrens, T. E. J. Brain systems for probabilistic and dynamic prediction: computational specificity and integration. PLoS Biol. 11, e1001662 (2013).
pubmed: 24086106 pmcid: 3782423 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001662
Payzan-LeNestour, E., Dunne, S., Bossaerts, P. & O’Doherty, J. P. The neural representation of unexpected uncertainty during value-based decision making. Neuron 79, 191–201 (2013).
pubmed: 23849203 pmcid: 4885745 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.04.037
Vilares, I., Howard, J. D., Fernandes, H. L., Gottfried, J. A. & Kording, K. P. Differential representations of prior and likelihood uncertainty in the human brain. Curr. Biol. 22, 1641–1648 (2012). Example of correlational approach that used specific features of the input (scatter) as a proxy for uncertainty (about the location of a cloud of dots). The fMRI correlates of this uncertainty are distinct from prior uncertainty.
pubmed: 22840519 pmcid: 3461114 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.07.010
Geurts, L. S., Cooke, J. R. H., van Bergen, R. S. & Jehee, J. F. M. Subjective confidence reflects representation of Bayesian probability in cortex. Nat. Hum. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01247-w (2022). Example of a code-driven approach that uses a probabilistic population code estimated in a data-driven manner by means of a generalized linear model. The uncertainty derived from fMRI activity correlates with subjective reports of uncertainty.
Adler, W. T. & Ma, W. J. Comparing Bayesian and non-Bayesian accounts of human confidence reports. PLOS Comput. Biol. 14, e1006572 (2018).
pubmed: 30422974 pmcid: 6258566 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006572
De Martino, B., Fleming, S. M., Garrett, N. & Dolan, R. J. Confidence in value-based choice. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 105–110 (2013).
pubmed: 23222911 doi: 10.1038/nn.3279
Guggenmos, M., Wilbertz, G., Hebart, M. N. & Sterzer, P. Mesolimbic confidence signals guide perceptual learning in the absence of external feedback. eLife 5, e13388 (2016).
pubmed: 27021283 pmcid: 4821804 doi: 10.7554/eLife.13388
Hebart, M. N., Schriever, Y., Donner, T. H. & Haynes, J.-D. The relationship between perceptual decision variables and confidence in the human brain. Cereb. Cortex https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu181 (2014).
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu181 pubmed: 25112281
Lebreton, M., Abitbol, R., Daunizeau, J. & Pessiglione, M. Automatic integration of confidence in the brain valuation signal. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1159–1167 (2015).
pubmed: 26192748 doi: 10.1038/nn.4064
Li, H.-H., Sprague, T. C., Yoo, A. H., Ma, W. J. & Curtis, C. E. Joint representation of working memory and uncertainty in human cortex. Neuron 109, 3699–3712 (2021).
pubmed: 34525327 pmcid: 8602749 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.08.022
Meyniel, F., Sigman, M. & Mainen, Z. F. Confidence as bayesian probability: from neural origins to behavior. Neuron 88, 78–92 (2015).
pubmed: 26447574 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.039
Peirce, C. S. & Jastrow, J. On small differences in sensation. Mem. Natl Acad. Sci. 3, 75–83 (1884).
Pouget, A., Drugowitsch, J. & Kepecs, A. Confidence and certainty: distinct probabilistic quantities for different goals. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 366–374 (2016).
pubmed: 26906503 pmcid: 5378479 doi: 10.1038/nn.4240
Kepecs, A. & Mainen, Z. F. A computational framework for the study of confidence in humans and animals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 367, 1322–1337 (2012).
pubmed: 22492750 pmcid: 3318772 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0037
Tzagarakis, C., Ince, N. F., Leuthold, A. C. & Pellizzer, G. Beta-band activity during motor planning reflects response uncertainty. J. Neurosci. 30, 11270–11277 (2010).
pubmed: 20739547 pmcid: 6633326 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6026-09.2010
Zylberberg, A., Fetsch, C. R. & Shadlen, M. N. The influence of evidence volatility on choice, reaction time and confidence in a perceptual decision. eLife 5, e17688 (2016).
pubmed: 27787198 pmcid: 5083065 doi: 10.7554/eLife.17688
Masset, P., Ott, T., Lak, A., Hirokawa, J. & Kepecs, A. Behavior- and modality-general representation of confidence in orbitofrontal cortex. Cell 182, 112–126 (2020). Studies decision confidence in rats using waiting times as a proxy for uncertainty and identifies a neural representation of decision confidence in the orbitofrontal cortex that passes the tests of sensitivity, specificity (with respect to the features of the input), invariance (to the sensory modality) and functionality (correlation with learning).
pubmed: 32504542 pmcid: 8083070 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.022
Schmack, K., Bosc, M., Ott, T., Sturgill, J. F. & Kepecs, A. Striatal dopamine mediates hallucination-like perception in mice. Science 372, eabf4740 (2021).
pubmed: 33795430 doi: 10.1126/science.abf4740
Gherman, S. & Philiastides, M. G. Neural representations of confidence emerge from the process of decision formation during perceptual choices. NeuroImage 106, 134–143 (2015).
pubmed: 25463461 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.036
Hampton, R. R. Rhesus monkeys know when they remember. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 5359–5362 (2001).
pubmed: 11274360 pmcid: 33214 doi: 10.1073/pnas.071600998
Middlebrooks, P. G. & Sommer, M. A. Neuronal correlates of metacognition in primate frontal cortex. Neuron 75, 517–530 (2012).
pubmed: 22884334 pmcid: 3418516 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.05.028
van Bergen, R. S., Ma, W. J., Pratte, M. S. & Jehee, J. F. M. Sensory uncertainty decoded from visual cortex predicts behavior. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1728–1730 (2015).
pubmed: 26502262 pmcid: 4670781 doi: 10.1038/nn.4150
van Bergen, R. S. & Jehee, J. F. M. Probabilistic representation in human visual cortex reflects uncertainty in serial decisions. J. Neurosci. 39, 8164–8176 (2019).
pubmed: 31481435 pmcid: 6786811 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3212-18.2019
Badre, D., Doll, B. B., Long, N. M. & Frank, M. J. Rostrolateral prefrontal cortex and individual differences in uncertainty-driven exploration. Neuron 73, 595–607 (2012). Example of a correlational approach that uses an ideal observer model of the learning process to infer uncertainty in a task. Findings show evidence of a functional role for uncertainty (here, in terms of exploration).
pubmed: 22325209 pmcid: 3285405 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.025
Stern, E. R., Gonzalez, R., Welsh, R. C. & Taylor, S. F. Updating beliefs for a decision: neural correlates of uncertainty and underconfidence. J. Neurosci. 30, 8032–8041 (2010).
pubmed: 20534851 pmcid: 2896864 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4729-09.2010
Sedley, W. et al. Neural signatures of perceptual inference. eLife 5, e11476 (2016).
pubmed: 26949254 pmcid: 4841773 doi: 10.7554/eLife.11476
Festa, D., Aschner, A., Davila, A., Kohn, A. & Coen-Cagli, R. Neuronal variability reflects probabilistic inference tuned to natural image statistics. Nat. Commun. 12, 3635 (2021).
pubmed: 34131142 pmcid: 8206154 doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23838-x
Hénaff, O. J., Boundy-Singer, Z. M., Meding, K., Ziemba, C. M. & Goris, R. L. T. Representation of visual uncertainty through neural gain variability. Nat. Commun. 11, 2513 (2020).
pubmed: 32427825 pmcid: 7237668 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15533-0
Orbán, G., Berkes, P., Fiser, J. & Lengyel, M. Neural variability and sampling-based probabilistic representations in the visual cortex. Neuron 92, 530–543 (2016). Example of a code-driven approach that uses a sampling-based code and finds that neural variability (in spiking activity and membrane potential) changes along features of visual input related to uncertainty (for example, it quenches at the stimulus onset, decreases with contrast and aperture).
pubmed: 27764674 pmcid: 5077700 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.09.038
Bang, D. & Fleming, S. M. Distinct encoding of decision confidence in human medial prefrontal cortex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 6082–6087 (2018).
pubmed: 29784814 pmcid: 6003322 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800795115
Friston, K., Ashburner, J., Kiebel, S., Nichols, T. & Penny, W. Statistical Parametric Mapping: the Analysis of Functional Brain Images (Academic, 2007).
Naselaris, T., Kay, K. N., Nishimoto, S. & Gallant, J. L. Encoding and decoding in fMRI. NeuroImage 56, 400–410 (2011).
pubmed: 20691790 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.073
Poldrack, R. A., Huckins, G. & Varoquaux, G. Establishment of best practices for evidence for prediction: a review. JAMA Psychiatry 77, 534–540 (2020).
pubmed: 31774490 pmcid: 7250718 doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.3671
Lange, R. D., Shivkumar, S., Chattoraj, A. & Haefner, R. M. Bayesian encoding and decoding as distinct perspectives on neural coding. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.14.339770 (2021).
Shivkumar, S., Lange, R., Chattoraj, A. & Haefner, R. A probabilistic population code based on neural samples. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (eds. S. Bengio et al.) 31, 1–10 (MIT Press, 2018).
Barlow, H. B. Pattern recognition and the responses of sensory neurons. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 156, 872–881 (1969).
pubmed: 5258022 doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1969.tb14019.x
Deneve, S. Bayesian spiking neurons I: inference. Neural Comput. 20, 91–117 (2008).
pubmed: 18045002 doi: 10.1162/neco.2008.20.1.91
Jazayeri, M. & Movshon, J. A. Optimal representation of sensory information by neural populations. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 690–696 (2006).
pubmed: 16617339 doi: 10.1038/nn1691
Sahani, M. & Dayan, P. Doubly distributional population codes: simultaneous representation of uncertainty and multiplicity. Neural Comput. 15, 2255–2279 (2003).
pubmed: 14511521 doi: 10.1162/089976603322362356
Sohn, H. & Narain, D. Neural implementations of Bayesian inference. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 70, 121–129 (2021).
pubmed: 34678599 doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2021.09.008
Dayan, P. & Abbott, L. F. Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems (MIT Press, 2005).
Pouget, A., Dayan, P. & Zemel, R. S. Inference and computation with population codes. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 26, 381–410 (2003).
pubmed: 12704222 doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.26.041002.131112
Deneve, S., Latham, P. E. & Pouget, A. Reading population codes: a neural implementation of ideal observers. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 740–745 (1999).
pubmed: 10412064 doi: 10.1038/11205
Fetsch, C. R., Pouget, A., DeAngelis, G. C. & Angelaki, D. E. Neural correlates of reliability-based cue weighting during multisensory integration. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 146–154 (2012).
doi: 10.1038/nn.2983
Ma, W. J., Beck, J. M., Latham, P. E. & Pouget, A. Bayesian inference with probabilistic population codes. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 1432–1438 (2006). Introduced the concept of probabilistic population code as the idea that the representation of probability distribution over a latent world state by a population of neurons, conferred by an internal model of neural variability, allows certain Bayesian computations to be implemented by simple neural operations.
pubmed: 17057707 doi: 10.1038/nn1790
Fiser, J., Berkes, P., Orbán, G. & Lengyel, M. Statistically optimal perception and learning: from behavior to neural representations. Trends Cogn. Sci. 14, 119–130 (2010).
pubmed: 20153683 pmcid: 2939867 doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.01.003
Echeveste, R., Aitchison, L., Hennequin, G. & Lengyel, M. Cortical-like dynamics in recurrent circuits optimized for sampling-based probabilistic inference. Nat. Neurosci. 23, 1138–1149 (2020). Shows that an artificial neural network can be trained to emit spikes that correspond to samples from a posterior distribution of some feature of the input. Although not trained to do so, the artificial network shows dynamics similar to those of actual neural networks.
pubmed: 32778794 pmcid: 7610392 doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-0671-1
Bach, D. R., Hulme, O., Penny, W. D. & Dolan, R. J. The known unknowns: neural representation of second-order uncertainty, and ambiguity. J. Neurosci. 31, 4811–4820 (2011).
pubmed: 21451019 pmcid: 3166851 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1452-10.2011
Bányai, M. et al. Stimulus complexity shapes response correlations in primary visual cortex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 2723–2732 (2019). Example of a code-driven approach that uses a sampling-based code and shows that the covariance of neural activity in a population of neurons can be explained by hierarchical inference with a prominent impact of the image’s higher-level features even in regions tuned to local features, such as the primary visual cortex.
pubmed: 30692266 pmcid: 6377442 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1816766116
Grinband, J., Hirsch, J. & Ferrera, V. P. A neural representation of categorization uncertainty in the human brain. Neuron 49, 757–763 (2006).
pubmed: 16504950 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.01.032
Trudel, N. et al. Polarity of uncertainty representation during exploration and exploitation in ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 83–98 (2021).
pubmed: 32868885 doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0929-3
Strange, B. A., Duggins, A., Penny, W., Dolan, R. J. & Friston, K. J. Information theory, novelty and hippocampal responses: unpredicted or unpredictable? Neural Netw. 18, 225–230 (2005).
pubmed: 15896570 doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2004.12.004
Tan, H., Wade, C. & Brown, P. Post-movement beta activity in sensorimotor cortex indexes confidence in the estimations from internal models. J. Neurosci. 36, 1516–1528 (2016).
pubmed: 26843635 pmcid: 4737767 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3204-15.2016
Hsu, M., Bhatt, M., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D. & Camerer, C. F. Neural systems responding to degrees of uncertainty in human decision-making. Science 310, 1680–1683 (2005). Presented a distinction between uncertainty about a latent feature and uncertainty about an outcome (referred to as ambiguity and risk, respectively, in behavioral economics), whose fMRI correlates are anatomically segregated in the human brain.
pubmed: 16339445 doi: 10.1126/science.1115327
Monosov, I. E., Leopold, D. A. & Hikosaka, O. Neurons in the primate medial basal forebrain signal combined information about reward uncertainty, value, and punishment anticipation. J. Neurosci. 35, 7443–7459 (2015).
pubmed: 25972172 pmcid: 4429151 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0051-15.2015
Monosov, I. E. & Hikosaka, O. Selective and graded coding of reward uncertainty by neurons in the primate anterodorsal septal region. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 756–762 (2013).
pubmed: 23666181 pmcid: 4160807 doi: 10.1038/nn.3398
Preuschoff, K., Bossaerts, P. & Quartz, S. R. Neural differentiation of expected reward and risk in human subcortical structures. Neuron 51, 381–390 (2006).
pubmed: 16880132 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.06.024
So, N. & Stuphorn, V. Supplementary eye field encodes confidence in decisions under risk. Cereb. Cortex 26, 764–782 (2016).
pubmed: 25750256
Michael, E., de Gardelle, V., Nevado-Holgado, A. & Summerfield, C. Unreliable evidence: 2 sources of uncertainty during perceptual choice. Cereb. Cortex 25, 937–947 (2015). Example of a correlational approach that uses a categorization task based on either shape or color from trial to trial and identifies representations of uncertainty about the decision that are invariant to the perceptual feature (shape or color) on which a decision is based.
pubmed: 24122138 doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht287
Nastase, S. A., Davis, B. & Hasson, U. Cross-modal and non-monotonic representations of statistical regularity are encoded in local neural response patterns. NeuroImage 173, 509–517 (2018).
pubmed: 29477440 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.019
Fleming, S. M. & Daw, N. D. Self-evaluation of decision-making: a general Bayesian framework for metacognitive computation. Psychol. Rev. 124, 91–114 (2017).
pubmed: 28004960 pmcid: 5178868 doi: 10.1037/rev0000045
Zylberberg, A., Roelfsema, P. R. & Sigman, M. Variance misperception explains illusions of confidence in simple perceptual decisions. Conscious. Cognition 27, 246–253 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2014.05.012
Fleming, S. M. & Dolan, R. J. Effects of loss aversion on post-decision wagering: implications for measures of awareness. Conscious. Cognition 19, 352–363 (2010).
doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.11.002
Blankenstein, N. E., Peper, J. S., Crone, E. A. & van Duijvenvoorde, A. C. K. Neural mechanisms underlying risk and ambiguity attitudes. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 29, 1845–1859 (2017).
pubmed: 28686139 doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01162
Ting, C. -C., Yu, C. -C., Maloney, L. T. & Wu, S. -W. Neural mechanisms for integrating prior knowledge and likelihood in value-based probabilistic inference. J. Neurosci. 35, 1792–1805 (2015).
pubmed: 25632152 pmcid: 4308614 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3161-14.2015
Haefner, R. M., Berkes, P. & Fiser, J. Perceptual decision-making as probabilistic inference by neural sampling. Neuron 90, 649–660 (2016).
pubmed: 27146267 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.03.020
Rahnev, D. et al. Attention induces conservative subjective biases in visual perception. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 1513–1515 (2011).
pubmed: 22019729 doi: 10.1038/nn.2948
Schultz, W. et al. Explicit neural signals reflecting reward uncertainty. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 363, 3801–3811 (2008).
pubmed: 18829433 pmcid: 2581779 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0152
DiCarlo, J. J., Zoccolan, D. & Rust, N. C. How does the brain solve visual object recognition? Neuron 73, 415–434 (2012).
pubmed: 22325196 pmcid: 3306444 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.01.010
Kriegeskorte, N. & Diedrichsen, J. Peeling the onion of brain representations. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 42, 407–432 (2019).
pubmed: 31283895 doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-080317-061906
Pouget, A., Beck, J. M., Ma, W. J. & Latham, P. E. Probabilistic brains: knowns and unknowns. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 1170–1178 (2013).
pubmed: 23955561 pmcid: 4487650 doi: 10.1038/nn.3495
Koblinger, Á., Fiser, J. & Lengyel, M. Representations of uncertainty: where art thou? Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 38, 150–162 (2021).
pubmed: 34026948 pmcid: 8121756 doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.03.009
FitzGerald, T. H. B., Seymour, B., Bach, D. R. & Dolan, R. J. Differentiable neural substrates for learned and described value and risk. Curr. Biol. 20, 1823–1829 (2010).
pubmed: 20888231 pmcid: 2977067 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.08.048
Huettel, S. A. Decisions under uncertainty: probabilistic context influences activation of prefrontal and parietal cortices. J. Neurosci. 25, 3304–3311 (2005).
pubmed: 15800185 pmcid: 6724903 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5070-04.2005
Monosov, I. E. Anterior cingulate is a source of valence-specific information about value and uncertainty. Nat. Commun. 8, 134 (2017).
pubmed: 28747623 pmcid: 5529456 doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00072-y
Acerbi, L., Vijayakumar, S. & Wolpert, D. M. On the origins of suboptimality in human probabilistic inference. PLoS Comput Biol. 10, e1003661 (2014).
pubmed: 24945142 pmcid: 4063671 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003661
Yeon, J. & Rahnev, D. The suboptimality of perceptual decision making with multiple alternatives. Nat. Commun. 11, 3857 (2020).
pubmed: 32737317 pmcid: 7395091 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17661-z
Dabney, W. et al. A distributional code for value in dopamine-based reinforcement learning. Nature 577, 671–675 (2020).
pubmed: 31942076 pmcid: 7476215 doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1924-6
Haxby, J. V. et al. Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex. Science 293, 2425–2430 (2001).
pubmed: 11577229 doi: 10.1126/science.1063736
Haxby, J. V., Connolly, A. C. & Guntupalli, J. S. Decoding neural representational spaces using multivariate pattern analysis. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 37, 435–456 (2014).
pubmed: 25002277 doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-062012-170325
Huth, A. G., de Heer, W. A., Griffiths, T. L., Theunissen, F. E. & Gallant, J. L. Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex. Nature 532, 453–458 (2016).
pubmed: 27121839 pmcid: 4852309 doi: 10.1038/nature17637
Park, I. M., Meister, M. L. R., Huk, A. C. & Pillow, J. W. Encoding and decoding in parietal cortex during sensorimotor decision-making. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 1395–1403 (2014).
pubmed: 25174005 pmcid: 4176983 doi: 10.1038/nn.3800
Pillow, J. W. et al. Spatio-temporal correlations and visual signalling in a complete neuronal population. Nature 454, 995–999 (2008).
pubmed: 18650810 pmcid: 2684455 doi: 10.1038/nature07140
Haynes, J. -D. A primer on pattern-based approaches to fMRI: principles, pitfalls and perspectives. Neuron 87, 257–270 (2015).
pubmed: 26182413 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.05.025
Hubel, D. H. & Wiesel, T. N. Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat’s striate cortex. J. Physiol. 148, 574–591 (1959).
pubmed: 14403679 pmcid: 1363130 doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006308
DeWind, N. K., Adams, G. K., Platt, M. L. & Brannon, E. M. Modeling the approximate number system to quantify the contribution of visual stimulus features. Cognition 142, 247–265 (2015).
pubmed: 26056747 pmcid: 4831213 doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.016
Quiroga, R. Q., Reddy, L., Kreiman, G., Koch, C. & Fried, I. Invariant visual representation by single neurons in the human brain. Nature 435, 1102–1107 (2005).
pubmed: 15973409 doi: 10.1038/nature03687
Baker, B., Lansdell, B. & Kording, K. A philosophical understanding of representation for neuroscience. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2102.06592 (2021).
Nichols, M. J. & Newsome, W. T. Middle temporal visual area microstimulation influences veridical judgments of motion direction. J. Neurosci. 22, 9530–9540 (2002).
pubmed: 12417677 pmcid: 6758031 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-21-09530.2002
Cortese, A., Amano, K., Koizumi, A., Kawato, M. & Lau, H. Multivoxel neurofeedback selectively modulates confidence without changing perceptual performance. Nat. Commun. 7, 13669 (2016).
pubmed: 27976739 pmcid: 5171844 doi: 10.1038/ncomms13669
Gherman, S. & Philiastides, M. G. Human VMPFC encodes early signatures of confidence in perceptual decisions. eLife 7, e38293 (2018).
pubmed: 30247123 pmcid: 6199131 doi: 10.7554/eLife.38293

Auteurs

Edgar Y Walker (EY)

Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Computational Neuroscience Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Stephan Pohl (S)

Department of Philosophy, New York University, New York, NY, USA.

Rachel N Denison (RN)

Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.

David L Barack (DL)

Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Philosophy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Jennifer Lee (J)

Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA.

Ned Block (N)

Department of Philosophy, New York University, New York, NY, USA.

Wei Ji Ma (WJ)

Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.

Florent Meyniel (F)

Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, INSERM, CEA, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin center, Gif-sur-Yvette, France. florent.meyniel@cea.fr.

Articles similaires

1.00
Humans Personality Judgment Choice Behavior Male
Neural Networks, Computer Uncertainty Humans Decision Making Cognition

Classifications MeSH