Assessment of fully digitalized workflow for implant-prosthetic rehabilitation in temporomandibular disorders patients: A clinical study.

Digitalized prosthetic rehabilitation Jaw Motion tracking Temporomandibular disorders

Journal

The Saudi dental journal
ISSN: 1013-9052
Titre abrégé: Saudi Dent J
Pays: Saudi Arabia
ID NLM: 9313603

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2023
Historique:
received: 11 03 2023
revised: 21 05 2023
accepted: 24 05 2023
medline: 11 10 2023
pubmed: 11 10 2023
entrez: 11 10 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Digitalized workflow eliminates the need for the tray, impression materials, its decontamination, packaging and shipping, pouring with plaster, cast fabrication, mounting in an articulator, reducing storage spaces, and the risks of any loss or fracture of the plaster model is overcome by archiving on the computer. This clinical investigation aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the fully digitalized rehabilitation [implant-supported prosthesis] method in partially edentulous patients and with TMD, using advanced software. Twelve patients requiring implant-supported prosthesis in the mandibular molar area with Temporomandibular disorders [TMD] were selected. The fully digitalized rehabilitation method with advanced software was used for rehabilitation. For each subject, Optical impressions, CBCT scan, and Digital recording of jaw movement data. Guided implant surgery and digitalized prosthetic rehabilitation; were performed. The effectiveness of the digitalized workflow was assessed by evaluating the changes in the joint symptoms before and after the end of the treatment, changes in the electromyographic tracings, the precision of the prosthetic artefact, assessed through the amount of chair adjustment operating time and the number of retouching/ modifications to be carried out before the completion of the work. The results showed that the mean operative time required in 12 patients was 9.42 min, significantly less than the time recorded in previous studies when the medium mean was 16.00 min. The mean number of touch-ups [adjustments] was less than 3, most of which were on the interproximal surfaces. There were no significant changes recorded in the electromyography tracings. There were also no changes in joint symptoms. It was found that this way of working was entirely reliable and significantly reduced operating times and the number of appointments. Digital flow is beneficial ei dysfunctional patients, not about improvements in temporomandibular symptoms but in times of operability and prosthetic retouching.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37817790
doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.05.024
pii: S1013-9052(23)00106-2
pmc: PMC10562120
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

684-691

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors.

Références

J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Feb 21;:
pubmed: 35210107
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 7;17(1):e0261870
pubmed: 34995298
Cranio. 2020 Jan;38(1):58-65
pubmed: 29629642
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017;10 Suppl 1:101-120
pubmed: 28944372
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Feb 18;21(4):
pubmed: 33670498
BMC Oral Health. 2018 May 15;18(1):88
pubmed: 29764458
Int J Prosthodont. 2021 Feb 23;34(5):554–559
pubmed: 33625395
J Orthod. 2020 Jun;47(2):140-148
pubmed: 32114874
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012 Aug;114(2):259-65
pubmed: 22769412
J Orthod Sci. 2017 Jul-Sep;6(3):104-109
pubmed: 28717635
J Oral Rehabil. 2017 Aug;44(8):580-588
pubmed: 28498502
J Can Dent Assoc. 2006 Feb;72(1):75-80
pubmed: 16480609
J Prosthodont. 2008 Aug;17(6):476-81
pubmed: 18482361
Int J Comput Dent. 2019;22(3):283-292
pubmed: 31463492
Int J Comput Dent. 2014;17(1):75-82
pubmed: 24791467
Biomed Eng Online. 2019 May 16;18(1):59
pubmed: 31096969
Int J Comput Dent. 2014;17(1):65-74
pubmed: 24791466
J Am Dent Assoc. 2020 Feb;151(2):127-135
pubmed: 31883705
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022 Jan-Feb;37(1):67-75
pubmed: 35235622
J Prosthodont. 2022 Jan;31(1):79-84
pubmed: 34170604
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Nov;120(5):635-641
pubmed: 30093128
Int J Comput Dent. 2018;21(1):57-70
pubmed: 29610781
Int J Comput Dent. 2015;18(3):225-35
pubmed: 26389134

Auteurs

Giuseppe Minervini (G)

Multidisciplinary Department of Medical-Surgical and Dental Specialties, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.

Rocco Franco (R)

Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome 00100, Italy.

Salvatore Crimi (S)

Department of General Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.

Manuele Basili (M)

Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome 00100, Italy.

Saurabh Chaturvedi (S)

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.

Marco Cicciù (M)

Department of General Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.

Alberto Bianchi (A)

Department of General Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, School of Dentistry, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.

Gabriele Cervino (G)

School of Dentistry Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, via Consolare Valeria, 1, 98125 Messina, Italy.

Classifications MeSH